Analytical urban models circulation: towards reusable building blocks

Clémentine Cottineau

Assistant Professor of Urban Studies

c.cottineau@tudelft.nl

 

 

 

LISER Research Seminar, 25 October 22

Urban models

To help understand, visualise, analyse and plan future cities

Simplifications of urban reality, representation of social processes

Middle ground between general and particular

Useful for comparison and hybridation

 

>> Prone to circulation

 

Types of models

- theoretical ideas about what cities are and how they function

- normative practices about how we should plan and build cities

- analytical representations to study and simulate the structure and evolution of cities

Urban model circulation

- theoretical ideas about what cities are and how they function

>>> Knowledge on knowledge literature

 

- normative practices about how we should plan and build cities

>>> Policy transfer and Policy mobilities literature

 

- analytical representations to study and simulate the structure and evolution of cities

 

>>> Do they circulate like urban policies?

Research questions

1. What is the importance of contingent elements of context on the design and circulation of analytical urban models?

 

2. What are the (unforeseen) consequences of urban models' im/mobility on our understanding of cities?

 

3. What happens to analytical urban models and their reception during their circulation across geographical and disciplinary boundaries?

Literature

Policy Transfer (political science)

> e.g. Dolowitz & March, 2000

 

- Typically international

- Fixed policy before/after

- Factors of success/failure

- Transfer type

 

 

Policy Mobilities (geography)

> e.g. Theodore & Peck, 2010

 

- Typically inter-city / global-local

- Policy as assemblages changing during circulation

- Focus on actors of circulation

- Mobility / immobility / return, etc.

 

 

Relevance for analytical urban models

1. Because urban models circulation reflects the embeddedness of actors in power relations rather than rational choice

 

  • Difference in resources, capital, influence and legitimacy to spread the model and convince various audiences

  • Inertia of "classic" model becoming "off-the-shelf" solutions

 

 

Relevance for analytical urban models

2. Because representations of cities are situated and linked to particular contexts and individual agents of circulation

 

  • Influence of particular context on model content

  • Ethnographic methods of following to understand them

 

 

Relevance for analytical urban models

3. Because models of cities, just like urban policies, are assemblages which change in content and interpretation as they circulation

 

  • Socio-materiality of urban models (what they are made of)

  • Path-dependency of what circulates and how it is remembered

 

 

Data & Methods

Reflexive method to follow analytical models' circulation:

  • Choose 8 classical models

  • Define 4 comparative categories of analysis

  • Invite scholars related to the models to present their circulation according to the comparative categories of analysis

  • Set up seminar series and legacy (recorded videos + edited podcast) to collect information (data)

  • Analyse and compare models in scientific article

 

 

Seminar schedule

Selecting "data"

Criteria for choose models and presenters:

  • Models should reflect the diversity of urban modelling

  • Models should reflect the diversity of modelling formalisms

  • Models should be "classics", i.e. having circulated widely

  • Presenters should have diverse sources of academic legitimacy (having created the model, reviewed it, developed it or taught it)

 

 

Selected models

Selecting "categories"

In line with following and situation analysis methods (McCann & Ward, 2012), the categories chosen are:

  • The model (aim, goal, components, mechanisms)

  • The biography (of creator, model circulation in geographical and academic space)

  • Influence on urban studies (through replication, development, adaptation, ideas, critique)

  • Influence on urban policy (through application to existing cities)

 

 

Seminar legacy

Podcast

Videos

Manuscript in writing...

Results

Comparative results:

  • along 4 categories of analysis (model, biography, urban studies, policy)

  • with a particular focus on 2 models for each category

 

 

1. The Models

Models Issue/aim Actors/Features Main finding
CPT explain size, number and spatial distribution of cities population, demand/ supply, transports few principles lead to regular nested hexagons
Alonso Formalise urban centrality households, landlords, jobs, transports, houses trade-off in consumption explains density decrease
Economic Base Theory explain local economic development industries, production, cities, income flow local development through exports
Fractals new geometry for irregular objects shapes, land use, dimensions fractals to understand multi scale organisation of space 
EEG spatialise evolutionary eco industries, relatedness relatedness > diversity
Schelling unintentional segregation agents, cells, tolerance segregation with tolerance
Forrester positive and negative feedback in cities population, jobs, stocks, flows logistic growth of cities because capacitateed
Utilitarian models measure "happiness" and maximise it collectively individual, collective cost, benefit maximising total utility does not achieve collective utility

1. Focus

  • Monocentric city model. Deductive presentation of models' assumptions by J. Delloye. Crucial to understand that function centrality is assumed, morphological is derived in Alonso's model. 

  • Fractals. Presentation by C. Tannier of self similarity, fractal objects and dimensions, then how fractal generators can simulate urban-like morphologies.

 

Heterogeneous nature and materiality of models:

> monocentric model as unique/formal source (Alonso's 1964 book)

> factal models as "assemblages" (ideas, measurement protocols, etc.)

2. The Biographies

Models Creation context Reception Circulation
CPT Christaller's thesis 1932 critical in 1930s Germany because too theoretical through IGU, quant turn & English translation (66)
Alonso Alonso's thesis 1964 Muth (1969), Mills (1970) New Urban Economics
Economic Base Theory Early 20th century. Hoyt or Sombart? Positive, with challenge from input-output model continuous additions and empirical tests
Fractals Mandelbrot, 1980s aesthetic fascination from maths to everywhere
EEG Martin, Boschma & Frenken, 1990-2000 in regional science and complexity economics very rapidly from academia to european policy agenda
Schelling Sakoda 1949 / Schelling 1970 turn of fate for the models Through Schelling's reputation as strategist
Forrester 1971 book, MIT "out of the blue"  Club of Rome + reputation
Utilitarian models Bentham, 1789 ? Wide diffusion. Ex. Cost-benefit analysis

2. Focus

  • Central Place Theory. Influence of WWII and Christaller's political affiliations on model reception, but also momentum from quantitative geography and translation into English.

  • Urban dynamics. Importance of Forrester's academic position at MIT (after working on computer projects for the military), and later Club of Rome. Isolated in urban modelling but fresh approach from electrical engineering and problem oriented > new approach

 

Heterogeneous source of modelling choices and circulation:

> engineering aspect of Urban Dynamics because of Forrester's educ.

> graphical elegance to convince regional planners with opposite goals

3. Influence urban studies

Models Relays Evolution Transfer/diffusion/mobility
Christaller Regional science pioneers + Baskin  from regional planning to baseline & networks Mobility 
Alonso New Urban Economics from housing market (eco) to density profile (geo) Diffusion / Transfer
Economic Base Theory Isard, Tiebout, Davezies From export oriented to residential development Mobility
Fractals Frankhauser, Batty description to generation Transfer/Diffusion/mobility
EEG Hidalgo/Hausmann from local to relational capabilities Mobility
Schelling Benenson&Hatna abstract to empirical city Mobility
Forrester LUTI modellers application to dynamics Transfer
Utilitarian models Multiple from positive to normative analysis Diffusion

3. Influence urban studies

  • Economic Base Theory. Story of a model with unknown origin but history of adoptions/adaptations by multiple authors. Even to the point where model adapted to reach opposite conclusions 

  • Schelling. Simple model for simple result. Many adaptations show that qualitative behaviour of the model is very robust. 

 

Opportunity of model influence in urban studies:

> memorable qualitative result mark how urban scholars think about cities

> versatile tool to analyse scenarios quantitatively.

4. Influence urban policy

Models Urban policy use Applications Recognition
Christaller plan location + size of urban centres Dutch polders, Israel, China Implicit
Alonso effect of commuting costs on sprawl LUTI models Implicit
Economic Base Theory Design export support policy or infrastructure investment Multiplier effect of export investment on employment ?
Fractals Settlement development plan design Besançon explicit
EEG Diversity economic specialisation EU Implicit
Schelling Housing policy Singapore Implicit
Forrester avoid resource over-expoloitation ? ?
Utilitarian models Optimise cost-benefit performance Most planning project evaluation varies

4. Influence urban policy

  • Evolutionary Economic Geography. Used by EU regional planning to support related industry development. Helps decision on development direction (towards more complex related industries)

  • Utilitarian models. Used to maximise total (aggregated) utility, but through suboptimal collective equilibrium. Need for distributional considerations.

 

Recognition usually implicit, through long chain of influence and appropriation by urban scholars, consultants, advisors and policy makers. Long and tortuous feedback from applications to model evaluation.

Discussion

Contingent factors of model success:

  • Creator's language & translation hurdles (partial-incomplete & partial-ideological)

  • Geographical inequality in circulation power (access to time, budget, media, translation, cultural capital etc.)

  • Disciplinary origin and corresponding legitimacy + audience

  • Gender power imbalance in academia

  • Institutional labelling (policy mobility) > Path dependency (analytical urban models)

 

 

Discussion

Essential factors of model success:

  • Model's simplicity & clearly defined issue

  • Transparency of key hypothesis

  • Transportability of model (i.e. relevance and applicability to other case studies, sites, issues & disciplines)

  • Formal presentation (graphical, mathematical) can work both ways.

 

 

Conclusion

Analytical urban models' content and circulation is contingent on their creation and reception context. Need to travel with their metadata!

 

Need to question contingent elements and path-dependency influence in model circulation to keep essential components and adapt them to new uses

 

Metadata and context information = crucial to keep models and model results meaningful and useful as building blocks.

 

 

 

Perspectives

Reusable Building Blocks for inequality and segregation modelling.

> New ERC starting grant grant: SEGUE / 2022-2027

 

Combining theories and models from economics, sociology and geography to explain linked evolution of economic inequality urban segregation.

  • analyse model components, actors, scales, main finding

  • combine them into modular infrastructure

  • initialise on synthetic population using exhaustive individual register data from NL

  • simulate multiple mechanisms of inequality and segregation

  • evaluate model against empirical data

  • provide multiscale scenarios of urban economic segregation reduction

 

Recruitment in progress!

Analytical urban models circulation & economic segregation

Clémentine Cottineau

@clementinecttn / @urbanmodseminar

c.cottineau@tudelft.nl

 

 

 

https://slides.com/clementinecottineau/an-evolution-of-analytical-urban-models-and-geosimulation-dbc0e0

Thank you!

Made with Slides.com