**Montréal - October, 2017**

E. Noether, interpreted by @hannelita

TOO MANY QUESTIONS!!11

- What are ideals?
- What are rings?
- Who is E. Noether?
- Can we apply this weir mathematics to programming?
- Who are you?

- Computer Engineer
- Programming
- Electronics
- Math <3 <3
- Physics
- Lego
- Meetups
- Animals
- Coffee
- Pokémon
- GIFs

- Tons of theory
- Mostly about Abstract Algebra...
- ... And many ppl are not familiar with this area
- I'll explain all the components we will need
- We'll see how to apply these concepts in programming
- TL;DR we will see some concepts that are not in the paper
- We won't cover 100% of the 51 pages of E. Noether's paper :')
- We will try to keep it simple, without much formalism from Mathematics [sorry!]
- GIFs will help us

**Intro to Abstract Algebra**- Developing Abstract Algebra
- E. Noether
- The paper
- Applications
- Back to the paper
- References

1. A set with an operation (any operation). Let's assume +.

2. This operation (+) is associative

3. For every element of this set (let's say **a**), there's a special element such that

a + specialElement = a

$a + specialElement = a$

(this special element is called identity element)

4. For element a in the set, there will be an inverse of **a**, denoted by

a^{-1}

$a^{-1}$

Formal notation: <G, +>

"Groups are abundant in nature" (PINTER, Charles).

Ex: the set of integers with respect to addition

Formal notation: <ℤ, +>

Ex: the set of integers with respect to multiplication

Formal notation: <ℤ, *>

Let's talk about *

The set of integers with respect to multiplication

Commutative property for the multiplication

a*b = b*a

$a*b = b*a$

It does not always happen!

If it does, we call the group a commutative group or **abelian group**

If it does, we call the group a commutative group or **abelian group**

If it does, we call the group a commutative group or **abelian group**

If there is a subset **S** of a group **G** such that:

- The product of every element of **S** is in **S** (closed with respect to multiplication)

- **S** is closed with respect to inverses

Or

- **S** is closed with respect to addition

- **S** is closed with respect to negatives

**S** is a subgroup of **G**

**S** is itself a Group!

Imagine a group of... Functions

Group of all functions ℝ -> ℝ

Group of all continuous functions ℝ -> ℝ

A

B

a

b

c

x

y

z

A

B

a

b

c

x

y

z

f =

a b c

x y z

(

)

Bijective Function

f: A -> B

Domain

Image

Bijective Function

No remaining elements in the image

Only one arrow from one element in A to one in element in B

One-to-One function

Bijective functions have inverses

Important if we want to represent them as groups!

Bijective Function

No remaining elements in the image

Only one arrow from one element in A to one in element in B

One-to-One function

Bijective functions have inverses

Important if we want to represent them as groups!

Imagine a group of... a bijective function f: A->A

It rearranges the elements of A

Permutations of A

Examples: Set of the symmetries of a Square is a permutation group

Imagine a group of... a bijective function f: A->A

It rearranges the elements of A

Permutations of A

Examples: Set of the symmetries of a Square is a permutation group

a

b

d

c

a b c d

Imagine a group of... a bijective function f: A->A

It rearranges the elements of A

Permutations of A

Examples: Set of the symmetries of a Square is a permutation group

a

b

d

c

a b c d

Imagine a group of... a bijective function f: A->A

It rearranges the elements of A

Permutations of A

Examples: Set of the symmetries of a Square is a permutation group

d

a

c

b

a b c d

d a b c

Imagine a group of... a bijective function f: A->A

It rearranges the elements of A

Permutations of A

Examples: Set of the symmetries of a Square is a permutation group

a

b

d

c

a b c d

a d c b

Permutations are interesting

Permutations are interesting

f =

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 1 6 9 8 2 4 5 7

(

)

Permutations are interesting

f =

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 1 6 9 8 2 4 5 7

(

)

f =

1

3

6

2

Permutations are interesting

f =

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 1 6 9 8 2 4 5 7

(

)

f =

1

3

6

2

9

7

4

Permutations are interesting

f =

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 1 6 9 8 2 4 5 7

(

)

f =

1

3

6

2

9

7

4

8

5

Permutations are interesting

f =

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

3 1 6 9 8 2 4 5 7

(

)

f =

1

3

6

2

9

7

4

8

5

**Cycles**

Two groups can be isomorphic!

There is a one-to-one correspondence which transforms one into another.

A1

A2

A3

A1, A2 and A3 are classes of a **Partition of A**

Two classes must be disjoint

The Union of these classes is the set A

If two classes are not disjoint, they are equal

A1

A2

A3

A1 ~ Ax

Ax

Ay

Az

A2 ~ Ay

A3 ~ Az

Equivalence Relation

We can have different partitions of the same set

- **S** is closed with respect to addition

- **S** is closed with respect to negatives

Zero is not part of the odd numbers 😱

The odd numbers are the even numbers shifted by one

odd = 2ℤ + 1

This is what we call...

We have a group G and a subgroup H. For any element **a** in G,

**aH** denotes the set of all the products a*h; **a** remains fixed and **h** ranged all over H

For the previous example, we have H = <2ℤ,+>

Question: is aH == Ha ?

(Can we measure 'how commutative' a group is?)

hint:

x*a*x^{-1}

$x*a*x^{-1}$

(conjugate of **a**)

**f** is a Homomorphism from **H** to **G**

Example:

**f** is a Homomorphism from **H** to **G**

Example:

+ | e | o |
---|---|---|

e | e | o |

o | o | e |

Parity group P

P is a homomorphic image of ℤ

P keeps one aspect of ℤ (odd of even)

Yes!

There's a particular type of subgroup, that

is closed with respect to products, inverses and conjugates

We call it **normal subgroup of G **(let's call it H)

The set that consists of all the cosets of H (let's call it **G/H**) is a homomorphic image of G.

We've been talking about groups for a while. It's time for a new character:

Similar to a group, but with two operations

Usually, the two operations are addition and multiplication

Every ring is a group

Properties of rings:

- a ring A with addition alone is an abelian group

- multiplication is associative

- multiplication is distributive over addition

Definition: Given the rings A and B, **B absorbs products in A** if we multiply an element i B by an element in A and the result is in B.

When a ring B is part of a larger ring A, B is a subring of A if B is closed with respect to addition, multiplication and negatives.

When multiplication is also commutative, we call it

A **commutative ring**

A ring does not necessarily have an identity element for multiplication

If there's one, we call it unity of A

And this is what we need to know to meet the next character:

(I'm sure we will survive to the formal definition)

A commutative ring,

with unity,

in which every nonzero element is invertible

Q, ℝ, C are examples of fields

Definition: A nonzero element is called divisor of zero if there's an element **b** in the ring such that the product a*b or b*a is equal to zero

Is ℤ a field?

a*a^{-1}=1

$a*a^{-1}=1$

Not really.

Property: A nonzero element a has an inverse such that

Definition: When there are no divisors of zero,

This is what we call cancellation property

a*b = a*c

$a*b = a*c$

So please give a warm welcome to...

b=c

$b=c$

=>

**Integral domain**

Commutative ring,

with unity,

having the cancellation property

And now, **finally**, the missing character:

A nonempty subset B of a ring A

and B absorbs products in A

B is closed with respect to addition and negatives

Ideals are like normal subgroups for rings

Normal subgroup: is closed with respect to products, inverses and conjugates

Do you remember why we defined the normal subgroups?

Because of the quotients. And guess what, if we had group quotients, then we have:

Quotient rings!

Ideals play an important role in abstract algebra; we can understand many properties of groups and fields just by analysing the ideals.

Abstraction is an important skill for programming

We saw many concepts in this talk

Concepts about... abstractions and generalisations

Who came up with these concepts?

1880 - 1930: E. Steinitz, David Hilbert, R. Dedekind, E. Artin, L. Kronecker, E. Kummer,

**Emmy Noether**

Erlangen, Germany - 1907 she completes her studies in Mathematics

In 1915, D. Hilbert and F. Klein invite Noether to Göttingen

She did many works using Hilbert's name - women were not allowed to teach in some areas

She obtained a permission to teach in 1919 and stayed in Göttingen until 1933

"Ideal Theory in Rings" came in 1921

We already saw some definitions during the previous slides :)

It's mainly about ideals and rings

There are 12 sections. Let's go through them

Note: some definitions in the paper became obsolete

Keep alive: this will be a bit abstract (pun intended)

Definition of commutative ring,

integral domain,

and quotients

Ideals are always denoted by capital letters

Theorem of finite chain - infinite set of ideals, in which each ideal is divisible for the following one

Least common multiple of a ideals B1, B2,...,B2 is itself an ideal

Decomposing an ideal

There are reducible ideals (can be expressed as the least common multiple of proper divisors) and irreducible ideals

The equality between ideals relies on the properties of reducibility

If the components of an ideal are collected into groups and if we obtain the least common multiple, then the resulting representation is reduced.

And then we can compare the ideals

Q is a proper ideal of a commutative ring A if

x*y is an element of Q

x or n^y are also elements of Q

Something interesting happens when the ring A contains all the multiples of a prime (and Q will be a prime ideal):

Prime ideals are also primary ideals

Primary ideals are irreducible

A prime ideal is irreducible

We can think of an ideal **B** containing primary ideals (It's a loop!)

But B itself won't be a primary ideal

Two ideals I, J of a commutative ring R

are relatively prime (or coprime)

if A+B=R

Every ideal can be uniquely expressed as the least common multiple of finitely many mutually relatively prime and relatively prime irreducible ideals

Where can I apply that? -.-

We can identify pieces of our code as elements of abstract algebra

Very simple example:

class BankAccount

withdraw and deposit

Are withdraw and deposit commutative?

balance = 500.00; withdraws 600.00; deposits 1000.00;

We can identify pieces of our code as elements of abstract algebra

Very simple example:

class BankAccount

withdraw and deposit

Are withdraw and deposit commutative?

balance = 500.00; withdraws 600.00; deposits 1000.00;

The balance will be negative for a moment

We can identify pieces of our code as elements of abstract algebra

Very simple example:

class BankAccount

withdraw and deposit

Are withdraw and deposit commutative?

balance = 500.00; deposits 1000.00; withdraws 600.00;

We can also do a better refactor if we apply the concepts of abstract algebra

Imagine that you have similar functions, accepting different parameters but performing similar operations

Maybe we can generalize the function

(we can interpret this as a group or ring)

The properties of ideals are a good example of elements of abstract algebra that help us with abstractions in programming

"From Mathematics to Generic Programming"; A. STEPANOV and D. ROSE

Free slides of the classes

E. Noether makes a distinction between relatively primes and coprimes, but nowadays we treat both as similar structures

Every ideal can be uniquely expressed as the product of finitely many pairwise coprime ans coprime irreducible ideals

Let's meet another character:

A Ring and a Set walk into a bar

Each of them has a pair of operations

One of the operations takes an element of the ring and an element of the module and returns an element of the module

The underlying set of the module and its operation form a group

(page 37)

We can interpret polynomials within rings

Do you remember your school time? 'Polynomial factorisation', 'Irreducible polynomial fractions'

Ch. 10 shows some properties of polynomials rings

In programming, we could interpret a chain of actions/method calls as a polynomial

And use the ideas of abstract algebra

Applying abstract algebra in other areas of mathematics

You have a set of batteries, and you know their voltage (example: 9V, 12V, 24V)

You don't have any instrument to measure the voltage in a certain time

You want to obtain a certain voltage in one of the batteries and you are allowed to transfer the charges from one to another

9V

12V

One of the batteries must end up with 6V. What should we do?

Initial state - both discharged (B1: 0V; B2: 0V)

B1

B2

Fully charge B1 (B1: 9V; B2: 0V)

Transfer the charge of B1 to B2 (B1: 0V; B2: 9V)

Fully charge B1 (B1: 9V; B2: 9V)

Transfer the charge of B1 to B2 (B1: **6V**; B2: 12V)

```
trait Transfer {
def change(state: State): State
}
case class Empty(battery: Int) extends Transfer {
def change(state: State) = state updated (battery, 0)
}
case class FullCharge(battery: Int) extends Transfer {
def change(state: State) = state updated (battery, voltages(battery))
}
case class Charge(from: Int, to: Int) extends Transfer {
def change(state: State) = {
val charge = state(from) min (voltages(to) - state(to))
state updated (from, state(from) - charge)
updated (to, state(to) + charge)
}
}
```

```
val transfers =
( for ( b <- batteries ) yield Empty(b)) ++
(for (b <- batteries) yield FullCharge(b)) ++
(for (from <- batteries; to <- batteries if from != to)
yield Charge(from, to))
```

Operation: charge

Identity element: 0

Inverse: Discharge

```
val transfers =
( for ( b <- batteries ) yield Empty(b)) ++
(for (b <- batteries) yield FullCharge(b)) ++
(for (from <- batteries; to <- batteries if from != to)
yield Charge(from, to))
```

B1: n*3V

B2: n*3V

The final answer is Vector

We can multiply an add the elements of this vector

Computational Complexity, Cryptography, Graph Theory, Computational Group Theory

I hope this presentation helped you to understand some concepts of Abstract Algebra

Also, I hope you all know one of the works of a great mathematician of the 19th century, Emmy Noether

And I hope you have enjoyed the GIFs!

There's a connection between this area and programming - and we have much work to do

Charles Pinter; "A book of Abstract Algebra"

A. Stepanov and D. Rose; "From Mathematics to Generic Programming"

Lectures from KTH institute

Interesting threads from MathExchange

Questions?

hannelita@gmail.com

@hannelita