"The combination of increased access with the development of powerful digital searching tools has the potential to transform the nature and the scale of students’ relationship to the material itself. For the first time perhaps it allows the novice learner to get into the archives and engage in the kinds of archival activities that only expert learners used to be able to do."
Randy Bass and Roy Rosenzweig, "Rewiring the Social Studies Classroom," (Dec. 1999).
"In numerous cases, interviewees demonstrated their organization processes by showing the physical and digital “piles” of sources that made up a chapter. Many scholars had stacks of index cards, paper notes, and print-outs of sources organized by chapter. In one case, an interviewee showed the file boxes (representing chapters) with tabs (representing sections) containing individual index cards (representing notes or ideas) by which a book is being organized; another shared the bookshelf on which he kept his last book, with each chapter’s
Schonfeld and Rutner, ITHAKA S+R, 2012
https://sr.ithaka.org/publications/supporting-the-changing-research-practices-of-historians/
Sam Wineburg, “Thinking Like a Historian,” http://www.loc.gov/teachers/tps/quarterly/historical_thinking/article.html
Tim Sherratt
Use URIs as names for things
Use HTTP URIs so that people can look up those names.
When someone looks up a URI, provide useful information, using the standards
Include links to other URIs. so that they can discover more things.
Tim Berners-Lee (2006),
Who are they and what kinds of inquiry questions do they bring? (aside from technical capacity)
What are their commitments and values?
How do our approaches to data creation and representation change when the data can be loosed from the initial record and the full context of creation?
What have we done to recognize and mitigate the fact that the human subject protections of our institutional administrations are really just baseline considerations, rather than deeply considered ethical engagements and commitments?
How do our ethical concerns interface with our choice of infrastructure and our descriptive approaches?
How do our platforms support or hinder the effort to strike a balance between ethical concerns and access?
What standards and constraints are built into the architecture?
How are we choosing and developing our controlled vocabularies (LCSH, Traditional Knowledge Labels, custom vocabularies, community generated)?
How transparent are we about how and why we are making these decisions? (codebook; documentation)