Frédéric Clavert / frederic.clavert@uni.lu / @inactinique
Let's ask the question antoher way.
Lieux de mémoire as the result of collective practices.
But is the database the result of a social process
linked to collective memory?
Is it an artifact / trace of collective memory ?
Inspired by Noiret, Serge, «Histoire et mémoire dans la toile d'histoire contemporaine italienne» in Rygiel Philippe et Noiret Serge, Les historiens, leurs revues et Internet : France, Espagne, Italie, Publibook, Paris, 2005.
1. Url-Uri
2. Title of the database (Website)
3. Publication date
4. Last update date
5. Authors
6. Institutional publisher
7. Access
8. Analytics
1. Object of the database
2. Context of the database
3. Format of the objects contained in the database
4. Is there a historiographical / memorial context?
1. Object of the website that host the database
2. Ends of the website
3. Content of the website
1. Metaphor / Nature of the design
2. Organisation of the interface of the database /
of the website?
3. Navigation
4. Communication language
5. Links to other websites / content on other websites
1. The role of the user
2. Collaboration with users and its nature
3. Links to social media
The underlying question is linked to battelfields.
Underlying question: links between memories of the Great War and memories of the WW2 / statutes of each belligerent during those two wars