10
10
Pros:
Easy (integrated with registrar)
Free (well, maybe not a "pro" after all!)
Cons:
Notable DNS timeouts from US-Midwest and overseas
Not really that bad, but we can do better with Route 53
Pros:
Highly reliable and distributed
Used by Amazon itself (CF NS = *.awsdns.com)
Great CF integration (zone apex aliases - Phase II)
Branding improvement over GoDaddy
Neutrals:
VE public sites already rely on cloudfront.net + CF
VE private sites will rely on Amz instead of GD (meh)
Weaknesses:
Extremely simplified feature set (some rarely used DNS features missing, e.g. multiple TXT records)
No export via GUI, only via API
No IXFR/AXFR
Core Zone:
Web Stub Zone:
(Highly informal/internal classifications!)
NS change is graceful and automatically propagates
No urgency to leaving GoDaddy
No dependency between zones, so can be migrated one-at-a-time
Zones were imported as-is (except for SOA and NS adjustments, of course) so same records and TTLs
Introduce CloudFront distribution aliases in place of @ A 1.2.3.4 records: greatly improves manageability
Clean up bad records (old ISA IP, etc.)
Delete some unused zones completely (?)
Where a public IP is referenced in the AD (internal) copy of a zone, make a stub zone instead
Allows some records to be managed @ Route 53 while also having internal-only records within vaneck.com
Still won't work for the zone apex, though