A TVS + LSST Discovery Alliance program
mentoring is a skill that, like all skills, must be learned, and most academic institutions do not have structures in place to train mentors in effective mentorship practices
Byars-Winston and Dahlberg (2019),
The Science of Effective Mentoring
“Because mentorship can be so influential in shaping the future STEMM workforce, its occurrence should not be left to chance or idiosyncratic implementation. There is a gap between what we know about effective mentoring and how it is practiced in higher education”.
In this article, we discuss how the current state of academia often fails URM STEM students and faculty
While the question in the literature some 15 years ago seemed to be “Does Mentoring Matter?” (e.g. Eby et al. 2008), literature prior to the 2010s establish a wealth of evidence to firmly answer this question: mentoring does matter!
Results demonstrate that mentoring is associated with a wide range of favorable behavioral, attitudinal, health-related, relational, motivational, and career outcomes [...]
Generally, larger effect sizes were detected for academic and workplace mentoring
So the pressing question in becomes, “What Makes Mentoring Effective”. Beutel and Spooner-Lane (2009)
the success of mentoring relationships lies in the skills and knowledge of the mentors;
yet this also requires developing professional–personal relationships
including with a focus on the identity of the mentee and their belonging to historically marginalized groups in STEM.
[...] students from historically excluded groups whose research mentors addressed [and] validated their racial and academic identities reported greater involvement in research, higher science identity and belonging in research, and higher STEM degree graduation rates than those whose mentors did not do so (Heager et al. 2016).
However, some research mentors may not see the relevance in acknowledging such variables in their mentoring relationships (Butz, et al. 2019; Prunuske et al. 2013 ) [...] concerns of being misunderstood as being prejudiced or otherwise offending their mentee (Byars-Winston et al. 2020).
On the basis of this evidence, Byars-Winston and Dahlberg, 2019 concluded that recognizing and responding to cultural diversity can contribute to mentors’ effectiveness and that there is an urgent need to build this capacity in research mentors (Barber et al. 2020)
So the pressing question in becomes, “What Makes Mentoring Effective”. Beutel and Spooner-Lane (2009)
Phase 1: Send 3-4 TVS members to be trained at the CIMER center
During this workshop, participants are introduced to the following key areas
Workshop participants become familiar with the curricula, practice facilitating activities, explore extensive implementation resources, and develop a plan for implementing the training at their institution or organization.
Shar Daniels will act as program coordinator. They will coordinate with the new facilitator the organization of two workshops/year
Phase 2: Organize TVS/Rubin mentroing training
Shar Daniels will act as program coordinator.
They will track the metrics of success
Phase 3: Metrics of success
Ability to recruit mentors facilitatators within the Rubin community.
Demand and participation in training sessions led by the trained facilitators. Candidate TVS Catalyst mentors will be requested to participate in this training or to provide evidence of alternative training to increase the effectiveness of the Catalyst fellowship’s mentoring program.
Following the career paths of mentees of the trained mentors
Interviews with mentees and a control sample could be conducted but this may require consultation with a lawyer to obtain (the equivalent of) an IRB.