DISCLAIMER

New concept of decentralised reputation system

"Reputations will be of central importance, far more important in dealings than even the credit ratings of today. These developments will alter completely the nature of government regulation, the ability to tax and control economic interactions, the ability to keep information secret, and will even alter the nature of trust and reputation." ~ Timothy C. May, The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto

State

officer

  • anonymous
  • paid by taxes (first mixing service)
  • executing sometimes law, which is considered by basic human logic immoral

Business owner

  • known by public
  • transparent to government by accountancy

ONE-WAY TRANSPARENCY

Question

Is it moral discriminate tax officer, immoral policeman while making a contract with him?

Power asymmetry

Information asymmetry is highly criticised by collectivists.

 

Today's law system is dependent on anonymity of state officers, while business owners has to act publicly and transparent. This one-way transparency can brings a dominance of the current state organisation over the market. Non-equal position of two parties allows sanctions and other forms of punishments based on legal but sometimes not on moral basis.

Coase theorem

In law and economics, the Coase theorem describes the economic efficiency of an economic allocation or outcome in the presence of externalities. The theorem states that if trade in an externality is possible and there are sufficiently low transaction costs, bargaining will lead to a Pareto efficient outcome regardless of the initial allocation of property.

STATE

Increases

transaction

costs

MARKET

Decreases

transaction

costs

State evolves

Government is not static, it always changes.
We can not be sure, that some terroristic act brings our society to dictatorship tomorrow. And people have right to protect themselves against tyrants and dictators by creating parallel trust systems.

State evolves

Government is not static, it always changes.
We can not be sure, that some terroristic act brings our society to dictatorship tomorrow. And people have right to protect themselves against tyrants and dictators by creating parallel trust systems.

and creates own reputation systems!

State evolves

Government is not static, it always changes.
We can not be sure, that some terroristic act brings our society to dictatorship tomorrow. And people have right to protect themselves against tyrants and dictators by creating parallel trust systems.

and creates own reputation systems!

Social Credit System

in China

Index of Tax reliability

in Slovakia

Index daňovej a colnej spoľahlivosti prinesie odmeny pre firmy

Ministerstvo financií zavádza hodnotenie daňovníkov formou indexu daňovej a colnej spoľahlivosti, ktoré bude slúžiť výlučne na interné účely finančnej správy a bude neverejného charakteru. Aký index bude pridelený daňovníkovi, bude známe iba finančnej správe a daňovníkovi samotnému. Návrh zavedenia hodnotenia daňovníkov vyplýva z akčného plánu boja proti daňovým únikom. Pridelenie indexu by malo v praxi prebiehať na základe verejne známych kritérií. Aká váha však bude pridelená vybranému kritériu nebude známe.
„Podľa všetkého čakajú podnikateľov s najlepším hodnotením odmeny za riadne plnenie si daňových povinností. Pre spoľahlivých podnikateľov to môže znamenať napríklad uprednostnenie miestneho zisťovania pred daňovou kontrolou, nižšia periodicita daňových kontrol, predĺženie lehôt v prospech daňovníka či skoršie vrátenie nadmerného odpočtu DPH. To sú pre firmy rozhodne pozitívne správy,“  hodnotí Silvia Hallová.

Personal reasons

Slovenian government arrested me, because I refused to show my ID to Police at my home at 2 AM, without legal explanation. Therefore I got a fine 400 EUR, not because I broke a law, but because I refused to show my ID.

 

I sued a government, because they destroyed my passport without explanation. It is more than 3 years and the case was still not heard by court.

 

I was poisoned by food and end up in hospital during this Christmas (2017). I reported it to Sanitary station. My thoughts was, I will help other people not to be poisoned and I was wrong again. They replied after 2 weeks, that they are going to plan a control.

 

...

 

and many more.

 

EBAY

DARK MARET

DARK MARET

DARK MARET

Reputation systems today

+ easy to setup

+ best cost/benefit ratio

- centralised

- owned by third party

- unreliable

- cross platform reputation missing

PROOF OF EXISTENCE

Trying to solve Sybil attack

 

Keybase.io - Keys exchange

(Web of trust)

 

Proof-of-work

Proof-of-donation

Proof-of-burn

Proof-of-timelock

 

More on OpenBazaar

BLOCKCHAIN

AKA PAGE RANK

LINK RANK

ANONIMITY MATTERS

Blockchain analysis

Proof of tax evasion

Lost anonymity

REPUTATION PARADOX

ANONYMITY

TRANSPARENCY

REPUTATION PARADOX

(conclusion)

REPUTATION BASED ON HISTORY

vs.

REPUTATION BASED ON FUTURE

COMPETENCY LOOP

Who is competent to make final decision?

Czech republic court hierarchy

 

  1. European Court for Human Rights
  2. European Court of Justice
  3. Constitutional Court
  4. The Supreme Court of Justice | The Supreme Administrative Court
  5. Court of Appeal
  6. High Court of Justice
  7. County Court

Maxims of perfect

reputation system

  1. Participants are anonymous and identities are hidden. (mandatory)
  2. Transaction history is not relevant and it is a weak point.
  3. Bond has significant importance.
  4. Web of trust is major information about trustworthiness.
  5. Motivations of participants can be illogical (f.e. exit scams), therefore bonds and insurance companies are great improvement.
  6. Competency problem need to be solved. (PoW?)

Solving three problems

1. Verification of official documents

 

2. Transfer official documents to smart-contract readable format

 

3. Reputation and liability system, which can be self-executed

Verification of official documents

Actual Notary system

1. Visit a notary.

2. Made a signed statement, you got verified document sign in the Notary system.

 

Qualified electronic signature

Official data mail box issued by the Government

Just forward it into system

Smart-contract readable format

It is impossible right now to convert paper or PDF document to json format, which describes content of the document without trusted third party.

{	
	"language":["en","cs"],
	"name":"Pavol",
	"surname": "Travnik",
	"file":"diploma",
	"study_programme":"law",
	"creation_date":"2015–05–19",
	"shasum-265":"a2f09f38f20a0a38d1ddd5859f86027140a3eda05302dffff1108e7b8b8b4579"
}

TRUE or FALSE?

Smart-contract readable format

TRUE or FALSE?

T

F

T

F

T

T

T

1. round

2. round

3. round

Competency loop

How to find

the best consensus?

Who will finally

decide?

Who will control judge?

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

Even private property started as a concept in human minds. Proof of trust.

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

HODL

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

A 13 XMR

B 13 XMR

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

A 23 XMR

B 35 XMR

C 16 XMR

D 23 XMR

F 36 XMR

...

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

A 23 XMR

B 35 XMR

C 16 XMR

D 23 XMR

F 36 XMR

...

3 XMR

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

A 23 XMR

B 35 XMR

C 16 XMR

D 23 XMR

F 36 XMR

...

O 13 XMR

3 XMR

Whitelist

D

C

E

H

A

F

B

G

I

N

L

M

K

J

R

O

U

Q

T

S

V

P

W

10 XMR

3 XMR

2 XMR

20 XMR

10 XMR

0 XMR

10 XMR

B

1 XMR

A 23 XMR

B 35 XMR

C 16 XMR

D 23 XMR

F 36 XMR

...

O 0 XMR

0 XMR

"Za policejní provokaci se považuje aktivní činnost policie, která směřuje k podněcování určité osoby (fyzické či právnické) ke spáchání konkrétního trestného činu s cílem získat usvědčující důkazy a vyvolat její trestní stíhání, a jejímž důsledkem je vzbuzení úmyslu spáchat trestný čin podněcovanou osobou, ačkoliv předtím tato osoba žádný takový úmysl neměla. Policejní provokací je i taková aktivní činnost policie, jíž dochází k doplňování chybějících zákonných znaků základní skutkové podstaty určitého trestného činu, k záměrnému podstatnému navýšení rozsahu spáchaného činu podněcovanou osobou, či k jiným způsobem vyvolané změně právní kvalifikace spáchaného činu k tíži podněcované osoby, zejména pokud jde o okolnosti podmiňující použití vyšší trestní sazby, byť by jinak tato osoba byla k spáchání činu v obecném smyslu rozhodnuta. II. Pokud při provádění zkoušky spolehlivosti realizované podle § 41 zák. č. 341/2011 Sb., o Generální inspekci bezpečnostních sborů a o změně souvisejících zákonů, ve znění pozdějších předpisů, nedojde ze strany příslušníka inspekce či jiné osoby provádějící takovou zkoušku (§ 41 odst. 4 zák. č. 341/2011 Sb.) k nepřípustnému ovlivnění jednání zkoušené osoby způsobem zakládajícím policejní provokaci, pak jsou zkouška spolehlivosti provedená v souladu s § 41 zák. č. 341/2011 Sb. a důkazy v souvislosti s ní získané (zejména obrazový a zvukový záznam dokumentující průběh zkoušky spolehlivosti a inspekcí pořízený úřední záznam podle § 41 odst. 6 zák. č. 341/2011 Sb.) využitelné také v trestním řízení (§ 89 odst. 2 tr. ř.). III. Důkaz získaný na základě policejní provokace je absolutně neúčinný v trestním řízení vedeném proti vyprovokované osobě." Rozhodnutí NS ČR Tpjn 301/2014

http://nsoud.cz/Judikatura/judikatura_ns.nsf/WebSearch/6F3982C28358C263C1257D88002E91DB?openDocument

Agent provocateur

"Státní zaměstnanec se na základě usnesení o zahájení trestního stíhání pro úmyslný trestný čin nebo trestný čin proti pořádku ve věcech veřejných z nedbalosti zprostí výkonu služby až do skončení trestního stíhání." Podle § 48 zákona č. 234/2014 Sb. o státní službě

Irreproachable

PROOF OF CRIME

Basic gang and mafia rituals

PROOF OF CRIME

Verification two parties through XOR

 

Criminal act committed directly by transaction

  1. To broadcast transaction user must prove, that his device contains Simulated child pornography[1]
  2. By sending money to Jim Bell to develop assassination market
  3. Sending money directly on ...

Disclaimer !!!

This is highly theoretical concept for discussion not to real implementation. I do not and will not participate on such project.

CONCLUSION

I propose a system "Whitelist", where reputation is interconnected between pseudo-identities. Person use fraction of its property to ensure others, that they will not commit (...). It is possible, by networking effect, to create liability system based on shared interconnected liability based on real connections and trust. It involves "skin in the game" and decreases transaction costs for creating web of trust.

SOCIALIST UNITE

ANARCHISTS NETWORK

THANK YOU

pavol.travnik@gmail.com

keybase.io/travnik

medium.com/@pavol.travnik

https://github.com/pavoltravnik/whitelist

https://gitter.im/whitelist-reputation/Lobby

Whitelist - interpersonal liability network

By pavoltravnik

Whitelist - interpersonal liability network

  • 636