(...you have to put the work in to it.)
2021 James B. Wilson, Colorado State University
Is it meaningful too...
"matrix" elevates data to a math;
thus, it must comply with rules.
A table which cannot be explored linearly is not a matrix.
Rows?
Columns?
Adjacency: \(A_{ij}\) if \((i,j)\) is an edge.
Node-arc: rows=nodes, columns=edges,
+1 if start of edge, -1 if end of edge.
No, you cannot do linear algebra on the rows and columns without destroying the graph.
These are linear connection; but require nuance.
An image after some operations has nothing meaningful to do with the original information.
Once more, linear algebra is lurking, but you have to work for it.
Neither time nor rows/columns are meaningfully linear on video data.
Certainly not across the non-linear part.
If you attack a grid as a tensor,
you better show reason to expect the results to be meaningful.
(the rebuttal)
If your advisor, boss, or mentor calls every array a "tensor" then by all means go with it.
(You might just call actual tensors "formal tensors")