Rhetorical Canons:
Rhetorical Appeals:
Rhetoric impacts: Message, Audience, Speaker
Analysis: Break into parts/how it works
Evaluate: Effective/ineffective
Propaganda:
Referring back to Week 5's content on Rhetoric.
How can we see rhetoric used to persuade or manipulate the public based on these different themes? Are these legitimate issues in how rhetoric works (in text, online sites, music, video, company messages)?
What is Name, Image, Likeness really about in sports?
Think about how what you know about rhetorical situations, appeals, and Duffy's ideas in a topic for your Showdown Analysis. Using the past slides, consider what category or where your TWO artifacts will fall under or come from:
It would be helpful to create a WORD DOC, where you list or "information dump" all of your major talking points about the TWO artifacts. and then connect to our readings and concepts of rhetoric.
Have you had experience/discussion lately with friends, roommates, family about an issue presented with news media or on social media? What stands out connected to rhetoric, persuasion, and analysis?
What's in the Title?
- Are the titles too long?
- Are there weird ALL CAPS? Weird words?
- Are they sensational claims?
- More verb phrases?
What's in the Content?
- Fewer technical words, fewer analytical words?
-Smaller words?
-Fewer Quotes?
-Less information or substance? More focus on claims?
How are they trying to Persuade?
- Are they using sources, studies, reasoned arguments or relying on theories, shortcuts, and reactions?
Wilson, James and Daugherty, Paul. (2018). Collaborative Intelligence: Humans and A.I. are joining forces. Harvard Business Review
(Wilson & Daugherty, 2018, p.10)
(Claude AI, 2025)