Nele Vandersickel
Normal function of the heart
Normal rhythm 60 beats/min: determined by the SA node => 100.000 beats per day.
:delay of the signal
Main questions
Mechanisms of the different types of arrhtyhmia
Computer modeling can help with these questions!
Regular
Irregular
Atrial Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation
Ventricular Tachycardia
Regular
Irregular
Atrial Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Fibrillation
The membrane: contains channels which can open and close
Nerst potential: 2 opposite forces:
You can find the equilibrium which gives you the Nerst potential
Nerst potential: 2 opposite forces:
You can find the equilibrium which gives you the Nerst potential
Most easy model: Hodgkin huxley (nerve cell)
Most easy model: Hodgkin huxley (nerve cell)
Most easy model: Hodgkin huxley (nerve cell)
The whole cell: many more channels
The whole cell: also internal dynamics
The whole cell: many more channels
The whole cell: many more channels
The whole cell: many more channels
All the channels can be modeled as:
The whole cell: many more channels
The whole cell: many more channels
There exist many different different models: for the ventricles 3 major models, more than 10 other models
The ORD model is being used to test the effect of drugs: ’Comprehensive in-vitro Pro-arrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative www.cipaproject.org. CiPA aims to replace the existing pro-arrhythmic safety testing and Thorough QT Study with a combination of ion channel screening, mathematical modelling, stem-cell derived myocyte experiments and more lightweight Phase I ECG monitoring’
Different cells are coupled
conduction of a wavefront
refraction: during the wavefront: no new wave can be excited
resting state: new wave can arrive
Single cell
2D tissue
Colliding waves annihilate
Wave can rotate in a ring, rotation is possible if the length of a ring (L) is longer than the product of the refractory period and the velocity of the wave: L > Rv
Wave can rotate around an obstacle/Wave can rotate around itself
Anatomical reentry
Functional reentry
Period of rotation is usually close to refractoriness time
In a rabbit heart (Allessie 1973):
In a sheep and dog epicardial muscle (Davidenko, Jalife 1973):
--> First to record a real spiral wave
Cell cultures
(lab of L. Glass, neonatal rat cells)
Whole heart of guinea pig (lab of J. Jalife, 2002)
Many other systems also have spiral waves!
Many other systems also have spiral waves!
Many other systems also have spiral waves!
Cable equation
Cable equation
A spiral wave becomes a scroll wave: it can be open or closed
Whole heart simulation: mesh of the heart + fiber orientation
Spiral waves have many different names
Anatomical reentry
Functional reentry = rotors
Torsade de Pointes
Regular
Irregular
Atrial Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation
Ventricular Tachycardia
Regular
Irregular
Atrial Tachycardia
Atrial Fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Tachycardia
Regular
Atrial Tachycardia
Multiple Hypothesis
1. Persistant AF is maintained by rotors
2. Multiple wavelets maintain AF
3. Double layer hypothesis
4. Mother rotor fibrillation
5. Atrial fibrillation driven by micro-anatomic intramural re-entry
Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Tachycardia
Ventricular Fibrillation
Ventricular Fibrillation
How to stop a reentry circuit?
Ablation: burning of tissue
Looks like typical case of flutter?
We can simplify the left atrium by deforming it to a sphere with 3 holes. While maintaining its topological properties!
MV
MV
LPV
RPV
SVC
TV
200 different simulations
All possible virtual ablation lines: 600 simulation
3 Patterns
Complete rotation
Incomplete rotation
Parallel activation
Good entrainment
Bad entrainment
Bad entrainment
3 Patterns
Complete rotation
Incomplete rotation
Parallel activation
Incomplete rotation becomes complete rotation, resulting in a slower AT
100% of simulations!
On a closed surface, the total number of clockwise and counterclockwise rotations must be equal.
Reentries can't be isolated entities. They must come in pairs!
Key insight 1: Reentries can't be isolated entities. They must come in pairs!
Complete rotation
Parallel activation
Incomplete rotation
Critical Boundary
Critical Boundary
Non-Critical Boundary
CB: Santucci et al. JACC EP 2023
CB:
CB:
NCB: 0
Incomplete rotation becomes complete rotation, resulting in a slower AT
Loops come in pairs of 2: currently second loop is always missed
200 simulation with 2 boundaries
Clinical cases
CB:
CB:
NCB: 0
Incomplete rotation becomes complete rotation, resulting in a slower AT
MV
LPV
RPV
200 simulations with 4 boundaries
Clinical cases
131 MRAT cases
20 detailed cases with slowing after ablation
Macro reentry
Localized reentry
Micro reentry
Focal
Rotor
Around anatomic obstacle, like valve or vessels.
Around non conducting area > 2-1.5cm, e.g. scar or functional block
Atypical Flutter (LA involving valves or vessels)
Atypical Flutter (RA involving valves or vessels)
Typical Flutter (clockwise and counter clockwise)
WPW
Atypical Flutter (LA with scar or previous ablation lines with gaps)
AVNRT (considering slow and fast pathway)
Around non conducting area < 1cm, e.g. scar or functional block
Atypical Flutter (LA with scar)
Atypical Flutter (RA crista terminalis region)
Ectopic AT
Spiral activation pattern with no scar in the core.
Focal activation from one single spot with centrifugal activation pattern
CL tends to be longer >350ms due to larger path
CL range varies and CL can shift around 20-40 ms during arrhythmia due to slight path variations
CL tends to be shorter due to short path, whole CL is covered by signals found in a small area like e.g. 4cm2 often a combination of double potentials in the „middle“ and very long fractionated signals surrounding
CL often not presented completely in one chamber
Focal activation patterns could also hint to epicardial entries – look for potential conducting structure like vein of Marshall, Bachmann´s etc. and exits that would fit a macro reentry with epicardial parts
We think non-existent in AT, especially as a stable configuration leading to a stable AT.
Maybe something close to a spiral pattern can exist in AF
AF
Macro reentry
Localized reentry
Micro reentry
Focal
Rotor
Around anatomic obstacle, like valve or vessels.
Around non conducting area > 2-1.5cm, e.g. scar or functional block
Atypical Flutter (LA involving valves or vessels)
Atypical Flutter (RA involving valves or vessels)
Typical Flutter (clockwise and counter clockwise)
WPW
Atypical Flutter (LA with scar or previous ablation lines with gaps)
AVNRT (considering slow and fast pathway)
Around non conducting area < 1cm, e.g. scar or functional block
Atypical Flutter (LA with scar)
Atypical Flutter (RA crista terminalis region)
Ectopic AT
Spiral activation pattern with no scar in the core.
Focal activation from one single spot with centrifugal activation pattern
CL tends to be longer >350ms due to larger path
CL range varies and CL can shift around 20-40 ms during arrhythmia due to slight path variations
CL tends to be shorter due to short path, whole CL is covered by signals found in a small area like e.g. 4cm2 often a combination of double potentials in the „middle“ and very long fractionated signals surrounding
CL often not presented completely in one chamber
Focal activation patterns could also hint to epicardial entries – look for potential conducting structure like vein of Marshall, Bachmann´s etc. and exits that would fit a macro reentry with epicardial parts
We think non-existent in AT, especially as a stable configuration leading to a stable AT.
Maybe something close to a spiral pattern can exist in AF
AF
All of this is replaced by our simple classification!
Upcoming treatment guidelines (EHRA-ESC, HRS), 2026
Changed clinical practice, 2024
Dr. Mattias Duytschaever
Dr. Sebastian Knecht
Hospital Sint-Jan Brugge
Retrospectively and prospective published study
> 2024, 6000 downloads last 6 months
Excitability important for creation of a spiral wave: properties of the single cell!
very low excitability
low excitability
INa
INa
low excitability
INa
high excitability
INa
very high excitability
INa
If wavefront cannot make a complete turn without interaction with the tail of the wave, there will be interaction and thus meandering.
long refractory tail
Ik
Stable spiral
Meandering spiral
Hypothesis:
different types of spirals give rise to different arrhythmias
Very dangerous!!!!
Hypothesis:
different types of spirals give rise to different arrhythmias
Typical in aging heart: more myofibroblast = fibrotic tissue
Spiral waves are attracted by fibrotic tissue
Spiral waves are attracted by fibrotic tissue
In clinic: spiral waves are often found close to fibrotic tissue
Currently, electrophysiologists are already ablating based on computer modeling
Computer modeling is useful to understand arrhythmias, however, only one group in the world (Baltimore) uses modeling to actually treat patients. Still a long way to go...
Computer modeling can however also be used to test new techniques
2. Anatomical reentry
1. Rotors or functional reentry
3. Focal sources
We developed a methodology to determine a sources automatically: we describe the electrical propagation in the heart as a directed network:
DG-mapping
Huge field of applications
Brain
Search algorithm
Network theory
Network theory on the excitation of the heart: concept
Functional reentry
Anatomical reentry
Focal sources
DG-mapping on clinical AT cases
Optimization protocols
New version almost ready open source/source available with restrictions for commercial use
You can create your own pipeline!
www.dgmapping.com
www.dgmapping.com
Modeling can cover even more scales...