A Zodical man's challenge to Tatlin's materialism
Plus: the irredeemable uselessness of art....
Artist uses form to make harmony. engineer - uses form for construction. artist reproduces nature and delights in it, engineer wages in continual battle with it. Malevich. Non-Objective World
Art has once again met the figurative world of motors and machines, the world of technology, which it must destroy as it did the figurative world of academic arts, and only then will come the true form of the new world. Malevich, 1921
Some definitions from wikipedia:
Constructivism was an artistic and architectural philosophy that originated in Russia beginning in 1913 by Vladimir Tatlin. This was a rejection of the idea of autonomous art. He wanted 'to construct' art. The movement was in favour of art as a practice for social purposes. Constructivism had a great effect on modern art movements of the 20th century, influencing major trends such as the Bauhaus and De Stijl movements. Its influence was pervasive, with major effects upon architecture, graphic design, industrial design, theatre, film, dance, fashion and to some extent music.
Some definitions from wikipedia:
Materialism is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature, and that all phenomena, including mental phenomena and consciousness, are results of material interactions.
— Friedrich Engels, Socialism: Scientific and Utopian:
The materialist conception of history starts from the proposition that the production of the means to support human life and, next to production, the exchange of things produced, is the basis of all social structure; that in every society that has appeared in history, the manner in which wealth is distributed and society divided into classes or orders is dependent upon what is produced, how it is produced, and how the products are exchanged. From this point of view, the final causes of all social changes and political revolutions are to be sought, not in men's brains, not in men's better insights into eternal truth and justice, but in changes in the modes of production and exchange. They are to be sought, not in the philosophy, but in the economics of each particular epoch.
My presentation is guided by two question, which I want to pose now and return to:
1. Revolution as a cycle versus revolution as evolution: when a materialist philosophy spreads to territories beyond the machine to the physical body and nature, celestial body, etc, are there challenges to Soviet materialist notion of progressive time that emerge?
2. To which extent is Constructivism - as implementations of functional, efficient principles to cultural production, inherently flawed by the resistance of art to utility? An artist will always be a bad engineer, no?
Failures of Constructivism:
Lodder: historical circumstance
Wood: betrayal of revolution by regime
Groys: not failure! avant-garde totalitarianism culminates in Stalinism
definition: the study of the mechanical laws relating to the movement or structure of living organisms.
Exercises with Sticks
Throwing a Stone
Count to 5 silently. Start Over sans from body memory