Andrew Beam, PhD
Department of Epidemiology
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
twitter: @AndrewLBeam
In class assignment:
PERCEPTRON BY HAND
Let's say we'd like to have a single neural learn a simple function
y
X1 | X2 | y |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
Observations
How do we make a prediction for each observations?
y
X1 | X2 | y |
---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 1 |
1 | 0 | 1 |
1 | 1 | 1 |
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
Observations
For the first observation:
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
For the first observation:
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
First compute the weighted sum:
For the first observation:
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
First compute the weighted sum:
Transform to probability:
For the first observation:
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
First compute the weighted sum:
Transform to probability:
Round to get prediction:
Putting it all together:
Assume we have the following values
w1 | w2 | b |
---|---|---|
1 | -1 | -0.5 |
X1 | X2 | y | h | p | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 0 | -0.5 | 0.38 | 0 |
0 | 1 | 1 | -1.5 | 0.18 | 0 |
1 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | .62 | 1 |
1 | 1 | 1 | -0.5 | 0.38 | 0 |
Fill out this table
Let's define how we want to measure the network's performance.
There are many ways, but let's use squared-error:
Let's define how we want to measure the network's performance.
There are many ways, but let's use squared-error:
Now we need to find values for that make this error as small as possible
Our perceptron performs the following computations
And we want to minimize this quantity
Our perception performs the following computations
And we want to minimize this quantity
We'll compute the gradients for each parameter by "back-propagating" errors through each component of the network
For we need to compute
Computations
Loss
To get there, we will use the chain rule
This is "backprop"
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Let's break it into pieces
Computations
Loss
Putting it all together
1) Compute the gradient for
2) Update
is the learning rate
For some number of iterations we will:
3) Repeat until "convergence"
Gradient for
Gradient for
Gradient for
Update for
Update for
Update for
is the learning rate
Training neural nets = large matrix multiplications
GPUs = Massively parallel linear algebra devices
Special computer chips known as graphics processing units (GPUs) make training huge models on large data tractable
CPUs
1000s of number crunchers
GPUs
General
Purpose
Computation
One of the biggest problems with neural networks is overfitting.
Regularization schemes combat overfitting in a variety of different ways
Learning means solving the following optimization problem:
where f(X) = neural net output
One way to regularize is introduce penalties and change
to
One way to regularize is introduce penalties and change
A familiar why to regularize is introduce penalties and change
to
where R(W) is often the L1 or L2 norm of W. These are the well known ridge and LASSO penalties, referred to as weight decay by neural net community
We can limit the size of the L2 norm of the weight vector:
where
We can limit the size of the L2 norm of the weight vector:
where
We can do the same for the L1 norm. What do these penalties do?
L1 and L2 penalties shrink the weights towards 0
L2 Penalty
L1 Penalty
Friedman, Jerome, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. The elements of statistical learning. Vol. 1. New York: Springer series in statistics, 2001.
L1 and L2 penalties shrink the weights towards 0
Friedman, Jerome, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. The elements of statistical learning. Vol. 1. New York: Springer series in statistics, 2001.
L1 and L2 penalties shrink the weights towards 0
Friedman, Jerome, Trevor Hastie, and Robert Tibshirani. The elements of statistical learning. Vol. 1. New York: Springer series in statistics, 2001.
Why is this a "good" idea?
Often, we will inject noise into the neural network during training. By far the most popular way to do this is dropout
Often, we will inject noise into the neural network during training. By far the most popular way to do this is dropout
Given a hidden layer, we are going to set each element of the hidden layer to 0 with probability p each SGD update.
One way to think of this is the network is trained by bagged versions of the network. Bagging reduces variance.
One way to think of this is the network is trained by bagged versions of the network. Bagging reduces variance.
Others have argued this is an approximate Bayesian model
Many have argued that SGD itself provides regularization
The weights in a neural network are given random values initially
The weights in a neural network are given random values initially
There is an entire literature on the best way to do this initialization
The weights in a neural network are given random values initially
There is an entire literature on the best way to do this initialization
- Normal
- Truncated Normal
- Uniform
- Orthogonal
- Scaled by number of connections
- etc
Try to "bias" the model into initial configurations that are easier to train
Try to "bias" the model into initial configurations that are easier to train
Very popular way is to do transfer learning
Try to "bias" the model into initial configurations that are easier to train
Very popular way is to do transfer learning
Train model on auxiliary task where lots of data is available
Try to "bias" the model into initial configurations that are easier to train
Very popular way is to do transfer learning
Train model on auxiliary task where lots of data is available
Use final weight values from previous task as initial values and "fine tune" on primary task
However, the key advantage of neural nets is the ability to easily include properties of the data directly into the model through the network's structure
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a prime example of this (Kun will discuss CNNs)
With a small change, we can turn our perceptron model into a multilayer perceptron
MLPs learn a set of nonlinear features directly from data
"Feature learning" is the hallmark of deep learning approachs
Let's set up the following MLP with 1 hidden layer that has 3 hidden units:
Each neuron in the hidden layer is going to do exactly the same thing as before.
Computations are:
Computations are:
Output layer weight derivatives
Computations are:
Output layer weight derivatives
Computations are:
Hidden layer weight derivatives
Output layer weight derivatives
Computations are:
Hidden layer weight derivatives
Output layer weight derivatives
(if we use a sigmoid activation function)
Forward pass = computing probability from input
Forward pass = computing probability from input
Backward pass = computing derivatives from output
Forward pass = computing probability from input
Backward pass = computing derivatives from output
Hidden layers are often called "dense" layers