pollev.com/chrismakler
Eric office hours at the SEA Study Night tonight!
Pete office hours Wednesday 3:30
(place TBD)
Makler office hour/review session on zoom Wednesday night
No section or homework this week!
Christopher Makler
Stanford University Department of Economics
Econ 51: Lecture 15
Not as much a "one size fits all" model,
but more of an approach:
Two roommates, Ken and Chris.
Ken is a smoker who can smoke up to 10 hours per day.
Chris is a non-smoker and dislikes Ken's smoking.
Preferences
Each have preferences over how much Ken smokes (good 1) and money (good 2).
Preferences
Each have preferences over how much Ken smokes (good 1) and money (good 2).
Suppose we define property rights over smoking.
This is like an endowment:
Let's assume Chris and Ken each start with $100.
If we allow them to trade from their endowment, they'll end up on the contract curve — at an efficient allocation!
Under certain circumstances, the efficient amount of externality is independent of the original assignment of property rights.
Base Model: Profit Maximization
Extension: Production choices affect other's profit
Conflict: Steel mill only takes into account its own cost,
not impact on the fishery.
Solution: assign property rights and allow bargaining, or merge.
Internalize the externality so that private marginal cost equals social marginal cost.
Competitive equilibrium:
consumers set \(P = MB\),
producers set \(P = PMC \Rightarrow MB = PMC\)
With a tax: consumers set \(P = MB\),
producers set \(P - t = PMC\)
Village of 35 people who can choose to fish or hunt.
Each fish is worth $10; each deer is worth $100. Every hunter gets one deer.
If \(L\) people fish, (and \(35 - L\) people hunt), total fish caught: \(f(L) = 40L - L^2\)
Total revenue from fishing:
Total revenue from hunting:
Average revenue per fisher:
Average revenue per hunter:
Marginal revenue from additional fish:
Marginal cost of having that person not hunt:
What's the effect of an increase in \(L\)?
Suppose you needed to buy a fishing permit for a fee F.
What value of F would result in the optimal L*?
Suppose the village levied a tax of t per fish caught.
What value of t would result in the optimal L*?
Efficiency in the Edgeworth box comes from everyone
equating their own private marginal benefits and costs.
In the presence of externalities, personal decisions affect others.
If everyone just balances their own personal marginal benefits and costs,
it can have a negative (or positive) external effect on others.
Markets will not, in general, result in a Pareto efficient outcome on their own — there is a role for government intervention.
For the rest of this course, we're going to derive
a general framework for analyzing situations in which
everyone's payoffs are a result of everyone's actions.