Through the Lens of Data:

The Enslaved People Owned and Sold by the Maryland Province Jesuits

Sharon M. Leon

@sharonmleon

Loyola University | February 22, 2019

all our married people who had married out of our farms, have been sold to the masters of their husbands or wifes, or to the next neighbors of them, so that husbands & wives are together, but some children who could not be sold with their mothers, have been sent with the others to Louisiana. There remain in our farms only few old people, well provided for their life times. So old Isaac remained at W. Marsh

Fidelis Grivel to Charles Lancaster, May 4, 1839

Old Isaac Remained

Isaac Hawkins Hall (Mulledy Hall)

Thomas Mulledy

The Hawkins Family

Jesuit Plantation Project

slaveryarchive.georgetown.edu

Working with the Data of Slavery

The Enslaved Group

  • 1,140 individuals owned by the Jesuits (1717-1840)
    • 587 individuals with birth years
  • 30 enslaved people owned by others
  • 32 free Blacks

Relationships in the Records

  • 108 inferred partnerships (216 individuals)
    • 13 sacramental marriages
  • 394 identified parental relationship
    • 86 baptisms
    • 141 births
  • 57 deaths indicated
    • 12 deaths with specific date
[1802 Dr St. Thomas's Manor in acct with Cash]
[1803]
[Jan]
26     To cash from Henny for 3 barrels corn @ $2   6.00  2.5.0
April 22    To Cash recd for sale of negro Constant, property of N.L. Sewall's estate  101.10.0

[opposite folio 1802 Contra Cr.]
[1803]
[Jan]
10    By do to do (the Taylor C. Layman) for making a servant's great coat  0.12.6
April 22  By Do [cash] to Mrs. Dorothy Digges for negro woman Jenny & her child  85.0.0


Derived data

  • Hand generated from document transcriptions
  • Individuals and relationships processed to People with Unique ID, and then de-dupped
  • Appearances processed to Events with participants
  • Event types: birth, baptism, marriage, death, inventory, health, sale, legal, labor, commerce, conditions, travel, punishment, run away
  • Imported to Omeka S to publish LOD

Linked Open Data

  • Each entity has a unique resource identifier (URI)
  • Those URIs are served over the web
  • Descriptive data about those entities is served using standards
  • Those standards make that data interoperable and promote aggregation and integration of material across the web

Change over Place & Time

Estate Total Enslaved Workers Indoors Fields Child/Elderly
St. Inigoe's Manor 20 12 3 9 8
Newtown 29 15 3 12 14
St. Thomas's Manor 38 21 3 18 17
White Marsh 65 29 3 26 36
St. Joseph's Manor 7 5 1 4 2
St. Marie's Manor 7 4 1 3 3
Bohemia Manor 26 15 3 12 11
Total 192 101 17 84 91

George Hunter's 1765 Survey

Family Growth

Social Network Analysis ?

Questions about using SNA

  • What does it mean to analyze a community that is bounded and has very little control over their inclusion/movement?
  • With a significantly incomplete data set, what is the threshold at which social network analysis is revealing?

  • What are the appropriate visualizations to provide an entry point to this medium-sized collection of data points?

Newtown Community

Social Network Analysis Measurements

  • Average Degree: Average number of connections
  • Density: Inclusiveness (total number of points minus the isolated ones) and the sum of the degrees of its points 
  • Average Path Length: average number of edges from one point to another
Place Average Degree Density Average Path
White Marsh + Fingale 1.775 0.006 1.987
St. Thomas + Port Tobacco 1.808 0.011 1.671
 
Newtown 2.317 0.012 4.061
St. Inigoes 0.409 0.002 1.619
Bohemia 0.49 0.005 1.107

Maybe Simple is Better

Freedom Status Transactions

What's Next?

  • Everyday condition events
  • Health and sickness events
  • Labor events
  • Transfers, runaways, and punishment events
  • A narrative!