Sharon M. Leon
Digital public historian working on the stories of the enslaved people owned and sold by the Maryland Province Jesuits
Director of the On These Grounds project, an effort to develop an ontology to describe the lived experiences of those enslaved who worked at colleges & universities.
Chief Operating Officer for Digital Scholar and director of the Omeka family of web publishing platforms
Institutional enslavement: churches, businesses, and schools
Recovering the history of educational institutions that employed and benefited from enslaved labor
Part of the larger campus histories movement
Brophy, Alfred L. University, Court, and Slave: Pro-Slavery Thought in Southern Colleges and Courts and the Coming of Civil War. Oxford University Press, 2016.
Curran, R. Emmett. “‘Splendid Poverty’: Jesuit Slaveholding in Maryland, 1805-1838.” In Catholics in the Old South: Essays on Church and Culture, edited by Jon L. Wakelyn and Randall M. Miller, 125–46. Mercer University Press, 1983.
Harris, Leslie M., James T. Campbell, and Alfred L. Brophy. Slavery and the University: Histories and Legacies. University of Georgia Press, 2019.
McInnis, Maurie D., Kirt von Daacke, Louis P. Nelson, and Benjamin Ford. Educated in Tyranny: Slavery at Thomas Jefferson’s University. University of Virginia Press, 2019.
Oast, Jennifer. Institutional Slavery: Slaveholding Churches, Schools, Colleges, and Businesses in Virginia, 1680-1860. 1 edition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Rothman, Adam, and Elsa Barraza Mendoza. Facing Georgetown’s History: A Reader on Slavery, Memory, and Reconciliation. Georgetown University Press, 2021.
White, Deborah G., and Marisa J. Fuentes, eds. Scarlet and Black: Slavery and Disposession in Rutgers History. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2016.
Wilder, Craig Steven. Ebony and Ivy: Race, Slavery, and the Troubled History of America’s Universities. Reprint edition. Bloomsbury Press, 2014.
"Doing truly embodied and data-rich histories of slavery requires similarly remixing conceptual, discursive, and archival geographies, with deliberate, pained intimacy, and, likely, some violence. But black digital practice challenges slavery scholars and digital humanists to feel this pain and infuse their work with a methodology and praxis that centers the descendants of the enslaved, grapples with the uncomfortable, messy, and unquantifiable, and in doing so, refuses disposability."
What questions, comments, and reactions do you have to the piece?
Feel free to pick a fight with me :)