Hi again, Bert here. Welcome to part 2 of the case study.
Yes, that's right... Another sequel 🤷♂️
We covered a lot of ground in the last part. Let's explore the remaining points!
1. Friction and Fuel Framework
2. Getting Subscribers
3. Overcoming Choice Overload
4. Getting you to binge
Remember our contenders from last time? Here they are again with their grades from part 1.
Disney+ had a fairytale beginning, HBOmax, not so much... 🤦
We have previously explored how our contenders get people to subscribe.
This time we'll see how they move us to the initial step of binging: watching that first video....
...and keep on watching the next one!
And the next, and next... 😅
Let's get ready to roll.
So here's the first step right after we finished the sign-up process for our first contender, Netflix.
We'll now have a Binge Mode Meter 😎 to guide out analysis. Every time a behavior change tool is used to add fuel to a target behavior, the meter will go up. Opposite happens if friction is added. The higher the meter, the more likely that I'll start watching (and never stop).
Remember, when you see the magnifying glass, take a moment to look at the screen and tap on the components where you think the service provide friction or fuel for the target behavior.
Alright, I spy with my little eye a bit of friction here...
Knowing what is expected and what will happen next can be important in deciding whether an action is worth taking.
I'm a laptop person and all, but what if I want to watch it on my (future) PS5? Would be nice to know why I have to set this up now and whether I can add new devices later...
Knowing what is expected and what will happen next can be important in deciding whether an action is worth taking.
How about here?
Bert
Chunking (or breaking down) tasks or information into smaller chunks can make the task feel less overwhelming
Netflix knows many of their users share their accounts with their friends and family. Chunking the steps together makes it easy for user to add the profiles all at once. Smart move!
Bert
Chunking (or breaking down) tasks or information into smaller chunks can make the task feel less overwhelming
However, it would better if Netflix tells me whether I can add more user profile later. Right now, I want to skip to the content...
Bert
Knowing what is expected and what will happen next can be important in deciding whether an action is worth taking.
I hate when my autonomy is limited. It feels like I'm in a damn IKEA warehouse.
Alright, looks like I'll need to add Mrs. Bert right here and now... Oh, what do we have here?
Bert
Mrs. Bert
A quick and easy prompt to select which accounts belong to young audiences – nice! Mrs. Bert and I would certainly want our little Bert Jr. to browse safely.
Bert
Mrs. Bert
Bert Jr.
Next step! I bet you know the type of friction we'll highlight here...
Providing too much information can make one feel too overwhelmed
Yes, looks like we have a bit of a cognitive overload situation here, don't we?
Providing too much information can make one feel too overwhelmed
True, Netflix has a diverse set of users, but bombarding users with all these language options certainly makes me feel a bit overwhelmed...
Providing too much information can make one feel too overwhelmed
Could this be simplified?
Here's my quick attempt using my paint skills...
Other languages
Even better, could Netflix perhaps prompt user to set the language the first time they watch a video? That way the prompt is more timely and relevant.
I hope we're almost there... hmm what's this?
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
Wait, Choice Overload again?! I don't know, it seems like we're a bit too quick to play this card. Are we really sure that less is more in every context?
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
Hold up, we need to get to the bottom of this. Let's put Netflix onboarding to the side for now. It looks like...
...we have a case to solve.
To understand choice overload, there's only one place to start... Have you heard about the "Jam Study"?
Basically, the Jam study* provided shoppers with either 6 or 24 options of jams when they visited the supermarket and studied the effects.
*Iyengar, Sheena & Lepper, Mark. (2001). When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?. Journal of personality and social psychology. 79. 995-1006. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
The result? The second, larger selection of options attracted more traffic. But the smaller version with six options led to 10x times more purchases (!). Clearly, a good argument for why less is more!
*Iyengar, Sheena & Lepper, Mark. (2001). When Choice is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing?. Journal of personality and social psychology. 79. 995-1006. 10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.995.
So less is always more? Nope. If it was, Tim Harford and others have wondered how that explains why Starbucks boasts 80,000+ drink combinations or the seemingly infinite flavors of Ben & Jerry's? Spoiler: it doesn't.
The simple answer is that choices are complex and often guided by context. We might want a handful of options when grabbing a quick lunch, but enjoy browsing long menus over a candle lit dinner.
Not to mention that people's individual preference can differ greatly on these questions. Depending on your product or service, you might have many users with a preference for many choices (hello streaming sites 👋).
A recent meta study on choice overload indeed tells us that "studies fail to come together into a cohesive understanding of when large assortments can benefit choice and when they can be detrimental to choice". Still, there is hope!
*Chernev, Alexander & Bockenholt, Ulf & Goodman, Joseph. (2015). Choice Overload: A Conceptual Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 25. Pages 333–358. 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.002.
The good news is that the same meta-study identified the following four key factors that moderate the impact the number of items have on choice overload.
How big is the difference between options? This includes presence of a dominant option and how complementarity the options are to each other.
How does external factors impact the decision? This includes time constraints, and number of attributes describing each option and how options are presented.
How easy is comparing alternatives?
The degree to which the users understand the benefits of the different options and easily compare the pros and cons.
Do users have a preference for choice? The degree to which users want to minimize the cognitive effort involved in making a choice among the options.
We can simplify these four factors into a simple 5-item checklist to guide us in evaluating scenarios when choice overload could be a big risk.
Is there one option that the user sees as clearly better than the others?
Are options and their attributes presented in a simple way that is easy to see?
Does the user have time to make the decision?
Does the user have the knowledge to easily compare the alternatives?
Does the user explicitly aim to minimize the effort of making a decision?
Case solved. Let's get back now and look at the Netflix screen that started this inquiry.
Back to this page. Let's now review it using our handy Choice Overload Checklist. Firstly, is it easy for users to select the 3 best options?
Difficult to say... which should probably count as a no. However, many of these titles (think The Office) should be assumed to be recognizable by most users. What about the presentation of options?
I like it. Why you ask? Well, this is a fairly manageable subset of the complete library and most are used to browse covers of films (and magazines, albums, etc).
We can also assume most users have enough time.
The main problem here is that it's quite hard to compare and filter options. Just highlighting and sorting based on the genre would go a long way.
Lastly, we can safely assume that users have a strong positive preference for exploring the Netflix library. This screen offers a nice middle ground of presenting the highlights. And yes, mostly Netflix originals. No surprise: Once you start watching them, you can't access them anywhere else 😄
And there we go! We can conclude that this screen is unlikely to cause significant choice overload, and perhaps could even reduce it!
Alright, I've made my three choices. Now, let's finally continue past this screen. Figuring that one out took some time... Let's speed things up!
Hmm, or maybe not... This is taking a lot of time, must mean they are working hard on personalizing my content, right?
Making people wait can rather than giving something instantly can create the perception that the system is working for them.
Making people wait can rather than giving something instantly can create the perception that the system is working for them.
Wrong. It's 2021 and things happen in nanoseconds. This is a great example of the Labor Illusion, and some product designers are likely to blame for the delay (not the programmers). I'll admit that my anticipation just increased!
Okay, we're (finally) in!
I see something clever here!
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
That extra step of choosing a few shows and films actually helps the user curate the first thing to watch right away.
A clever way to reduce choice overload!
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
We don't need a checklist to determine that having my
pre-selected list of 3 options makes it easier to decide.
Alright, this Bridgerton trailer is getting racy, time for me to choose, perhaps something more conservative!
I know the Crown is quite a hit...
Oh what do we have here when I hover over the show...
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
99% Match? I like it! Let's ignore that this is based on my selection on the previous page. It still helps to confirm my pick.
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
Note to mention, I'm definitely liking this one-click play. How easy can it get to watch a show straight from the landing page?
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
Alright, here we go!
The first episode has bit of a slow start, but really high-quality production I'll say...
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
Hmm, but the next episode is already starting... maybe I'll just watch one more.
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
[4 seasons later...] Oh, Diana. So sad indeed.
I give Netflix credit for providing a timely prompt for me to continue, but I think I'll call it a day here.
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
Let's wrap this up quick before that Bridgerton trailer starts playing again!
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
While Netflix had a slow start, it did use my initial peak in motivation to get all of the setup completed. Once that was done, it was easy sailing and auto-play all the way.
A strong Grade B+ to Netflix!
It's getting a bit late... but I take this task seriously. Let's continue to our next contender, shall we?
So right after we signed up for HBOmax, we land on this page...
Bert
Nice to see that they got my name right! Must be from the step I criticized in the previous study.
Bert
Communicate to people by mentioning their name to draw their attention.
Nice to see that they got my name right! Must be from the step I criticized in the previous study.
Alright, let's go in!
Bert
Woah, I'm straight in.
That was quick! Especially compared to Netflix...
What should I watch, hmm...
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
People tend to follow the action of the masses, thinking it must be the correct behavior.
Insomnia TV?
Sounds just like me!
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
People tend to follow the action of the masses, thinking it must be the correct behavior.
Let's see... I'm a little late to the Game of Thrones party, but let me see what this is all about...
ADD
EXPLORE
Lower friction by reducing the required steps to achieve the goal.
Explore and Add...
No one-click play here, eh?
Lower friction by reducing the required steps to achieve the goal.
ADD
EXPLORE
After selection "Explore", I have arrived on series main page...
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
Wait. How do I play? Gosh, I heard I would have to wait for dragons, but I didn't expect to have to wait this long for the play button to appear!
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
Oh there we go, I'll need to hover over the show image. Pretty well hidden, huh?
Information that is novel or stands out is more likely to influence us
I still have to choose between play and add? I've already added the show, why should I even add this episode?
Information that is novel or stands out is more likely to influence us
My two cents here is that people would expect to see only the play button and it would be better if that "add button" is moved elsewhere. Anyway, let's click play and get the show started!
Alright...wait, what??
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
Ads? Hugh Grant? Really? I'm more of a Sean Bean guy... The HBOmax recommendations highlight how little they know about me. Maybe Netflix longer onboarding had some purpose after all...
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
No way, do I really need to make an extra click for full-screen? C'mon... I'm not one to usually complain, but this is ridiculous.
Okay... let's finally see what the Game of Thrones hype is all about!
Alright, I'm already hooked.
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
And I trust in the auto-play...
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
Again, HBOmax with a good start that is quickly squandered. Although getting to start watching included quite a bit of friction, Game of Thrones definitely got me hooked... Grade D to the design, but A to GOT (at least for the first season...).
The Night has ended, but not my Watch... Let's move to our last contender – Disney+!
Here's where we land right after we finish signing-up...
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
Disney+ knows they have very segmented user groups. Grouping shows by these categories on top certainly makes it easier for each user segment finds what they want to watch!
We struggle with making decisions when there is an overload of information. This might lead us to second guess ourselves or postpone the decision.
Let's see what should I watch...
Maybe let's focus on my personal recommendations.
These seems to be all-over the place and certainly doesn't feel personalized. Simpsons? Yes, I'm yellow but who still watches that? Same for Home Alone. Frozen II? No way...
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
Luckily, the Mandalorian actually happen to be another series people have been recommending. Guess I'll have to see what the fuzz is all about!
Just for the record. It should be clear by now that anyone who said keeping up with the latest show is easy hasn't spent a week in my boxer shorts...
Alright, we're on the shows main page...
Information that is novel or stands out is more likely to influence us
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
Although there's extra step, the play button is visible and clear on the series main page. This seem almost too obvious to reward, but then again we just saw HBOmax missing this...
Information that is novel or stands out is more likely to influence us
Providing an effective call to action helps users know what they should do next.
..and immediately we go to full-screen!
Two clicks from landing page to watching Star Wars - not bad!
Just finished the first episode. I need to see more of that Baby Yoda!
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
Right to the next episode we go!
Preselected options tend to remain selected because of the effort required to modify them. The default is the course of action that occurs if nothing is specified by the decision maker.
Wow, lucky that was only two seasons, otherwise I'd be stuck binging for days. Great show! And nice recommendation at the end.
Personalising the experience or intervention can help meet user's specific needs, goals, and preferences.
I'll be nice and not penalize them for this, but as you can see, I literally have no other choice then pressing play! 😂 You'd expect I could at least choose to go back to the dashboard...
Who says you can't go far keeping it simple? While certainly the personalization could be improved, Disney+ was pretty smooth sailing. Well done, Mickey!
Alright, I have spent a bit too much time on these streaming services... This has truly been a long binge war. Ready to see who won this part?
Alright! The winner is....
NETFLIX!
CASE STUDY COMPLETED
Well done, you've now completed part 2 of this case study! 🎉
Who did you think was the winner overall?
Share your pick in the Behavior Slack! 🏆
This case study was created by Sam & Ladasa (while I was busy watching TV shows).
Click on their pictures to give them some love.
Ladasa is a graduate of the Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences program from University of Pennsylvania and currently a Product Manager at JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Samuel you probably know by now, he's the founder of Habit Weekly and works with supporting value-driven organizations to apply behavioral science.
Please complete this 1-min survey to help us further improve these case studies. Thanks! 😊