activating the protocol fee comes at a cost
Alex @lajarre | π§ Butter
EBS 2023-11-07
π§
π§
π§
Model:
π§
Price impact:
π§
See Angeris et al: "An analysis of Uniswap markets", 2019
Utility:
π§
π§ allocate more towards AMM with larger reserves
π§
π§ marginal allocation
towards AMM
with larger volume
π§
π§
fork + subsidy = liquidity flight
π§
Simple model:
π§
Intuition:
π§
π§ at equilibrium, subsidy makes LP allocation indifferent
π§ equilibrium +Ξ΅ counteracts network effects: liquidity flight
π§
β οΈ reallocation will be lower because of switching costs
(brand, smart contract risk, legalβ¦)
V = 10^8 USD
R = 10^7 USD
R_1(0) = 100%
π§
π§
Intuition:
π§
π§
π§ avoid equity-like funding: capture via wealth condensation
π§ if governance surface:
Debt(GovernanceFutureRevenue)
β‘οΈ parameter auctions
β‘οΈ proposal auctions
β‘οΈ auctions & futarchy
π§ crowdfunding: LPs and swappers will fund if more efficient (coasean argument)
see https://ethresear.ch/t/governance-mixing-auctions-and-futarchy/10772
π§
π§
what does this prove about governance?
π§
π§ XV is the present value extracted by UNI tokenholders out of the protocol
π§ XV is limited by the attack:
π§
π§ forking & smart contracts influence governance
π§ grim trigger on UNI tokenholders
π§
twitter.com/butterymoney
twitter.com/lajarre
π§