Problem Description

RL + Meta-Learning for Manipulation

Meta-Learning

Learning to learn (meta-learning) is a skill that enable humans to generalize and transfer prior knowledge.

 

Goal: Quickly retrain a trained model to learn a new task from few samples

 

Meta-Learning enables:

• Sample efficiency
• Leverage prior experience
• Generalization

Problem Description

Reinforcement Learning

Learning useful policies by directly interacting with the environment and receiving rewards for good behaviors

Advantages:

• No need for labeled data
• Generalizable
• Very few priors needed

Disadvantages:

• Real-world experience is expensive
• Slow and unstable convergence

Problem Description

Robotic Manipulation

Robotic Manipulation refers to the use of robots to effect physical changes to the world around us. Examples include moving objects, grasping, carrying, pushing, dropping, throwing, and so on.

Challenges:

• Expensive to gather data
• Difficult to simulate contact dynamics and accurate physics
• Learned policies brittle to environmental changes, generalization
• Supervised learning difficult due to nature of the problem

Problem Description

Meta Learning + RL + Manipulation

• RL offers a robust, scalable approach to learning novel manipulation tasks

• Meta Learning addresses the sample inefficiency and expensive data collection issues by allowing for effective learning of the shared structure between tasks 

Problem Description

Current Approaches to Meta Learning

Broad categorization of Meta-Learning approaches:

• Metric Based
• Model Based
• Optimization Based
  • MAML
  • Reptile

 

Problem Description

Task

Benchmarking Meta-Learning Approaches

Manipulation Task: Reach

• Learning the reach manipulation task 
• Task benchmark suggested by Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learning
• Meta-Learning 1 (ML1): Few-shot adaptation to goal variation within one task
• Represents parametric task variation
• Train tasks: 10 reach goals
• Test tasks: 5 reach goals

Fig: Train and Test tasks showing parametric task variation

Fig: Parametric vs Non-Parametric Task Variation

RLBench: Simulator

• Benchmark and learning-environment for robot learning
• Built on top of Coppelia-Sim
• Goal: Reach the red target from a fixed starting position

Fig: 7 DOF Arm performing reach-task in RL-Bench Simulation

Dataset

Policy Network

Inputs: EE Pose, Goal Pose

Outputs: Delta EE pose

EE Pose

Goal Pose

Delta EE Pose

Approach/Methods

Learning the Reach-Task

PPO

• Policy gradient RL Algorithm

• Improvements over other PG methods

• Still sample inefficient (200K+)

Reptile

• Policy gradient RL Algorithm

• Improvements over other PG methods

• Still sample inefficient (200K+)

MAML

• Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning

• General optimization algo, compatible with any model that uses SGD

• Learns good policy parameter initializations

Multi-headed Reptile

• Investigate a proposed batch version of the algorithm empirically
• Evaluates on n tasks at each iteration and updates the initialization by the following rule

Batch update rule

initialization parameters

updated parameters

on the i-th task

Multi-headed Reptile

• Batch updates are lower variance, and have potential to lead to faster convergence.

• This is similar to performing mini-batch GD vs SGD

 

Multi-headed Reptile:

Asynchronous updates

• Implemented this asynchronously
• Same wall-clock time as the serial version
• More stable updates (in theory) without additional time

}

N parallel workers

Results & Discussion

Results -  Success Rate

80% success rate

Reptile

MAML

Multi-Headed Reptile

Vanilla PPO

Multi-headed reptile doesn't work

• In multi-headed reptile, we directly changing the parameters based on the updated parameters of task-specific models

• Effectively we only account for first order gradient terms and entirely lose information of higher order terms.

• Batch gradient descent and batch parameter weight update have different convergence properties

Results - Training Times

• Training time for multi-headed reptile comparable to the reptile

Conclusions

RL + Meta-Learning for Manipulation

Conclusions

• Confirmed and benchmarked two meta-learning algorithms for manipulation:   

  • MAML > Reptile > PPO ~ Multi-headed Reptile

• In this work we explored Multi-headed Reptile, which has the following two changes

  • ​Batch updates of parameters : Does not provide the performance boost due to loss of higher order terms

  • Asynchronous training : This speeds up the training process

• ​Further investigation needed into the probable causes of its failure and potential fixes

Thank You