Do college students' motivations behind using LinkedIn vary across social classes?
Do very rich students abstain because they
feel it is unnecessary, or is this more common among lower class students because of an intimidation factor?
Additionally, does a student's level of comfort in reaching out to weak ties through the platform vary based on class?
1. Research Question
My research focuses on the motivations behind using LinkedIn through the lens of
different social classes across college students. Do LinkedIn members motivations for utilizing the platform differ significantly by social class? What can these findings say about income inequality in the United States, and what can these findings indicate about how different social classes leverage their networks? Is a working class student less comfortable reaching out to a weak tie?
- Sacks and Graves: Situational Usefulness
- Schraide: Digital Production Gap
Importance & Relation to Literature
Research Methods
LinkedIn Usage largely does not vary widely across social classes, but the lower income students surveyed indicated increased motivation in using the platform (due in part to desired class mobilization). Most of those who did not use the platform were higher income students who "hadn't gotten around to it yet"--contrasting the notion of a lower class "intimidation factor".
There are limitations to these results due to sample size.
Findings
Specific Evidence
However, data indicates support for lower class desired mobility
Alternative Interpretation
Importance in Relation to Literature
Sacks and Graves: "How Many 'Friends' Do you Need?" (how much relied on social media)
Schradie: Digital Production Gap (content gap across classes)
Papacharissi’s “The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and ASmallWorld” (self presentation across platforms)
Concluding Remarks