Burton, Emanuelle; Goldsmith, Judy; Mattei, Nicholas; Siler, Cory; Swiatek, Sara-Jo. Computing and Technology Ethics: Engaging through Science Fiction (pp. 8-9). MIT Press.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/printing-press
https://news.colgate.edu/magazine/2020/05/01/how-to-survive-in-ancient-greece/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woman_yelling_at_a_cat#/media/File:WomanYellingAtACat_meme.jpg
Often, there is no single best answer. In most cases, every possible choice has trade-offs
Three types of problems:
limited resources
competing types of goals
different ideas about what is good
Burton, Emanuelle; Goldsmith, Judy; Mattei, Nicholas; Siler, Cory; Swiatek, Sara-Jo. Computing and Technology Ethics: Engaging through Science Fiction (pp. 8-9). MIT Press.
Three types of problems:
limited resources
competing types of goals
different ideas about what is good
Three types of problems:
limited resources
What should be done when the demand for something >> how much of it is available?
These issues seem easily solved by using technology to "balance the scales"
e.g. artificial hearts to replace the failing ones, more fuel-efficient cars so that oil is less in demand, or high-yield crops that can feed more people
Often this does not solve the problem completely, because additional costs are introduced with that solution
competing types of goals
different ideas about what is good
Three types of problems:
limited resources
competing types of goals
multiple types of things or goals come into conflict
more than one way to achieve "good"
e.g. you get two job offers, both of which are good, but you need to choose one
different ideas about what is good
Three types of problems:
limited resources
competing types of goal
different ideas about what is good
sometimes people share the same goals but disagree on how to get there
e.g. is nuclear power a good option for the environment or a terrible one? Two environmental advocates with same overall goal (save the planet) can come to different conclusions, disagreeing on how to assess environmental well-being, or on what policies or practices should be changed
these disagreements are often invisible even to the people who are having the argument - they interpret that goal of "save the planet" to mean different things
Deontological: This framework is based on a set of rules such as company rules, government rules, or religious rules such as the Ten Commandments. If the action in question adheres to the rules, it is considered to be the right thing to do in that context.
Utilitarian: There are many varieties of this approach, but the basic idea is that the right thing to do is the thing that brings the most utility, or happiness, to the most people. While the action may help some and hurt others, if the benefits to some outweigh the costs to others, the action is “the right thing.”
Moral intuition: an unreasoned reaction (not unreasonable)
This week we read 3 things:
1. From your observations, how do tech designers and companies currently incorporate (or not incorporate) moral virtues, such as honesty, justice, or empathy, into their design processes? Can you provide examples of technologies where these virtues seem to be evident?
2. Both “Designing a Future Worth Wanting” and “The Gambler” suggest that speed is a reason virtue ethics is a better framework for technology ethics.
a. How does the article argue this point?
b. How does The Gambler reveal this point?
3. How do users typically respond when they feel a technology detracts from their moral or ethical values? Have you noticed any patterns in how individuals or communities push back against technology that is seen as harmful or unethical?
In The Gambler, the “maelstrom” represents a powerful force shaping media content based on public interest and social pressures.
How does this reflect what you’ve observed about how social media platforms and algorithms shape user behavior and decision-making?
Are people aware of how much social pressure influences the content they consume and create?
If you think they’re unaware, how best to educate the public about these effects?
Ong’s cultural background plays a key role in shaping his values and ethics in The Gambler, while his American colleagues seem to operate under different norms.
What does the Virtue Ethics framework say about virtues in terms of cultural and social context?
How do cultural differences influence the ethical decisions people make when engaging with technology or media?
Can you identify examples where different cultural values lead to different behaviors in the digital space?
https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/399569/what-game-is-this-character-creation-screen-from
https://gaming.stackexchange.com/questions/399569/what-game-is-this-character-creation-screen-from
https://integratedethicslabs.org/labs/virtue-ethics/
Confucius (5th century BCE)
Aristotle (340 BCE)
According to virtue ethics
Learning objectives:
Discussion Guidelines:
Reminder: please ensure your reflections are personal to you, rather than the default outputs from an AI.