Tiziana Mancinelli
VeDPH
@tizmancinelli
Text
We are great at creating digital content but lousy at managing it
Aaron D. Purcell (2019)
Le Digital humanities hanno costruito progetti scientifici e materiali digitali nati nel corso degli anni.
Dove sono questi progetti?
Christof Schöch’s “Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities” http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/2-3/big-smart-clean-messy-data-in-the-humanities/
Hermeneutical practices are described as “Digital hermeneutics” when digital sources and computational methods are involved in the epistemological process. ( Daquino, Pasqual, Tomasi)
Debates about method are ultimately debates about our models. (Julia Flanders, 2018)
DH
But... What are data in Humanities?
The methodologies we use are mostly a byproduct of our praxis. In other words: we make do with what we have. This situation is partly a result of what can be termed as the inheritance model of digital humanities inquiry.
The inheritance model means that the tools of digital humanists used in the early stages of the field (and partly to this day) have mostly been created for purposes very different than the study of the past. There are, of course, exceptions to the tools ‘inherited’ from other disciplines.
This situation has led to the creation of a mixed methodology, which tries to use tools not necessarily made to perform a particular task. (Mateusz Fafinski, 2021)
Data structures that correspond to our intuitions about the intellectual organization of the data
Modelling is a creative process to gain new knowledge about material and immaterial objects by generating representations of them. It is widely understood and used as a heuristic strategy in the sciences (Frigg and Hartmann 2012, Mahr 2009) as well as in digital humanities (DH) research where it is considered a core practice (McCarty 2005, 20–72).
data elements whose level of abstraction and granularity matches that of our domain analysis, and an overall architecture in which making the information connections required for analysis is simple and direct rather than requiring elaborate or extremely indirect traversals.
For digital humanities data, a standard has been defined as “codified rules and guidelines for the creation, description and management of digital resources” (Gill and Miller, 2002). Standards can be classified as a de jure standard, which may be mandated by law (or may be used to designate a formal standard), or de facto standards, such as the Text Encoding Initiative, which enjoys widespread use and acceptance.
Standard de-facto:
“one no longer preserves tangible physical objects per se, but views abstract representations of such objects that can be reconstructed in an unpredictable technological future.”
J.P. Chanod, Will Your Data Still Be Around Tomorrow?, 2013, http://bit.ly/2tMRP3c)
The costs of digital scholarship are frequently posed in terms of human labor and rights abuses, ecological and environmental damage, carbon footprints, waste of resources associated with obsolescence, and other issues that affect every stage of
the lifecycle of production.
But sustainability also needs to be understood as an epistemic concept embedded in complex systems, not merely as a set of problems to be solved through instrumental means applied to operational logistics.
DH scholars need to imagine ways of mitigating the impact of inequalities on project development, communication, training, collaboration and engagement.
Bibliographic References
Elena Pierazzo, How subjective is your model? in Shape of data in Digital Humanities ed. Julia Flanders and Fotis Jannidis, London, Imprint Routledge, 2018
Circling around texts and language: towards “pragmatic modelling” in Digital Humanities - http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/3/000258/000258.html
Images credits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data#/media/File:Data_types_-_en.svg
https://www.ibs.it/two-cultures-scientific-revolution-libro-inglese-c-p-snow/e/9781684115334
https://www.katinamichael.com/seminars/2020/7/30/progressing-from-humanities-to-digital-humanities