Hacking Law & Antifragility
of anonymous cryptocurrencies

Who is

Pavol Travnik?

ex-Lawyer

Law hacker

IT Developer

 

voluntaryist

cryptoanarchist

Some work

Bitcoin definition in CZ/SK

 

DDR,

Perpetual travelling (residency),

Web of trust, Reputation systems

 

Arbitration protocol iusdice.org

 

and ...

 

DISCLAIMER

This is highly theoretical topic and I do not recommend to anyone to participate on such activity as described in this presentation.

Part I.

PHILPSOPHY

Justice

There is a.s. probability, that state creates

a positive law which is against a natural law.

(f.e. against private property).

 

 

massive taxation & bureaucracy

regulation

war on drugs

illegality of anonymous cryptocurrencies (math)

etc.

Secession

In that case people have right to create self organised parallel structures which are in ongoing conflict with a state and separate from the influence of the state (secession).

 

 

Individual municipalities shall be entitled to secede from the union. The decision on whether to initiate a secession procedure shall be made by a majority of the Liechtenstein citizens eligible to vote who reside there. ~ Constitution of the Principality of Liechtenstein

Freedom

Freedom is not a given freely and it is not a default state.

State scale

politics, war for independence

 

Individual level

have a business, tax optimisation, risk calculation, wealth protection, security protection, moving to a different country, reputation system, web of trust,

use of cryptography in comunication,

use of cryptocurrency, operate in second realm

Myth of the rule of law

  • your mind is the greatest enemy
  • not neutral and objective/impersonal
  • instead of logic based on emotions
  • arbitrary
  • indeterminate
  • logically inconsistent
  • allows contradictory two options at the same time
  • vague language
  • court can simply ignore logic and previous case law

 

 

 

Read Myth of the rule of law by John Hasnas

Myth of the rule of law

"The observation that the legal system is highly stable is, of course, correct, but it is a mistake to believe that this is because the law is determinate. The stability of the law derives not from any feature of the law itself, but from the overwhelming uniformity of ideological background among those empowered to make legal decisions. Consider who the judges are in this country. Typically, they are people from a solid middle- to upper-class background who performed well at an appropriately prestigious undergraduate institution; demonstrated the ability to engage in the type of analytical reasoning that is measured by the standardized Law School Admissions Test; passed through the crucible of law school, complete with its methodological and political indoctrination; and went on to high-profile careers as attorneys, probably with a prestigious Wall Street-style law firm."

Solution

  1. Avoid disputes on a state court, always use Alternative Dispute Resolution if possible, such as an arbitration or a mediation.
  2. Avoid confrontation and interaction with a state, use law hacks instead otherwise you will end up in bureaucratic loop.
  3. Never sue state through state court, statistically it is waste of money.
  4. Use crypto insurance instead and community support. It is not there? Create it!
  5. Schelling point for justice consensus.

Part II.

HACKING LAW

Perpetual Traveller

Pavol Luptak

CRYPTO LIBERATION STORY OF ONE PERPETUAL TRAVELER: HOW TO ACHIEVE BOTH ECONOMIC AND PERSONAL FREEDOM USING GLOBALITY AND FLEXIBILITY

 

Avoid useless obligations!

Civil obligations are dead, long live the blockchain

  • more than 10 % of population in CZ are not paying debts
  • numbers are growing - debt relief is not solution
  • dispute with bank for 4 years - tired parties, paralysed courts
  • I do not own physical property (minimalism)
  • cryptocurrency is not possible to get in CE
  • state never had control over cryptocurrencies
  • proxy merchants (people obeying blockchain)
  • ! criminal law !

Part III.

THE PARADOX

Trust in set

1st realm

2nd realm

Trust in set

1st realm

2nd realm

Trust in set

1st realm

2nd realm

Trust in set

1st realm

2nd realm

Hacking a law...

Question: How to obtain an "illegal" content from another person and yet to be sure that person is not an state officer trying to convict me from a crime?

Goal could be: create safe parallel market structures

68 %

Mafia rituals

Proof of crime

NAP, victimless crime

digital content, XOR, signature

 

rendered child pornography

propagation of criminal act of another person

Jim Bell's assassinations markets or lotteries

 

If anonymous cryptocurrency become illegal, then it is a perfect proof of crime.

Agent provocateur

Agent provocateur is French for "inciting agent" and refers to a person used by law enforcement officials to bait another into committing a crime. An agent provocateur may be a police officer or a secret agent of police tries to gather evidence against another.

Agent provocateur

Teixeira de Castro v. Portugal

CASE OF LÜDI v. SWITZERLAND

EUROFINACOM v. FRANCE DECISION

RAMANAUSKAS v. LITHUANIA

 

5 Tdo 1196/2017

Agent provocateur

USA -  Entrapment--A Legal Limitation on Police
Techniques by John B. Williams

"undercover agent’s reports showed clearly that, even without the agent’s intervention, Mr Lüdi had had the intention of acting as an intermediary in the supply of large quantities of narcotics"

"The public interest cannot justify the use of evidence obtained as a result of police incitement."

Agent provocateur

He was suspected of petty drug-trafficking in order to pay for drugs – mainly hashish – for his own consumption. They hoped that through V.S. they would be able to identify his supplier and offered to buy several kilograms of hashish from him. Unaware that they were police officers, V.S. agreed to find a supplier. However, despite being pressed by the two officers, he was unable to locate one.

Agent provocateur

Shortly before midnight on 30 December 1992 the two officers went to V.S.’s home saying that they were now interested in buying heroin. V.S. mentioned the name of Francisco Texeira de Castro as being someone who might be able to find some; however, he did not know the latter’s address and had to obtain it from F.O. All four then went to the applicant’s home in the purported buyers’ car. The applicant came outside at F.O.’s request and got into the car where the two officers, accompanied by V.S., were waiting.

Agent provocateur

In the light of all these considerations, the Court concludes that the two police officers’ actions went beyond those of undercover agents because they instigated the offence and there is nothing to suggest that without their intervention it would have been committed. 

Antifragility

Contact

pavol.travnik@iusdice.org

keybase.io/travnik

medium.com/@pavol.travnik

BTC

LTC

Invite me for a coffee!

Hacking Law & Antifragility of anonymous cryptocurrencies

By pavoltravnik

Hacking Law & Antifragility of anonymous cryptocurrencies

  • 240