Building cell-type-specific atlases

Daniel Fürth
Meletis Lab

Network for Networks
22nd May 2015

daniel.furth@ki.se

  • Ourania Tzortzi
  • Yang Xuan
  • Konstantinos Meletis
  • Johanna Stergiadou
  • Rickard Sandberg
  • Athanasia Palasantza
  • Iakovos Lazardis

    DMC lab

Acknowledgement

understanding behavior

striatal models

Graybiel, A. et al. (1990) PNAS 

cfos

cocaine

saline

striatal models

Graybiel, A. et al. (1990) 
Jordan, M. I. et. al. (1991). Adaptive mixtures of local experts.

striatal models

Schultz (1997)

Joshua, Adler, Mitelman, Vaadia, and Bergman (2008) 

Pennartz, Ito, Verschure, Battaglia, and Robbins (2011)

striatal models

Ken-ichi Amemori1,2Leif G. Gibb1,2 and Ann M. Graybiel1,2* (2011)

Pollak et al. 2014

www.mcstan.org

Whole-Brain Reconstruction

Pollak Dorocic et al. 2014

Reconstructing brain from sectioned tissue

Tracing the network

Tracing the network

Tracing the network

DRD2 film
56,710 neurons

Tracing the network

161,294 neurons film time

Tracing the network

Tracing the network

Tracing the network

Some problems with Allen's atlas

'Google maps' of neuroanatomy

'Google maps' of neuroanatomy

'Google maps' of neuroanatomy

similar to...

works with...

Cocaine induced locomotoric activity

Saline

Cocaine

Cocaine induced locomotoric activity

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Basic idea:

 

A

B

C

Independent
variable

Dependent
variable

Mediator
variable

Mediational statistical analysis

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Basic idea.

 

A

B

C

cocaine

dosage
(mg/ml)

Behavior
total track length (cm)

c-fos expression

(ith region)

direct effect

indirect effect

mediating effect

Question: How much of the behavioral variability is explained by variability in c-fos expression?

  • Regions of particular Interest
    • NAc
    • PFC
    • Dorsal striatum
    • Ventral pallidum
    • Amygdala
    • VTA
    • LH

Kourrich, Calu &  Bonci (2015)

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Some problems with unspecific binding.

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Flat-field

Dark image

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Some problems with unspecific binding

Whole-brain behavioral c-Fos mapping

Can be used to segment processes and their direction.

Functional

Can be used to segment processes and their direction.

scRNA-seq

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY | COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY | ANALYSIS

High-throughput spatial mapping of single-cell RNA-seq data to tissue of origin

Kaia Achim, Jean-Baptiste Pettit, Luis R Saraiva, Daria Gavriouchkina, Tomas Larsson, Detlev Arendt & John C Marioni

scRNA-seq

Allen Brain Reference Atlas

  • Atlas 2007 (manually drawn Nissl):
    • 200 μm thick coronal sections.
  • Atlas 2011:
    • 100 μm both coronal and sagital
  • Atlas 2014 (connectivity avrg template)
  • Atlas 2015 (beginning of june):
    • 10 x 50 μm
  • Registration atlas:
    • 25 x 25 μm
  • Grid expression ISH:
    • 200 x 200 μm MetaIOimage (.raw, .mhd)

 

scRNA-seq

Allen Brain Reference Atlas

scRNA-seq

scRNA-seq

Anatomic Gene Expression Atlas

Lydia Ng,  et al. (2009) Nat. Neuro.

http://mouse.brain-map.org/agea

scRNA-seq

324 cells from cortico-striatal section

scRNA-seq

Our approach

scRNA-seq

Our approach

scRNA-seq

Allen Brain Reference Atlas

  • Atlas 2007 (manually drawn Nissl):
    • 200 μm thick coronal sections.
  • Atlas 2011:
    • 100 μm both coronal and sagital
  • Atlas 2014 (connectivity avrg template)
  • Atlas 2015 (beginning of june):
    • 10 x 50 μm
  • Registration atlas:
    • 25 x 25 μm
  • Grid expression ISH:
    • 200 x 200 μm MetaIOimage (.raw, .mhd)

 

Connectivity average template (Ng et al. 2014)

scRNA-seq

Allen Brain Reference Atlas

  • Atlas 2007 (manually drawn Nissl):
    • 200 μm thick coronal sections.
  • Atlas 2011:
    • 100 μm both coronal and sagital
  • Atlas 2014 (connectivity avrg template)
  • Atlas 2015 (beginning of june):
    • 10 x 50 μm
  • Registration atlas:
    • 25 x 25 μm
  • Grid expression ISH:
    • 200 x 200 μm MetaIOimage (.raw, .mhd)

 

Connectivity average template (Ng et al. 2014)

CLARITY

Do we really have a 'BigData' problem in neuroscience?

http://www.parallac.org/

10 computers (146 processors)

Up to 64 cores per processor!

Freeman et al. (2014) Nature Methods

R package

  • Why R?
    • Standard data analysis:
      • load some data
      • estimate the density distribution.
      • plot it
xx <- faithful$eruptions
fit <- density(xx)
plot(fit)

R package

  • Why R?
#Line 1: loading
xx <- faithful$eruptions
#Line 2: estimate density
fit1 <- density(xx)
#Line 2: draw 10'000 bootstraps
fit2 <- replicate(10000, {
    x <- sample(xx,replace=TRUE);
    density(x, from=min(fit1$x), to=max(fit1$x))$y
})
#Line 3: compute 95% error "bars"
fit3 <- apply(fit2, 1, quantile,c(0.025,0.975))
#Line 4: plot the estimate
plot(fit1, ylim=range(fit3))
#Line 5: add estimation error as shaded region
polygon(c(fit1$x,rev(fit1$x)), c(fit3[1,], rev(fit3[2,])), col=’grey’, border=F)
#Line 6: add the line again since the polygon overshadows it.
lines(fit1)

What other language can do this in 6 lines of code?

Parallel computing

  • Parallel computing is extremely simple to implement from R. 

 

# install.packages('foreach'); install.packages('doSNOW')
library(foreach)
library(doSNOW)
cl <- makeCluster(2, type = "SOCK")
registerDoSNOW(cl)

getDoParName()


#matrix operators
x <- foreach(i=1:8, .combine='rbind', .packages='wholebrain' ) %:%
   foreach(j=1:2, .combine='c', .packages='wholebrain' ) %dopar% {
     l <- runif(1, i, 100)
     i + j + l  
   }

Concurrency and parallel programming

  • Multi threaded applications through             .
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>

using namespace std;

//The functions we want to make the thread run.
void task1(string msg)
{
    cout << "task1 says: " << msg;
}

void task2(string msg)
{
    cout << "task1 says: " << msg;
}

//Main loop.
int main()
{
    thread t1(task1, "Task 1 executed");
    thread t2(task2, "Task 1 executed");
    t1.join();
    t2.join();
}

Rcpp

Concurrency and parallel programming

  • Multi-threaded applications through             .
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
#include <thread>

using namespace std;

//The functions we want to make the thread run.
void task1(string msg)
{
    cout << "task1 says: " << msg;
}

void task2(string msg)
{
    cout << "task1 says: " << msg;
}

//Main loop.
int main()
{
    thread t1(task1, "Task 1 executed");
    thread t2(task2, "Task 1 executed");
    //let main wait for t1 and t2 to finish.
    t1.join();
    t2.join();
}

Rcpp

Dual core

Thank you!

scRNA-seq

Gene specificity

about ~24'000 genes expressed in the brain. 

\text{Let us define the following variables.}
Let us define the following variables.
c : \text{a unique single cell.} \quad \text{Where: } c \in \{1, ... , C\}, \text{ and } C = 380.
c:a unique single cell.Where: c{1,...,C}, and C=380.
m : \text{a unique single gene.} \quad \text{Where: } m \in \{1, ... , M\}, \text{ and } C = 380.
m:a unique single gene.Where: m{1,...,M}, and C=380.
D : \text{a } C \times D \text{ read count matrix.}
D:a C×D read count matrix.
D_{c,m} : \text{ normalized number of reads mapped to cell } c \text{ for gene } m.
Dc,m: normalized number of reads mapped to cell c for gene m.
r_{c,m} : \text{ cell-gene specificity ratio.}
rc,m: cell-gene specificity ratio.
r_{c,m} = \frac{D_{c,m}}{ s_m }
rc,m=smDc,m
s_{m} = \frac{1}{C} \sum_{i=1}^C D_{i,m}
sm=C1i=1CDi,m
s_{m} : \text{ gene specificity.}
sm: gene specificity.
Made with Slides.com