Dr. Clémentine Cottineau, , Centre Maurice Halbwachs
Seminar at 28th October 2019
% income
% pop
Gini
Analysed for citizens
spaceless countries
Economic segregation
analysed for single cities
The distribution of groups in the country (inequality) constrains the group composition of each city
Neighbourhood effects affect the individual incomes and thus the overall distribution
Schooling
Health
Inheritance
Housing
Population outside cities
Effect of space on income
Interaction at city level
Interaction at national level
Feedback loops of capital
Intermediate level of analysis
The urban landscape
as a dynamic field
Population outside cities
Effect of space on income
Interaction at city level
Interaction at national level
Feedback loops of capital
Intermediate level of analysis
The urban landscape
as a dynamic field
Population outside cities
Effect of space on income
Interaction at city level
Interaction at national level
Feedback loops of capital
Intermediate level of analysis
Delineating cities
Linking all scales dynamically
Institutional and political boundary
Physical limits
of built-up area
Functional areas of
integrated urban society
Paris
10 km
30 km
~100 km
Zipf's Law
Rosen & Resnick, 1980
Soo, 2005
+ Cottineau, 2017
Urban Scaling laws
Arcaute et al. 2015
+ Cottineau et al., 2017
+ Finance & Cottineau, 2018
Agglomeration Economies
Briant et al., 2010
Meijers & Burger, 2017
+ Cottineau et al., 2018
Social networks, mobility & segregation
Cottineau & Vanhoof, 2019
Urban morphology & segregation
Spielman & Harrison, 2013
+ Raimbault et al., 2018
Work in progress
with J. Delloye, U. Lux.
A library of explanatory mechanisms
A multi-model to simulate them
Methods to explore and select sub-models behaviour
Network theory as a tool to detect multi-scale clusters
From geoindustrial clusters
to segregation clusters
cf. https://unequalread.hypotheses.org/
1 book review every 2 months
Mechanism | Temporal scale | Spatial scale |
---|---|---|
Unequal return rate on wealth ('Rich get richer') | month / year | (inter-) national |
Intergenerational inheritance and demographic growth | decade | national |
Redistribution through income tax and welfare | year / decade | national / local |
Public education and health services | year / decade | national / urban |
Social norms and family aspirations | year / decade | local |
cf. https://unequalread.hypotheses.org/
1 book review every 2 months
Mechanism | Temporal scale | Spatial scale |
---|---|---|
Unequal return rate on wealth ('Rich get richer') | month / year | (inter-) national |
Intergenerational inheritance and demographic growth | decade | national |
Redistribution through income tax and welfare | year / decade | national / local |
Public education and health services | year / decade | national / urban |
Social norms and family aspirations | year / decade | local |
cf. https://unequalread.hypotheses.org/
Mechanism | Temporal scale | Spatial scale |
---|---|---|
Contextual / Neighbourhood effects | month - decade | urban / local |
Housing market segmentation and sprawl | year / decade | urban |
Gentrification and sorting effects | year / decade | urban / local |
Public housing functionning and the 'right to buy' | decade | national / urban |
Job market and spatial mismatch | year / decade | national / urban |
Economies of agglomeration & production profile | year / decade | interurban |
1 book review every 2 months
cf. https://unequalread.hypotheses.org/
Mechanism | Temporal scale | Spatial scale |
---|---|---|
Contextual / Neighbourhood effects | month - decade | urban / local |
Housing market segmentation and sprawl | year / decade | urban |
Gentrification and sorting effects | year / decade | urban / local |
Public housing functionning and the 'right to buy' | decade | national / urban |
Job market and spatial mismatch | year / decade | national / urban |
Economies of agglomeration & production profile | year / decade | interurban |
1 book review every 2 months
cf. Cottineau et al., 2015 on a model of urbanisation in the post-Soviet space
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
Source: ONS, BSD
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
Source: ONS, BSD
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
Source: ONS, BSD
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
Source: ONS, BSD
cf. Cottineau & Arcaute 2019
Source: ONS, BSD
Multiscale measure
Possibility to integrate time
Possibility to link mechanism scale to cluster delineation
Identification of discontinuities
Linkage between scales, from individual to national
Adaptable to individual and zonal data depending on availability
Using Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings
From 20,000 to 46,000 people surveyed in Greater London each year
Located at postcode level
Indication of gross pay & hours worked
+ social occupation, age, sex, etc.
Economic similarity defined as
Creation of pay distribution per small areas based on London deciles
Source: ONS, ASHE 2009
Parr, J. B. (2007). Spatial definitions of the city: four perspectives. Urban Studies, 44(2), 381-392.
Rosen, K. T., & Resnick, M. (1980). The size distribution of cities: an examination of the Pareto law and primacy. Journal of urban economics, 8(2), 165-186.
Soo, K. T. (2005). Zipf's Law for cities: a cross-country investigation. Regional science and urban Economics, 35(3), 239-263.
Cottineau, C. (2017). MetaZipf. A dynamic meta-analysis of city size distributions. PloS one, 12(8), e0183919.
Arcaute, E., Hatna, E., Ferguson, P., Youn, H., Johansson, A., & Batty, M. (2015). Constructing cities, deconstructing scaling laws. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 12(102), 20140745.
Cottineau, C., Finance, O., Hatna, E., Arcaute, E., & Batty, M. (2018). Defining urban clusters to detect agglomeration economies. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 2399808318755146.
Cottineau, C., Hatna, E., Arcaute, E., & Batty, M. (2017). Diverse cities or the systematic paradox of urban scaling laws. Computers, environment and urban systems, 63, 80-94.
Briant, A., Combes, P. P., & Lafourcade, M. (2010). Dots to boxes: Do the size and shape of spatial units jeopardize economic geography estimations?. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(3), 287-302.
Meijers, E. J., & Burger, M. J. (2017). Stretching the concept of ‘borrowed size’. Urban Studies, 54(1), 269-291.
Cottineau, C., & Vanhoof, M. (2019). Mobile phone indicators and their relation to the socioeconomic organisation of cities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(1), 19.
Petrović, A., Manley, D., & van Ham, M. (2019). Freedom from the Tyranny of Neighbourhood: Rethinking Socio-Spatial Context Effects, Progress in Human Geography, 1-21
Cottineau, C., Reuillon, R., Chapron, P., Rey-Coyrehourcq, S., & Pumain, D. (2015). A modular modelling framework for hypotheses testing in the simulation of urbanisation. Systems, 3(4), 348-377.
Piketty, T. (2018). Capital in the 21st century. In Inequality in the 21st Century (pp. 43-48). Routledge.
Alacevich, M., & Soci, A. (2017). Inequality: A Short History. Brookings Institution Press.
Jaquet, C. (2014). Les transclasses, ou la non-reproduction. France (Presses universitaires de).
Sampson, R. J. (2012). Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. University of Chicago Press.
George, P. (1981). Géographie des inégalités. FeniXX.
Raimbault, J., Cottineau, C., Texier, M. L., Néchet, F. L., & Reuillon, R. (2018). Space Matters: extending sensitivity analysis to initial spatial conditions in geosimulation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.06008.
Spielman, S., & Harrison, P. (2014). The Co‐evolution of Residential Segregation and the Built Environment at the Turn of the 20th Century: AS chelling Model. Transactions in GIS, 18(1), 25-45.
Cottineau C., Arcaute E., (to be published), "The nested structure of urban business clusters", Applied Network Science. Available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.05106
Get in touch if you're interested.
email | clementine.cottineau@ens.fr
twitter | @ClementineCttn
gitHub | github.com/ClementineCttn
blog | unequalread.hypotheses.org
slides | slides.com/clementinecottineau/geographical-scales-of-economic-inequality
Seminar at
28th October 2019
This work contains statistical data from ONS which is Crown Copyright. The use of the ONS statistical data in this work does not imply the endorsement of the ONS in relation to the interpretation or analysis of the statistical data. This work uses research datasets which may not exactly reproduce National Statistics aggregates.