Software in which source code is publicly available, that can be used, enhanced, modified and shared under specific conditions.
What's useful to me might be useful to others.
Unless something has to be private, it ought to be public.
User-centric: put efforts where users are, build what is most needed.
Maintainers
Contributors
Users
investment
Building the right software right is a complicated endeavor, so it's better done together.
Solve (useful) problems, and listen.
Rinse and repeat
Identify a problem
Find or build
a (good) solution
Help others
finding and using it
Listen to and
incorporate feedback
If we go Open Source, people will maintain the project for us through contributions.
Open Source isn't suitable for enterprise businesses because it lacks support and code quality is too low.
Because it's free, Open Source only costs money and cannot generate revenue.
Open Source means open governance: anyone can contribute and all ideas are always accepted.
If I use an Open Source projects, I am at the mercy of the maintainers and have to wait after them constantly.
All source code is publicly available under open source licenses. Not only for the compiler, but for the entire ecosystem of projects.
Feature changes are brought to life on public forums. Reviews, feedback and next steps are openly discussed.
There's no private component to our development process. Anyone can follow what is happening, how and when.
We strive to keep the entire project documented, from installation instructions to API reference, including details about maintainers and processes.
Practice
Theory
Understand
Use
TUTORIALS
HOW-TO GUIDES
EXPLANATIONS
REFERENCE
discovery-oriented
understanding-oriented
goal-oriented
information-oriented
( about documentation ... )
We keep communication with our community frequent and transparent. Announcing changes, seeking feedback, etc..
Documentation only gets you so far. People often needs assistance and it's also a great way to identify gaps in documentation.
Avoid 'big-bang' releases as much as possible, ship code often and in small chunks. Keep expectations low.
How decisions are taken should be clearly specified. Dictatorship and do-ocracy often rules in Open Source lands.
There's no such thing as a free lunch.
Comprehension is measured by the lack of questions.
It’s okay to be disappointed but never okay to be surprised.
Constructive discussion is about mutual understanding, rather than mutual agreement.
If it's not documented, it doesn't exist.