pollev.com/chrismakler
From last week: What are the arguments of a Hicksian (cost-minimizing) demand function?
In other words, what goes in the parentheses of \(x_1^c(\cdots)\) and \(x_2^c(\cdots)\)?
Christopher Makler
Stanford University Department of Economics
Econ 50: Lecture 18
"X elasticity of Y"
or "Elasticity of Y with respect to X"
Examples:
"Price elasticity of demand"
"Income elasticity of demand"
"Cross-price elasticity of demand"
"Price elasticity of supply"
Perfectly Inelastic
Inelastic
Unit Elastic
Elastic
Perfectly Elastic
Doesn't change
Changes by less than the change in X
Changes proportionally to the change in X
Changes by more than the change in X
Changes "infinitely" (usually: to/from zero)
How does the endogenous variable Y respond to a
change in the exogenous variable X?
(note: all of these refer to the ratio of the perentage change, not absolute change)
pollev.com/chrismakler
General formula:
Linear relationship:
Using calculus:
Multiplicative relationship:
Note: the slope of the relationship is \(b\).
Elasticity is related to, but not the same thing as, slope.
This is related to logs, in a way that you can explore in the homework.
This is a super useful trick and one that comes up on exams all the time!
How much of a good a consumer wants to buy, as a function of:
We can ask: how much does the amount of this good change, when one of those determinants changes?
What is the effect of a 1% change
in the price of good 1 \((p_1)\) on the quantity demanded of good 1 \((x_1^*)\)?
no change
perfectly inelastic
less than 1%
inelastic
exactly 1%
unit elastic
more than 1%
elastic
What is the effect of an increase
in the price of good 2 \((p_2)\) on the quantity demanded of good 1 \((x_1^*)\)?
no change
independent
decrease
complements
increase
substitutes
What is the effect of an increase
in income \((m)\) on the quantity demanded of good 1 \((x_1^*)\)?
decrease
good 1 is inferior
increase
good 1 is normal
The profit from \(q\) units of output
PROFIT
REVENUE
COST
is the revenue from selling them
minus the cost of producing them.
We will assume that the firm sells all units of the good for the same price, \(p\). (No "price discrimination")
The revenue from \(q\) units of output
REVENUE
PRICE
QUANTITY
is the price at which each unit it sold
times the quantity (# of units sold).
The price the firm can charge may depend on the number of units it wants to sell: inverse demand \(p(q)\)
Demand curve:
quantity as a function of price
Inverse demand curve:
price as a function of quantity
QUANTITY
PRICE
If the firm wants to sell \(q\) units, it sells all units at the same price \(p(q)\)
Since all units are sold for \(p\), the average revenue per unit is just \(p\).
By the product rule...
let's delve into this...
The total revenue is the price times quantity (area of the rectangle)
Note: \(MR < 0\) if
The total revenue is the price times quantity (area of the rectangle)
If the firm wants to sell \(dq\) more units, it needs to drop its price by \(dp\)
Revenue loss from lower price on existing sales of \(q\): \(dp \times q\)
Revenue gain from additional sales at \(p\): \(dq \times p\)
(multiply first term by \(p/p\))
(simplify)
(since \(\epsilon < 0\))
Notes
Elastic demand: \(MR > 0\)
Inelastic demand: \(MR < 0\)
In general: the more elastic demand is, the less one needs to lower ones price to sell more goods, so the closer \(MR\) is to \(p\).