Mean score, by course type
Outcome 1: Rhetorical Composition.
Students compose texts in multiple genres, using multiple modes with attention to rhetorical situations.
Mean score, by course type
Outcome 2: Critical Thinking and Reading Resulting in Writing.
As they undertake scholarly inquiry and produce their own arguments, students summarize, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the ideas of others.
Mean score, by course type
Outcome 3: Writing as Process.
Students understand and practice writing as a process, recursively implementing strategies of research, drafting, revision, editing, and reflection.
High/Low scores, by outcome
Outcome 1: Rhetorical Composition.
Students compose texts in multiple genres, using multiple modes with attention to rhetorical situations.
High/Low scores, by outcome
Outcome 2: Critical Thinking and Reading Resulting in Writing.
As they undertake scholarly inquiry and produce their own arguments, students summarize, analyze, synthesize, and evaluate the ideas of others.
High/Low scores, by outcome
Outcome 3: Writing as Process.
Students understand and practice writing as a process, recursively implementing strategies of research, drafting, revision, editing, and reflection.
Kappa (k) quantifies the amount of agreement between measurements that is greater than the amount expected by chance alone. If kappa = 0, chance agreement. If kappa < 0, less than chance agreement (rare). If kappa = 1, perfect agreement.
Range of scores |
Non adjudicated weighted kappa |
High |
.46 to .69 |
Medium |
.23 to .45 |
Low |
.1 to .22 |
2015-16
2016-17