Preparation
...instead of as a production code
How can you improve?
Below is the feedback for the assignment:
1. Hover on cancel is too small.
2. Clicking outside the modal does not close the modal
3. Hover on "Add Investor" makes the button smaller
4. CSS misaligned with the spec.
Example 1
-Most features aren't implemented, the few that are aren't working well. (For instance, search doesn't look for partial name or lower/upper case. Or add investment is added to the db but not in the UI)
-Not responsive on wide or small screen
-Many UX issues; things not centered
Example 2
- Missing test cases that could have proven/disproven a function worked as intended
- Not knowing how a function worked that you used (.map)
- Return type differed to what you thought was being returned (false vs undefined)
- Saying that an input was invalid when it was valid
Example 3
A lot of candidates struggle to articulate the technical aspect of what they have done in their previous expereince and how they have solved a given assignmnet/problem
How can you improve?
Partners are interested in the thought process that candidates display in solving problems and logical thinking.
There have been cases where candidates have got the right answer, but they were rejected because of the code (they failed to understand why or how a certain code is written)
How can you improve?
Partners have indicated that rejected candidates do not have strong basics in Javascript, React, Node, HTML/CSS
How can you improve?
Rejected candidates have not been able to clear the DS Algo round
Partners have also mentioned that some candidates have weak/average DS Algo skills
How can you improve?
Candidates need more exposure to solving problems and become faster in solving them in the given timeframe
Rejected candidates have mentioned they were unable to solve problems in the given time
How can you improve?