and myths about them
Diliara Valeeva
Guest lecture at the 'Human Geography' course
7 December 2021
1. Why study elites?
2. Key definitions
3. Corporate elites
4. Key findings
5. Conclusions
*Classical elite theorists: V. Pareto, R. Michels, G. Mosca
masses
elites
Elites are “those who have vastly disproportionate control over or
access to a resource” (Khan, 2012: 362).
* elites occupy power positions
* a resource must have transferable value
Shareholders
Board of directors
Officers: CEO, CFO etc
Management
2. Firms owned by dynasties are internationalizing
3. Nation-states no longer matter for elites
1. Elites are moving from being national to being global
200 million firms and their board members
Mostly quantitative data analysis
Descriptive analysis
Statistics and network analysis
Elites are moving from being national to being global
Uber (US)
Walmart (US)
Nestle (CH)
Alibaba (CN)
Wang Ling Martello
Kraft Foods (US)
Borden Foods (US)
NCH Marketing (US)
Stellantis (NL)
Warner Music (US)
Netflix (US)
Gruner + Jahr (DE)
Axel Springer (DE)
Vodafone (UK)
Mathias Döpfner
KPMG (BE)
KBC bank (BE)
Cera (BE)
Erik Clinck
Farming for Climate (BE)
Boost for Talent (BE)
Thomas More (BE)
<10%
1. Elites remain attached to their country of origin
Firms owned by dynasties
are internationalizing
Al Nahyan family on board of
First Abu Dhabi bank
Rotschild family
Faber-Castell family
1. Elites remain attached to their country of origin
2. The role of national dynasties has not diminished
Nation-states no longer matter for elites
Super yacht and private jet mobilities (Knight Frank Wealth Report, 2020)
1. Elites remain attached to their country of origin
2. The role of national dynasties has not diminished
3. Elites are concentrated within regions
2. Firms owned by dynasties are internationalizing
3. Nation-states no longer matter for elites
1. Elites are moving from being national to being global
@diliara_valeeva
This presentation online: slides.com/diliaravaleeva/elites
www.diliaravaleeva.com