Slides posted at slides.com/dhimmel/lehigh
http://www.greenelab.com/
Join us on Thursday, October 26, 2017 at 4:10 PM in Sinclair Lab Auditorium for an Open Access Week panel discussion, “Sci-Hub the Disruptor: Piracy and Publishing in Academia.”
Sci-Hub, the infamous online repository of pirated scholarly journal articles, has alternately been hailed as a paragon of open scientific communication and a criminal threat to beleaguered academic publishers.
The Friends of Lehigh University Libraries will host a panel discussion on how Sci-Hub has disrupted the age of open access, featuring Daniel Himmelstein, PhD, whose research found that nearly 70% of all scholarly articles in existence can be found in Sci-Hub's database.
Lehigh faculty members Jeremy Littau, Sera Cremonini, and Kathy Olson will comment on authors’ needs for open access and Sci-Hub’s rogue legal status, with comments from Lehigh’s Frank Pazzaglia on the Geological Society of America’s long road to open access - the legal way.
The Lehigh Libraries join institutions worldwide to celebrate International Open Access Week, which seeks to raise awareness of, and encourage participation in, open access advocacy, working towards the goal of making openness the new default in scholarship and research.
This event is free and open to the public. Light refreshments will be served.
Sponsored by the Friends of the Lehigh University Libraries
Sci-Hub is available at:
🔒
The New York Times:
Should All Research Papers Be Free?
Alexandra Elbakyan
https://doi.org/bf37
Idiogramma elbakyanae
Catalog of 87,542,370 DOIs
Study at https://doi.org/b9s5
Source code at https://github.com/greenelab/scihub
49% of 2.8 million articles
85% of 54 million articles
Source: Association of Research Libraries. Expenditure Trends in ARL Libraries, 1986–2015
What library will continue to subscribe if a growing proportion of articles is available for free elsewhere?
—Tom Reller (2013) Vice President, Elsevier
Defendants’ actions also threaten imminent irreparable harm to Elsevier because it appears that the Library Genesis Project repository may be approaching (or will eventually approach) a level of “completeness” where it can serve as a functionally equivalent, although patently illegal, replacement for ScienceDirect.
—DeMarco, Hirschberg & Sen (2015) Attorneys for Elsevier
Headlines:
https://doi.org/b9s5