Constitution Day 2022
Jerod Tufte
Justice, North Dakota Supreme Court
A law. Our fundamental law.
Ask: What did the lawmakers mean when they chose to express the law in these words?
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened), against domestic Violence.
art. IV, § 4
if two thirds of both Houses propose Amendments to this Constitution they become part of the Constitution when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the States
art. V
A Constitution that is hard to amend is difficult for slim majorities to use to wield power over minority interest groups
"What a court is to do, therefore, is to declare the law as written, leaving it to the people themselves to make such changes as new circumstances may require.
The meaning of the constitution is fixed when it is adopted, and it is not different at any subsequent time when a court has occasion to pass upon it."
Const. Lim. at 67-68 (5th ed. 1883)
What does the Court say it is doing?
What is the Court in fact doing?
What should the Court be doing?
Living Constitutionalism
Purposivism
Common Law Constitutionalism
Pragmatism
Eclecticism
Amd. XIV (1868)
References
Jerod Tufte, The North Dakota Constitution, an Original Approach Since 1889, 95 N.D. L. Rev. 417.
Sources and materials available at ndconst.org
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health (2022)
The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision, including the one on which the defenders of Roe and Casey now chiefly rely—the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. That provision has been held to guarantee some rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U. S. 702, 721 (1997).
NDSU Policy 154
3.7. No speech, expression, or assembly may be conducted in a way that disrupts or interferes with any teaching, research, administration, or other authorized activities on the campus. Nor may such speech, expression, or assembly be conducted in a way that interferes with the rights of others to free speech and free expression. Due to the contextual nature of disruptive conduct, NDSU is reliant on the judgment and fairness of University employees and authorities in determining what constitutes disruptive conduct. Such judgment must be content neutral and focused on the disruptive nature of the conduct and not the message of the disruption. Disruptive conduct is prohibited.