Image: Alres Almelda. CC BY 2.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/
Local communities and everyday life in Funen
Ryan Weber
Ilpo Tammi
Svendborg
4.4.2016
Hvor er det værd at bo
Mapping service reachability in 4 Nordic city-regions
In-depth analysis conducted for Funen:
Sector | Component | Service |
---|---|---|
Culinary | Restaurants | Restaurants |
Cafes and bars | ||
Groceries | Grocery stores | |
Convenience stores | ||
Culture & leisure | Fitness | Fitness centers / gyms |
Swimming halls |
||
Arts | Cinemas and theaters | |
Libraries | ||
Health | Hospitals | Hospitals |
Clinics and pharmacies | Clinics | |
Pharmacies | ||
Education | Pre-school | Daycares and kindergarterns |
Schools | Primary | |
Secondary | ||
Tertiary | ||
Commerce | Banking | Banks and ATMs |
Postal services | Post offices or kiosks |
All urban areas over 1000 inhabitants
Maximum Attainable Service Uses (MASU)
Per Inhabitant Service Accessibility (PISA)
Urban area clusters
CRITERIA USED IN CLUSTERING
Demographic:
Socio-economic:
Service / accessibility:
+ Demographics
+ Socioeconomics
+ Services
+ Demographics
+ Socioeconomics
- Services
+ Demographics
- Socioeconomics
+ Services
- Demographics
+ Socioeconomics
+ Services
+ Demographics
- Socioeconomics
- Services
- Demographics
+ Socioeconomics
- Services
- Demographics
- Socioeconomics
+ Services
- Demographics
- Socioeconomics
- Services
1 (strongest)
Index
0 (weakest)
1 (strongest)
Index
0 (weakest)
Blomstrende bysamfund
Pendlerbyer i vækst
Godt byliv - men attraktivt?
Atrraktive byer med usikker fremtid
Velhavende - men uden byliv
Servicebyer i lavere gear
Voksende byer med problemer
Byer med udfordringer
Thriving local communities
The prospering commuting countryside
Central places, but attractive for living?
Decent services, but what about the long-term?
Wealthy settlements with few services
Facing decline, but with some urban potential
Challenged, but growing
Challenged areas
Examples from Tampere regional planning for 2040