Research Ethics
- an introduction
TAMOS, 2013
Karim Jebari
Division of Philosophy, KTH
Outline of this lecture
- Scientific honesty and scientific misconduct
- The use of humans in research
- The scientist’s responsibility for the consequences of research
The Tuskegee Study
The Vipeholm Study
The Jan Hendrik Schön case
Ethical vs. legal obligations
Ethical scientific practice?
- Management of data
- Sharing of data
- Authorship
-
Plagiarism
Scientific miscunduct
”fabrication,
falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research,
or in reporting research results”
Fabrication of data
Falsification of data
why is this important?
- Reliability & quality
- Replication
- Accountability
- Intellectual propoerty
How can this happen?
Trust is important
-
Publish or perish
-
Complexity
-
Remoteness
Openness
-
Advancement of knowledge
-
Critizism and feedback
-
Build trust
-
Public acceptance
Discuss 1
The Gillberg case
when can openness be wrong?
-
Intellectual property
-
National security?
-
Confidential information?
Authorship
Discussion 2
Who is an "author"?
Contribtion
+
Approval
What is plagiarism?
To claim credit for other's work.
Discussion 3
Self- plagiarism?
"10- 30 % rule"
Check KTH:s tutorial!
Break!
(15 min)
The use of humans in research
The Nuremburg Code (1949)
Basic ethical principles
-
Respect for persons
-
Beneficence
-
Justice
Respect for persons
Autonomy and privacy
Informed consent
-
Provision of information
-
Voluntary participation
-
Decision-making capacity
Access to information?
-
complete
-
comprehensible
Not so simple...
- What does understanding mean?
-
Can information always be given?
who is a "volunteer"?
-
Option to decline
- No coercion
More trouble...
Geoengineering?
WHO IS CAPABEL TO DECIDE?
What can we do?
We need to know how kids react to medicine.
Discussion 4
The mIlgram experiment
Is this ok?
-
No informed consent
-
Harmed subjects
-
Validity?
Social RESPONSIBILITIES
- Knowledge can be dangerous
- Neccessary for public support
-
A duty of beneficience?
Bioterror
who is right?
A: We need to know!
B: Knowledge is dangerous.
Summary
-
Why research ethics?
-
Scientific misconduct
-
Human experiments
-
Social responsibility
Thank You!
Karim Jebari
jebarikarim@gmail.com
politiskfilosofi.com
twitter.com/karimjebari
Research Ethics
By Karim Jebari
Research Ethics
- 3,444