continuation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qwk_epMblW4
All those solid, soft or non-voting ones
Every message received by voters and the campaign environment (e.g. media, competitors)
The substantive message is nice, but not always effective
you have to play on emotions
Humphrey 1968
This TV ad was produced in 1968 at the request of Hubert Humphrey's campaign team. It was aimed at Spyro Agnew, who was running for vice president alongside R. Nixon, and whose qualifications were considered very low. The ad shows a TV screen with the text: "Spyro Agnew for president?". At the same time, a loud, mocking laugh can be heard from off-screen. The ad ends with the narrator's commentary and the text on the screen: "This would be funny if it weren't true."
"Dziewczynka pokoju" (Peace, little girl) 1964
The film went down in history as "Daisy". It was created by Tony Shwartz, hired by the campaign team of the presidential candidate - Lyndon Johnson. The advertisement was intended to convince voters that Johnson's rival - Democrat Barry Goldwater was a dangerous radical who had repeatedly praised nuclear weapons. In the film, a little girl holds a daisy in her hand and clumsily counts the petals as she plucks them. The camera zooms in on the girl's eye, and in the background you can hear the countdown before the explosion.
"Dziewczynka pokoju" (Peace, little girl) 1964
An atomic bomb explodes on the screen. During the explosion, you can hear Johnson's voice: "The choice is clear: make sure that all of God's children in the world can live or go into darkness. We must love one another, or we must die."
The advertisement ended with the words of the narrator: "Vote for President Johnson on November 3rd. The stakes are too high to stay home." The film was released only once - on September 7, 1964, on the Monday Night Election program on the national station CBS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Id_r6pNsus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1k17HAaj5mg
https://x.com/Platforma_org/status/1790991407076773961
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OU9OKCMJRrA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tANW8D6imK0
30:48
A compromise between:
a different situation for a candidate (individualization), a different one for a committee/list, and very exceptional in the case of local elections.
A broader approach than to the TOPICS of the campaign (we choose those, what we want to deal with) - in the program we refer to everything that may turn out to be important.
An important answer to the question: what topics (sum) may appear in the election campaign?
What about internal contradiction? It is acceptable, but then we expose ourselves to attacks from competitors. Most voters will not notice it anyway (they will not even have a chance)
Voters do not distinguish the competences of individual bodies or even individual authorities. This can be exploited, but it also has negative sides - voters may expect solutions to problems that are beyond their control.
you can use available public opinion polls
as well as the results of sociological research, all analyses, censuses
using media information to identify problems of a given community
if we run a campaign in Łódź or Kraków, we are not interested in fishing problems!
But the problems of the shipyard - as a symbol - can be a bit more
Especially in local elections - it is worth considering conducting a survey in the district regarding the problems and expectations of residents. This has not only informational value, but allows you to promote the candidate (you have to take an active part in this!)
Opinions of your closest environment - important, but you have to take into account the representativeness.
Several levels depending on the type of election and the committee formula.
The easiest way in a SMC to the Commune Council is from your own committee, which puts up only 1 candidate.
The most twisted in local government elections in the case of a national committee (how to avoid conflicts between the interests of different regions, provinces, and even communes? - see planning the route of expressways)
If the program is to take some physical form (print, or even place it on a website), it is not worth creating contradictory versions for different segments of the electorate - the risk of embarrassment is too high.
NOTHING IN NATURE IS GOING TO BE WASTE, AND EVEN MORE SO IN THE POLITICAL MARKET!!!
Election campaign plan
Every campaign (regardless of the level) is divided into stages
The question is, does such a division make sense in practice?
Election campaign plan
Each campaign (regardless of the level) is divided into stages
Building a political brand: continuous, but stronger in relation to the group. Only in the pre-election stage are candidates launched (known and identified people and new, unknown people).
Stage of building lists and searching for funds
Organizational and financial problem of pre-campaign activities
The campaign lasts NON-STOP
Election campaign plan
It is important to prepare a list of tasks.
Divided into the most important (e.g., failure to complete which results in elimination from the election process), important and optional.
Tasks should be defined in time and specific people should be assigned to them.
The calendar should be agreed between the candidate and the staff.
In the case of many candidates - a problem of coordination arises
Resources allocated to the campaign
Resources of various types - organizational, financial
First, you need to determine (estimate) the resources to which we have access (can be launched), then those to which we expect to have access (e.g. volunteers, "who will come"), and only then, against this background, you need to determine the resources needed to conduct the campaign.
It is useful to have information about the resources of the other candidates, especially opponents, who have them.
The assessment of resources must be made for a specific case!
po odpowiednich spotkaniach (w razie potrzeby kilkukrotnych) może pojawić się pytanie o konkretne wsparcie. W wypadku wolontariuszy - dużo wcześniej, tym bardziej, że w dużej mierze to oni będą się do nas zgłaszać (niekoniecznie wyłącznie z potrzeby serca i aktywności społecznej).
z zasady nie odmawiamy pomocy, ale są od tego wyjątki - szczególnie w sytuacji, gdy współpraca z jakąś osobą (lub organizacją) może spowodować straty wizerunkowe. W wypadku wolontariuszy, których nie chcemy angażować - można zastosować metodę wygaszenia kontaktu.
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
1. Readability
2. Attractiveness
3. Practicality
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
1. Readability
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
1. Readability
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
1. Legibility
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
2. Attractiveness
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
2. Attractiveness
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
3. Practicality
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
3. Practicality
Three basic conditions that election materials should meet:
3. Practicality
Poorly prepared or ill-considered material can - instead of promoting us - harm us. Leaflets prepared especially for drivers of cars parked in Łódź housing estates (retkinia):
Poorly prepared or ill-considered material can - instead of promoting us - harm us. Leaflets prepared especially for drivers of cars parked in Łódź housing estates (retkinia):
What information should appear in each material?
Candidate's surname (prominent, first name less)
The party from which the candidate is running
District number/number on the list
List number...?
Website address (currently it can be a FB page, but it is better to have a separate one), at least one profile on a social networking site (more is better, but updated!), possibly a messenger.
Albo YouTube etc.
What information may appear on the materials
Different signature limits (from a dozen to 100,000)
Important distinction between districts
The Electoral Commission provides a number of exemptions from the obligation to present signatures, but it is not worth using them
Regardless of the limit - it is better to collect as many signatures as possible
approx. 30% should be considered invalid in advance
(we do not hand out lighters at the lung disease clinic)
Regardless of the preparation of the campaign, the resources (including financial ones), the organization's banner or the candidate's name, one cannot forget about several laws of the structure of the universe
Regardless of our assumptions, we will NEVER be able to implement the campaign plan 100%
and EVEN IF we do, we will never be in a situation where nothing more could be done
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we still won't have access to such funds that we couldn't do it better
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we will somehow have access to such funds that it wouldn't be possible to do it better, we still won't use them due to limits
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we'll somehow have access to such funds that it couldn't be done better and somehow we won't be bound by limits, we'll never have the best candidate
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we will somehow have access to such funds that it couldn't be done better and somehow we won't be bound by limits and we will have the best candidate, we won't be able to predict all the actions of the competition and opponents
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we will somehow have access to such funds that it couldn't be done better and somehow we won't be bound by limits and we will have the best candidate and we will anticipate all the actions of the competition and opponents, we won't eliminate them and their voters
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, somehow we will have access to such funds that it couldn't be done better and somehow we won't be bound by limits and we will have the best candidate and we will anticipate all the actions of the competition and opponents and even eliminate them and their voters, we won't convince everyone
and EVEN IF we manage to implement the plan and we couldn't do more, we will somehow have access to such funds that it couldn't be done better and somehow we won't be bound by limits and we will have the best candidate and we will anticipate all the actions of the competition and opponents and we will even eliminate them and their voters and convince all the voters...
[if only because of the actual ineligibility of some candidates]