Peter Brooksbank Bucknell
Martin Kassabov Cornell
James B. Wilson Colorado State University
Ingredients: Rock, paper, scissors
Hamilton: Paper=Vector Space
Cauchy: Rock + scissors = Norm, Inner product;
In fact, you can use the scissors as your straight-edge if you want, i.e. Inner product gets you a norm.
\(\langle|\rangle:M\times M\rightarrowtail \mathcal{O}\) where \[\langle u|v\rangle =\bar{u}^tDv^d\]
*If \(2K=0\) then orthogonal uses norm not product.
Ingredients: One paper, but a pile of scissors
(Why did he replace compass with scissors?)
Cause he could find a photo of lots of scissor, duh!
Unit circle Drawn
Everyone can see one,
the x,y axes.
Unit circle Drawn
Everyone knows it can be done...
Unit circle Drawn
Unit circles Drawn
\(e_1\perp e_2\) for Euclidean
but \(\langle e_1|e_2\rangle\neq 0\)
\(\langle u_1,u_2\rangle=0\) but \((u_1|u_2)\neq 0\)
Unit circle Drawn
Given bilinear forms \(\Phi=\{\phi:V\times V\rightarrowtail L_{\phi}\}\) (where each \(L_{\phi}/K\) is a field extension)
Describe the \(\Phi\)-geometry.
Given a system \(\Phi=\{\varphi:V\times V\rightarrowtail L_{\phi}\}\) of bilinear forms, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the group of isometries.
Fix a field \(K=2K\) where you can factor polynomials and solve linear equations.
Given a system \(\Phi=\{\varphi:V\times V\rightarrowtail L_{\phi}\}\) of bilinear forms, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the group of isometries.
Fix a field \(K=2K\) where you can factor polynomials and solve linear equations.
Given two systems \(\Phi,\Gamma\) can decide isometry.
For \(p\neq 2\) average case class 2 \(p\)-group isomorphism is in polytime.
For \(2K=K\) breaks the Patarin post-quantum cypher.
For \(2K=K\) solve isometry in polytime.
Complexity of tensor graph analogs.
Group isomorphism by extension in polytime; tensor isomorphism, complixity classes, etc.
For \(p\neq 2\) isomorphism of quotients of Heisenberg groups in polytime.
Find characteristic subgroups, isomorphism test, invariants.
For \(p\neq 2\) adjoint-tensor isomorphism test.
The optimal bound on Gowers profiles is \(\log n-2\).
Isomorphism testing genus 2 is polytime.
Subgroup lattices of simple groups are as diverse as possible.
\(\alpha\)-Filter refinement.
\(\alpha\)-filters in polytime.
A Weisefeller-Lehman for groups
Precise structure formula \(\forall \Phi,\exists \tau_1,\ldots,\tau_{\ell}\) where \[\begin{aligned} \mathrm{Isom}(\Phi)&=(\mathrm{Isom}(\tau_1)\times\cdots\times \mathrm{Isom}(\tau_{\ell}))\ltimes O_p\\ O_p & = \{z+\sqrt{1+z^2}\mid \exists n.(z^n=0)\wedge(z^*=-z)\}.\end{aligned}\]
Informally: Neo-classical geometry decomposes into a series of classical geometries.
It all works in \(2K=0\) case.
In non-orthogonal type this happens and the invariant is to commute with a derivation (1-cocycle).
How do show this? Assume so, write down what it would require, call all failures "exceptional".
Over \(L=K[t]/(t^2)\) in \(\mathbb{M}_{2m}(L)\) make
No Taft splitting.
Isometries of \((A,*)/(J(A),*)\) do not lift.
Those that lift are
\[S^{\diamond}=\{s\in S\mid s^*s\equiv 1\mod{J(A)}, \exist m.((s+m)^*(s+m)=1)\}\]
These are quadratic equations, no hope to solve.
Reconfigure
After some algebra
\[\exists m.(\delta(s)= sm+ms)\]
\[S^{\diamond}=\{s\in S\mid sm\bar{s}=m\}\]
Still quadratic, but concentrates on a single defect, \(m\).
If \(2K=0\) then for all \(M\in \mathrm{Sym}\),
\[(A+B)M(A+B)^*\equiv AMA^*+BMB^*\pmod{\mathrm{Alt}}\]
If \(pK=0\) then \((a+b)^p=a^p+b^p\).
Fix involution \(M\mapsto M^*\) on \(\mathbb{M}_d(K)\),
\[\mathrm{Sym}=\{X\mid X^*=X\}\qquad \mathrm{Alt}=\{X\mid X^*=-X,\textnormal{0 diag}\}\]
\(2K=0\) need
If \(2K=0\) then for all \(M\in \mathrm{Sym}\),
\[(A+B)M(A+B)^*\equiv AMA^*+BMB^*\pmod{\mathrm{Alt}}\]
Fix involution \(M\mapsto M^*\) on \(\mathbb{M}_d(K)\),
\[\mathrm{Sym}=\{X\mid X^*=X\}\qquad \mathrm{Alt}=\{X\mid X^*=-X,\textnormal{0 diag}\}\]
Corollary. The isometries that lift are
\[\begin{aligned}S^{\diamond} & = \{s\mid \bar{s}s=1, sm\bar{s}=m\}\\ & = \{s\mid \bar{s}s=1, s\cdot m=m\}\\ & =\mathrm{Stab}_{\mathrm{Isom}(\phi)}(M)\end{aligned}\]
This is a known group: a max parabolic in an orthogonal group. You just write it down!