Erik Jansson, DAMTP
I am mathematician, postdoc at the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics
I work with telling computers how to solve equations approximately
And, more importantly, proving that these approximations are correct
However, most equations cannot be solved with pen and paper!
Let's explain what I mean by some examples....
Coarse
Fine
Smaller steps seems better! Are we done?
Let's look at an example.
Classical mechanics problem.
Dates back to Newton
Physics demands: energy is conserved; planets stay on their orbits.
Which simulations of the N-body problem can we trust?
Which one is the best? Both are accurate and good methods and the steps are small!
Why does the left Mercury crash into the sun?
The non-geometric algorithm loses energy, leading to the crash and non-physical behavior
The fix is to build physics into the method: this is geometric integration, or, methods that
preserve the structure of motion
Used every day in for instance materials science, plasma physics, and fluid simulations
Additional maths work: derive which structures from geometry and physics we want to
preserve, construct methods that provably does this.
Turbulence modelling
Stochastic fluid dynamics
Spin chains