By Simon Hettrick
ORCID: 0000-0002-6809-5195
www.rsg.soton.ac.uk
@RSGSoton
www.software.ac.uk
@SoftwareSaved
*Refs [1-3]
Use
software
Fundamental to
results
Time spent coding
Primarily self-taught
69%
92%
30%
90%
An in-house data reduction program introduced a change in sign for anomalous differences. This program... converted the anomalous pairs... thereby introducing a sign change."
code for the Ariane 4 rocket is reused in the Ariane 5... The error is in the code that converts a 64-bit floating-point number to a 16-bit signed integer. The faster engines cause the 64-bit numbers to be larger in the Ariane 5 than in the Ariane 4, triggering an overflow condition...
...[the] backup computer crashes, followed 0.05 seconds later by a crash of the primary computer.
Automate repetitive tasks
Track and share code
Use a high-level language
Test your code
Command line
Version control
Python
Unit testing
------
-----------
-----
--------------------
#! /bin/bash #Initialise a counter count=1 #Make new dir mkdir NewImgDir #Loop through file, copy and rename for i in *.jpg do cp $i NewImgDir/"EventPhoto_"$count".jpg" count=$(( count + 1 )) done
If it's not tested, it's broken
References
[1] "It's impossible to conduct research without software, say 7 out of 10 UK researchers"http://www.software.ac.uk/blog/2014-12-04-its-impossible-conduct-research-without-software-say-7-out-10-uk-researchers
[2] Hannay JE, Langtangen HP, MacLeod C, Pfahl D, Singer J, et al.. (2009) How do scientists develop and use scientific software? In: Proceedings Second International Workshop on Software Engineering for Computational Science and Engineering. pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/SECSE.2009.5069155.
[3] Prabhu P, Jablin TB, Raman A, Zhang Y, Huang J, et al.. (2011) A survey of the practice of computational science. In: Proceedings 24th ACM/IEEE Conference on High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis. pp. 19:1–19:12. doi:10.1145/2063348.2063374.
[4] "Retraction" http://www.sciencemag.org/content/314/5807/1875.2.long
[5] Stefik A, Siebert A, Stefik M, Slattery M, "An empirical comparison of the accuracy rates of novices using the quorum, perl, and randomo programming languages", Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Evaluation and usability of programming languages and tools
Pages 3-8