Peter Brooksbank Bucknell
Martin Kassabov Cornell
James B. Wilson Colorado State University
Ingredients: Rock, paper, scissors
Hamilton: Paper=Vector Space
Cauchy: Rock + scissors = Norm, Inner product;
In fact, you can use the scissors as your straight-edge if you want, i.e. Inner product gets you a norm.
⟨∣⟩:M×M↣O where ⟨u∣v⟩=uˉtDvd
*If 2K=0 then orthogonal uses norm not product.
Ingredients: One paper, but a pile of scissors
(Why did he replace compass with scissors?)
Cause he could find a photo of lots of scissor, duh!
Unit circle Drawn
Everyone can see one,
the x,y axes.
Unit circle Drawn
Everyone knows it can be done...
Unit circle Drawn
Unit circles Drawn
e1⊥e2 for Euclidean
but ⟨e1∣e2⟩=0
⟨u1,u2⟩=0 but (u1∣u2)=0
Unit circle Drawn
Given bilinear forms Φ={ϕ:V×V↣Lϕ} (where each Lϕ/K is a field extension)
Describe the Φ-geometry.
Given a system Φ={φ:V×V↣Lϕ} of bilinear forms, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the group of isometries.
Fix a field K=2K where you can factor polynomials and solve linear equations.
Given a system Φ={φ:V×V↣Lϕ} of bilinear forms, there is a polynomial-time algorithm to compute the group of isometries.
Fix a field K=2K where you can factor polynomials and solve linear equations.
Given two systems Φ,Γ can decide isometry.
For p=2 average case class 2 p-group isomorphism is in polytime.
For 2K=K breaks the Patarin post-quantum cypher.
For 2K=K solve isometry in polytime.
Complexity of tensor graph analogs.
Group isomorphism by extension in polytime; tensor isomorphism, complixity classes, etc.
For p=2 isomorphism of quotients of Heisenberg groups in polytime.
Find characteristic subgroups, isomorphism test, invariants.
For p=2 adjoint-tensor isomorphism test.
The optimal bound on Gowers profiles is logn−2.
Isomorphism testing genus 2 is polytime.
Subgroup lattices of simple groups are as diverse as possible.
α-Filter refinement.
α-filters in polytime.
A Weisefeller-Lehman for groups
Precise structure formula ∀Φ,∃τ1,…,τℓ where Isom(Φ)Op=(Isom(τ1)×⋯×Isom(τℓ))⋉Op={z+1+z2∣∃n.(zn=0)∧(z∗=−z)}.
Informally: Neo-classical geometry decomposes into a series of classical geometries.
It all works in 2K=0 case.
In non-orthogonal type this happens and the invariant is to commute with a derivation (1-cocycle).
How do show this? Assume so, write down what it would require, call all failures "exceptional".
Over L=K[t]/(t2) in M2m(L) make
No Taft splitting.
Isometries of (A,∗)/(J(A),∗) do not lift.
Those that lift are
S⋄={s∈S∣s∗s≡1modJ(A),∃m.((s+m)∗(s+m)=1)}
These are quadratic equations, no hope to solve.
Reconfigure
After some algebra
∃m.(δ(s)=sm+ms)
S⋄={s∈S∣smsˉ=m}
Still quadratic, but concentrates on a single defect, m.
If 2K=0 then for all M∈Sym,
(A+B)M(A+B)∗≡AMA∗+BMB∗(modAlt)
If pK=0 then (a+b)p=ap+bp.
Fix involution M↦M∗ on Md(K),
Sym={X∣X∗=X}Alt={X∣X∗=−X,0 diag}
2K=0 need
If 2K=0 then for all M∈Sym,
(A+B)M(A+B)∗≡AMA∗+BMB∗(modAlt)
Fix involution M↦M∗ on Md(K),
Sym={X∣X∗=X}Alt={X∣X∗=−X,0 diag}
Corollary. The isometries that lift are
S⋄={s∣sˉs=1,smsˉ=m}={s∣sˉs=1,s⋅m=m}=StabIsom(ϕ)(M)
This is a known group: a max parabolic in an orthogonal group. You just write it down!