💭

😃

😍

🤗

👎

💪

😟

 💭

👍

😝

🎉

 💭

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

👍

LGTM

LGTM

LGTM

LGTM

LGTM

🚨

🔥

🚨

🔥

🔥

🚨

🚨

🚨

👩🏽‍🚒

🙈

oh no.

we really got this code review thing down!

we really got this code review thing down!

 💭

There must be a better way of doing code reviews!

...Right?

catching problems at the “lowest-value” stage

“quality gates”

🤔

👀

🔄

🔥

collective ownership in construction

inspections

defect-detection

not correction

short reviews

walk throughs

working meetings

Who is doing the review?

How much time are they spending on it?

What exactly are they saying or doing while reviewing?

And how?

🤷🏽‍♀️

💁🏽

1.  commit hooks

2. PR templates

3. screenshots/gifs

4. linters

5. encapsulation

6. specific reviewers

1.  review everyone: push for a culture that values vulnerability

2. develop empathy: call out the good stuff, too!

it👏er👏ate👏

3. 

iterate

iterate