Duality of Firms and Individuals

in Corporate Networks

Diliara Valeeva

KU Leuven

University of Amsterdam

Mitchell Center for Network Analysis | University of Manchester | 18 Nov 2020

Board interlock

Takes, F.W. & Heemskerk, E.M. Soc. Netw. Anal. Min. (2016) 6: 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0402-5

“Interlocks occur between organizations,

but they are created by individuals”

(Mizruchi 1996: 277)

1-mode

2-mode

2

FIRMS

A

B

2

INDIVIDUALS

X

Y

FIRMS

INDIVIDUALS

A

B

Y

X

How do board interlock ties form?

Valeeva, D., Heemskerk, E. M., & Takes, F. W. (2020). The duality of firms and directors in board interlock networks:

A relational event modeling approach. Social Networks, 62, 68-79.

Open access: https://bit.ly/2HeF9s6

Broken ties argument

A

B

FIRMS

fast tie reconstruction

slow tie reconstruction

firms matter more

individuals matter more

"Duality of persons and groups"

 

Breiger (1974)

1-mode

2-mode

2

FIRMS

A

B

2

INDIVIDUALS

X

Y

FIRMS

INDIVIDUALS

A

B

Y

X

Strategies to form ties

(1) reinforcement

(2) expansion

X

X

Y

Z

X

Y

Z

Problem

reinforcement

expansion

one-mode FIRMS

one-mode INDIVIDUALS

two-mode

FIRMS and INDIVIDUALS

Data and Methods

  • Denmark
  • 1994-2014
  • 3,304 firms
  • 10,377 individuals
  • 14,893 board appointments
  • Relational Event Modeling

Hypotheses

Predictors of new ties

  • Popularity of directors
  • Six-cycles
  • Danish and male directors
  • Banks and financial firms

Conclusions

  • Complementary rather than conflicting interests of firms and individuals
  • Duality of agents is typical for social systems and should not be ignored

Other projects

Diliara Valeeva

@diliara_valeeva

dlliara.valeeva.com

CORPNET

@uvaCORPNET

corpnet.uva.nl

Made with Slides.com