Evaluate the management philosophy of Walmart from the point of view of stockholders, employees, customers, the local community, and suppliers.
Should business management always seek the lowest prices for its customers and the highest rate of return on investment? What reasons might there be for seeking something less for customers and stockholders?
Economists define costs in terms of opportunities forgone. What opportunities are forgone by Walmart’s “everyday low price” marketing strategy? Who pays the costs of Walmart’s low prices?
Walmart’s wages are above the legally required minimum wage, and health benefits are not legally mandated. Are there reasons for a business to take actions not required by law that might reduce profits?
Does Walmart have any responsibilities to its suppliers other than those specified in their contracts?
Walton’s original marketing strategy was to empha size low prices, and this strategy continues today as reflected in its marketing campaign of “everyday low prices.”
Every firm’s goal is to gain profit but still need to be ethically conducted, for wal-mart case might be a “NO” for the business management to always seek the lowest price for its customers due their unethically doing towards their employee, where they cut off the wages and salary and being pushed by working overtime.
The reason for seeking less for customer and stockholder is the loyalty of its customer itself, maybe some people concern about the employees and that makes them won’t go shopping at wal-mart anymore, or the destroy of the company itself when one day all of the wal-mart branch are sued and the value of the stock is broke
The opportunities forgone the employee of the Wal-Mart.
The one who pays the cost is the walmart employees, since walmart pay their employees with low price salary and demand their work to high intensity then they will be able to press their inventory price towards the market.