Image: Alres Almelda. CC BY 2.0 - creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/

Local communities and everyday life in Funen

Ryan Weber

Ilpo Tammi

Svendborg

4.4.2016

Hvor er det værd at bo

Presentation overview

 

  1. Background and Approach
  2. Service and public transport accessibility in Nordic city-regions
  3. Linking accessibility to socio-economics and demographics
  4. The big picture on Funen
  5. Turning information into practice
  6. Remarks about future perspectives

Background and Approach

Mapping service reachability in 4 Nordic city-regions

  • Analytical focus on :
    • functioning of the urban form - the effortlessness of everyday life and access to amenities
    • a functional "city-regional" scale
    • testing a comparable spatial analysis in multiple cities
    • providing information that can support policy and planning

In-depth analysis conducted for Funen:

  • Linking accessibility to socio-economics and demographics

Background and Approach

  • 2400 points of common  "everyday services" mapped on Fyn
  • Detailed timetable and location data of public transport stops
Sector Component Service
Culinary Restaurants Restaurants
Cafes and bars
Groceries Grocery stores
Convenience stores
Culture & leisure Fitness Fitness centers / gyms
Swimming halls
Arts Cinemas and theaters
Libraries
Health Hospitals Hospitals
Clinics and pharmacies Clinics
Pharmacies
Education Pre-school Daycares and kindergarterns
Schools Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Commerce Banking Banks and ATMs
Postal services Post offices or kiosks

Background and Approach

Service accessibility in Nordic city-regions

Service accessibility in Nordic city-regions

Public transport accessibility in Nordic city-regions

Public transport accessibility in Nordic city-regions

Linking accessibility to socio- economics & demography

Linking accessibility to socio- economics & demography

Linking accessibility to socio- economics & demography

The big picture in Funen

All urban areas over 1000 inhabitants

Maximum Attainable Service Uses (MASU)

Per Inhabitant Service Accessibility (PISA)

Urban area clusters

CRITERIA USED IN CLUSTERING

Demographic:

  • Household size
  • Population change and growth
  • Age structure
  • Age dependency
  • Child dependency

 

Socio-economic:

  • Mean household income
  • Household income change
  • Employment rate
  • Unemployment rate
  • Higher education rate

 

Service / accessibility:

  • Mean reachable service types
  • Public transport frequency
  • Population density
  • Mean reachable services (intensity)

+ Demographics

+ Socioeconomics

+ Services

+ Demographics

+ Socioeconomics

-  Services

+ Demographics

-  Socioeconomics

+ Services

-  Demographics

+ Socioeconomics

+ Services

+ Demographics

-  Socioeconomics

-  Services

-  Demographics

+ Socioeconomics

-  Services

-  Demographics

-  Socioeconomics

+ Services

-  Demographics

-  Socioeconomics

-  Services

1 (strongest)

 

 

 

 

Index

 

 

 

 

0 (weakest)

1 (strongest)

 

 

 

 

Index

 

 

 

 

0 (weakest)

Blomstrende bysamfund

Pendlerbyer i vækst

Godt byliv - men attraktivt?

Atrraktive byer med usikker fremtid

Velhavende - men uden byliv

Servicebyer i lavere gear

Voksende byer med problemer

Byer med udfordringer

Thriving local communities

The prospering commuting countryside

Central places, but attractive for living? 

Decent services, but what about the long-term? 

Wealthy settlements with few services

Facing decline, but with some urban potential

Challenged, but growing

Challenged areas 

Turning information into practice

Examples from Tampere regional planning for 2040

Future perspectives

  1. Generational shifts in what is attractive living? What might this mean for long-term strategy?
  2. Comprehensive understandings of mobility
  3. Combining the everyday life perspective with business and commerce development
  4. What are the specific planning needs in your municipal perspectives? 
  5. How can this type of information be useful for you in your work?

Upcoming work

  1. Publication of Nordic Working Group Results
  2. Meeting with Nordiska skärgårdssamarbetet
  3. Two follow-up projects in Denmark:
    • Danish-German cross-border region
    • Business Region Aarhus
Made with Slides.com