A View of LUX from the
Library Catalog
Tim Thompson
Librarian for Applied Metadata Research
Yale University Library
timothy.thompson@yale.edu
www.linkedin.com/in/timathompson
October 29, 2024
Acknowledgment
- Thanks to Francis Lapka (YCBA), Rob Sanderson, Kelly Davis, Library IT, members of the Linked Library Data Advisory Group, and others for evaluating, discussing, and iteratively improving the library’s metadata mappings from MARC to Linked Art.
Library Reference Model (LRM)
LRMoo (object-oriented)
LRM + CRM
Source: LRMoo specification.
Issues
-
Entity resolution, data quality
-
Agent modeling
- Alignment and assignment of information between Objects and Works
Issues
-
Entity resolution, data quality -
Agent modeling - Alignment and assignment of information between Objects and Works
- Item
Object
Work
- Work
- Expression
- Manifestation
Current Mappings
- Manifestation
- Item
Object
Work
- Work
- Expression
Proposed Mappings
Challenges
- Item- or manifestation-specific roles must be differentiated.
- Item-specific notes must be mapped to holdings locations + call numbers.
- Item-specific provenance or genre headings may be difficult to match.
- Manifestation-level physical descriptions may not apply to all items.
Thank You!
Questions?
Tim Thompson