Loading

BIOSC 1630: Lecture 01

aalexmmaldonado

This is a live streamed presentation. You will automatically follow the presenter and see the slide they're currently on.

Computational Biology Seminar

Lecture 01

(BIOSC 1630)

Aug 28, 2024

After today, you should be able to

1.  Understand course structure and expectations.
2.  Outline the requirements and goals of the perspective primers.
3.  Compare and contrast different types of scientific articles.
4.  Explain the key components of the research ecosystem.
5.  Apply effective strategies to find relevant literature.

Meet your teaching team

Instructor
Alex Maldonado, PhD

he/him/his

B.S.E in Chemical Engineering, 2018
Western Michigan University

Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering, 2023
University of Pittsburgh

Postdoctoral Associate in Computational Biology

Acceptable ways to address me:

Alex (preferred)

Dr. Maldonado

Dr. Alex

Dr. M

Office hours: By appointment

Email: alex.maldonado@pitt.edu

Alex's fun facts

Every male in my (maternal) family played football 

I rebelled

Alex's fun facts

Part-time jobs

  • Construction
  • UPS package handler
  • Kent County Traffic safety
  • Jimmy John's delivery driver
  • Wings West ice events

Get to know my ...

Tessa the cat

All course material is hosted online

Things that contain student information will be only on Canvas to be FERPA compliant

Assignments will be submitted on Gradescope

Reading and critiquing research

We will be routinely reading primary research articles within computational biology

New methods come out all of the time, which ones should you use?

Will enhance your knowledge of the field

You will read one research article every two weeks

I have picked several papers across computational biology published in 2023

A pre-class assignment will ensure you are prepared for discussion-based activities

Enhancing your critical thinking by reading literature

"I'm not going to graduate school, so why am I taking a whole class reading literature?"

Reading literature is a great activity to practice critical thinking and skepticism

Peer reviewed does not mean infallible

BIOSC 1640 is where you problem solve

Problems, solutions, and ideas need to be shared

Every job description likely contains "Excellent communication skills"

We will help you hone your communication skills with writing a perspective paper

You will write a perspective paper during the semester

Writing-intensive courses require 11 to 13 single-spaced pages of writing

This is an atypical two-credit course

Paper is chunked into smaller assignments due periodically throughout the semester

I will accept the following graduate fellowship applications in lieu of writing a perspective

Research statements for these applications are more rigorous than this perspective

After today, you should be able to

1.  Understand course structure and expectations.
2.  Outline the requirements and goals of the perspective primers.
3.  Compare and contrast different types of scientific articles.
4.  Explain the key components of the research ecosystem.
5.  Apply effective strategies to find relevant literature.

Primer 1: Protein structure prediction

AlphaFold has undoubtedly revolutionized protein structure prediction

AF3 can predict any (ordered) biomolecule with post-translational modifications

Primer 1: Protein structure prediction

AlphaFold is a complicated machine learning model that is trained to reproduce experimental structures

It achieves transferability by learning to find coevolutionary signals of residue-residue proximity

Primer 1: Protein structure prediction

Ab initio methods use physical representations and calculations to compute structures

Expensive but interpretable

Should we abandon ab initio methods for protein structure prediction?

Primer 2: Molecular dynamics for drug design

Drug discovery aims to identify drug candidates from a large search space

Primer 2: Molecular dynamics for drug design

Protein-ligand docking can rapidly identify binding poses based on parameterized scoring functions and/or machine learning

Primer 2: Molecular dynamics for drug design

Molecular simulations account for solvent, protein, and ligand dynamics

Significantly enhanced conformational sampling and free energies (e.g., entropy)

Primer 2: Molecular dynamics for drug design

With experimental assays becoming more economical, why spend the time running simulations?

Alchemical simulations systematically turn off the ligand's interaction with proteins

Primer 2: Molecular dynamics for drug design

Experimental techniques probe drug action before investing in clinical trials

Should we bypass molecular simulations and go straight to experimental assays?

Each primer has no right answer; I'm just looking for your opinion with supporting evidence

After today, you should be able to

1.  Understand course structure and expectations.
2.  Outline the requirements and goals of the perspective primers.

3.  Compare and contrast different types of scientific articles.
4.  Explain the key components of the research ecosystem.
5.  Apply effective strategies to find relevant literature.

Primary literature: Original research by scientists in the field

  • Contains novel computational methods, algorithms, or analyses
  • Published in peer-reviewed  journals
  • Includes detailed methodology, datasets, and statistical analyses
  • Often accompanied by open-source code or software tools

Review: Summarizes the current state of knowledge in a specific area

  • Synthesis of multiple primary research articles
  • No new experimental data presented
  • Analyzes trends, gaps, and future directions in research

Perspective: Presents author's viewpoint on a specific topic or issue

  • Discusses potential impacts of new technologies or approaches
  • Often addresses controversial or emerging areas
  • May propose new research directions or hypotheses
  • Not peer-reviewed as rigorously as primary research

Ten-minute break

After today, you should be able to

1.  Understand course structure and expectations.
2.  Outline the requirements and goals of the perspective primers.
3.  Compare and contrast different types of scientific articles.

4.  Explain the key components of the research ecosystem.
5.  Apply effective strategies to find relevant literature.

Understanding the research ecosystem sheds light on literature caveats

Carnegie classifications of Universitites

Doctorate-granting universities

R1: Very high research activity

  • ~ 3% of universities
  • Destination of major federal and private funding

R2: High research activity

Basically how much money a university spends on research

Hiring tenure-stream professors

Application process

  • Often 300+ applications for a single position
  • Comprehensive application package
  • Multiple phone/video interviews
  • Campus visits with seminars, chalk talks, meetings, etc.

Selection criteria

  • High performance in research
  • Grant potential
  • Fit with department research priorities and culture

Tenure-stream expectations

  • Independently publish by year three
  • Mentor research trainees
  • Invited to speak at institutions and conferences
  • Provide service to department and profession
  • Develop one undergraduate course

Getting tenure

  • Quality, impact, and consistency of research
  • Number, size, and prestige of funding sources
  • Teaching excellence not required
  • Faculty and dean vote; provost has final say

Tenure catalyzes a publish or perish culture

Journal prestige

Impact factor tries to communicate how "groundbreaking" publications in that journal are

Research productivity

H-index is a quick, imperfect way to quantify research quality of a professor

Grant acquisition

  • Professors pay (and train) others to do their research
  • Provides funding for research projects and lab personnel
  • Major Funding Sources:
    • Federal: NIH, NSF, DOE, DOD, NASA
    • Private foundations: Gates Foundation, Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    • Industry partnerships

Grant databases

Obtaining grants is extremely difficult

  • Time-consuming application process
  • Balancing grant writing with ongoing research and teaching
  • Success rates often below 20%
  • Navigating changing funding priorities
  • Multiple submission rounds

Critical evaluation

Just because it is peer-reviewed does not mean it is perfect

Things you should be considerate of

  • Do the authors have the appropriate expertise?
  • Are the methods state-of-the-art or justified?
  • Is the journal reputable?
  • Do the results support their conclusions?
  • Are the results reproducible?

After today, you should be able to

1.  Understand course structure and expectations.
2.  Outline the requirements and goals of the perspective primers.
3.  Compare and contrast different types of scientific articles.
4.  Explain the key components of the research ecosystem.

5.  Apply effective strategies to find relevant literature.

Before the next class, you should

Lecture 02:
Reading literature

Lecture 01:
Course overview

Today

Next Wednesday