Andrew Janco (Haverford College)
and Philip Gleissner (Ohio State)
Use Prozhito data to explore a concrete research problem in the field of literary history, namely the reception of thick journals.
Illuminate the process of capturing and operationalizing data.
Walk through the steps of an exploratory analysis of the data as networks and make first observations about the way Soviet readers perceived literary magazines.
Learn the basics of social network analysis, using the online tool Palladio.
www.soviet-journals.org
Six Moscow-Based Journals between 1960 and 1964
Journals shared varying numbers of authors: social landscape of the field of literary production and similarities and differences between journals
Over time, ties between journals in terms of shared authors grow weaker.
Question: Does this matter to readers? Are we indeed watching a competitive market of cultural production AND consumption?
Proposal: Trace literary reception in the diaries in the Prozhito archive. Which journals do diarists read and mention at the same time?
go.osu.edu/slavic_dh
go.osu.edu/slavic_dh
Learn to use Cytoscape with Miriam Posner's tutorial...
Some of our preliminary observations are consistent with the fragmentation of literary production discussed in the beginning.
Versatility of the journal Znamia.
Mutual exclusivity of...
Outsider position of...
Next Steps:
Return to qualitative analysis: journals referenced in a negative or positive way, in-depth or peripherally?
Make sure the data is complete and weed out data that doesn’t fit, e.g. diaries of literary authors.