Kory Draughn

Chief Technologist

iRODS Consortium

November 12-17, 2023

Supercomputing 2023

Denver, CO

iRODS HTTP API:

Presenting iRODS as HTTP

Overview

  • What is the iRODS HTTP API?
  • Why is this necessary?
  • Design
  • Configuration
  • Connection Pooling
  • Parallel Writes
  • General Performance
  • Examples
  • Future Work

What is the iRODS HTTP API?

An experimental redesign of the iRODS C++ REST API.

 

Goals of the project ...

  • Present a cohesive representation of the iRODS API over the HTTP protocol, effectively simplifying development of client-side iRODS applications for new developers
  • Maintain performance close to the iCommands
  • Remove behavioral differences between client-side iRODS libraries by building new libraries on top of the HTTP API
    • C, C++, Java, Python, etc - all languages produce identical behavior and results
  • Absorbed by the iRODS server if adoption is significant

Why is this necessary?

The iRODS C++ REST API proves that presenting iRODS as HTTP is possible, however, usage of the project over time has uncovered some challenges.

 

Challenges ...

  • Too many open ports raise security concerns
  • Stability issues (e.g. crashing endpoints)
  • Separation of endpoints increases complexity due to multiple layers
    • e.g. Interns found it difficult to understand how things are composed
  • Pistache HTTP library lacks completeness/maturity/adoption
  • Names of existing endpoints are fairly general which leads to difficulty in naming of new endpoints

 

The iRODS HTTP API is aimed at resolving these issues by taking a different approach based on what we've learned from the community and the iRODS S3 API.

 

To view the original document which kick-started this effort, click here.

Design - Early Decisions

  • Single binary exposing one (or two) ports
  • Boost.Beast
    • A C++ header-only library providing networking facilities for building high performance libraries and applications which need support for HTTP/1 and Websockets
    • First used by the iRODS S3 API
  • Fixed set of URLs
    • Easy for users and developers to remember
  • Renamed from REST to HTTP
    • The rules of REST are not clear
    • The rules of REST do not map well to the iRODS API
    • iRODS is stateful
    • Focus on designing the best API we can

Design - API URLs

Named based on concepts and entities defined in iRODS.

Operations are specified via parameters. This decision keeps URLs simple (i.e. no nesting required) and allows new/existing developers to guess which URL exposes the behavior they are interested in.

 

For example, if you want to modify a user, look at /users-groups. Or, perhaps you need to write data to a data object, then you'd use /data-objects.

/authenticate /resources
/collections /rules
/data-objects /tickets
/info /users-groups
/query /zones

Design - API Parameters

All URLs, except /authenticate and /info, accept an op parameter.

  • Mapped to a function responsible for executing the requested operation
  • Shares common values where possible
    • e.g. stat, list, create, remove, etc

 

Common parameters used through out the API ...

  • lpath
  • replica-number
  • src-resource
  • dst-resource
  • offset
  • count

 

Parameter names are not final and may change in the future.

Configuration - Top Level

{
    // Defines HTTP options that affect how the
    // client-facing component of the server behaves.
    "http_server": {
        // ...
    },

    // Defines iRODS connection information.
    "irods_client": {
        // ...
    }
}

Defines two sections to help administrators understand the options and how they relate to each other.

 

Modeled after NFSRODS.

Configuration - http_server

"http_server": {
    "host": "0.0.0.0",
    "port": 9000,

    "log_level": "warn",

    "authentication": {
        "eviction_check_interval_in_seconds": 60,

        "basic": {
            "timeout_in_seconds": 3600
        },

        "oidc": { /* ... options ... */ }
    },

    "requests": {
        "threads": 3,
        "max_rbuffer_size_in_bytes": 8388608,
        "timeout_in_seconds": 30
    },

    "background_io": {
        "threads": 3
    }
}

Configuration - irods_client

"irods_client": {
    "host": "<string>",
    "port": 1247,
    "zone": "<string>",

    "proxy_admin_account": {
        "username": "<string>",
        "password": "<string>"
    },
 
    "tls": { /* ... options ... */ },

    "enable_4_2_compatibility": false,

    "connection_pool": {
        "size": 6,
        "refresh_when_resource_changes_detected": true
    },

    "max_number_of_bytes_per_read_operation": 8192,
    "buffer_size_in_bytes_for_write_operations": 8192,
    "max_number_of_rows_per_catalog_query": 15
}

Connection Pooling

iRODS clients connect and disconnect frequently.

 

This kills performance!

 

This issue resulted in the following enhancements for iRODS 4.3.1 ...

  • Proxy user support for irods::connection_pool and irods::client_connection
  • rc_check_auth_credentials
    • Allows native authentication credentials to be verified
  • rc_switch_user
    • Allows the identity associated with an RcComm to be changed in real-time

 

With these facilities, the iRODS HTTP API can reuse existing iRODS connections to significantly boost performance.

Parallel Writes

iRODS does not allow a data object to be written to in parallel without coordination.

 

Clients wanting to upload data in parallel are required to do the following ...

  1. Open a stream to the replica of interest.
  2. Capture the Replica Access Token from the stream.
  3. Open secondary streams.
    • Each stream must use its own connection
    • Each stream must target the same replica
    • Each stream must use the same open flags
    • Each stream must pass the Replica Access Token obtained from the stream in step (1)
  4. Send bytes across streams.
  5. Close secondary streams without updating the catalog.
  6. Close the original stream normally.

Parallel Writes

Fully supported through the use of a Parallel Write Handle.

 

This ultimately means, the iRODS HTTP API server maintains state on behalf of the client.

 

Performing a Parallel Write requires the use of two operations ...

  • parallel_write_init
    • Instructs the server to allocate memory for managing the state of the upload
  • parallel_write_shutdown
    • Instructs the server to deallocate memory obtained via a call to parallel_write_init

 

Large files must use multipart/form-data as the content type. Failing to honor this rule will result in an error or corrupt data.

Parallel Writes - Example

http_api_url="http://localhost:9000/irods-http-api/0.1.0/data-objects"

# Open 3 streams to the data object, file.bin.
transfer_handle=$(curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $bearer_token" "$http_api_url" \
  --data-urlencode 'op=parallel_write_init'                                     \
  --data-urlencode "lpath=/tempZone/home/rods/file.bin"                         \
  --data-urlencode 'stream-count=3'                                             \
  | jq -r .parallel_write_handle)

# Write "hello" (i.e. 5 bytes) to the data object.
# Notice we didn't specify which stream to use.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $bearer_token" "$http_api_url" \
  -F 'op=write'                                               \
  -F "parallel-write-handle=$transfer_handle"                 \
  -F 'count=5'                                                \
  -F 'bytes=hello;type=application/octet-stream'              \
  | jq

# Shutdown all streams and update the catalog.
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $bearer_token" "$http_api_url" \
  --data-urlencode 'op=parallel_write_shutdown'               \
  --data-urlencode "parallel-write-handle=$transfer_handle"   \
  | jq

Demonstrates how to open 3 streams to a data object and write 5 bytes to it.

Parallel Writes - Java application vs iput

  • Testing was carried out using two machines in different locations
    • Home network vs Office network
  • Custom Java application built on top of the iRODS HTTP API
    • Not optimized
  • Each application used 4 threads to upload a 100 MiB file into iRODS
Client Time Elapsed
iput (uses high ports) 50.113s
Java application 51.975s

Performance is sensitive to buffer sizes and number of threads used.

General Performance - Test Environment and Setup

  • Used ApacheBench to measure Requests Per Second (RPS)
    • Sent 2000 requests total
    • Maintained 500 concurrent requests at all times
  • All testing was performed using a single machine
    • Development machine has 32 cores with 256 GiB of RAM
    • iRODS HTTP API
      • Optimizations enabled
      • 8 threads for foreground processing
      • 56 threads for background processing
      • Connection pool containing 56 iRODS connections

General Performance - Test Results

  • /authenticate - Authenticating a new user using Basic/Native authentication
    • 1389.47 RPS
    • 50% of requests took at least 333 ms to serve
  • /resources - Stat'ing a resource
    • 2702.21 RPS
    • 50% of requests took at least 165 ms to serve
  • /data-objects - Reading 8192 bytes
    • 802.53 RPS
    • 50% of requests took at least 585 ms to serve

Examples - Stat'ing a collection

base_url="http://localhost:9000/irods-http-api/0.1.0"
bearer_token=$(curl -sX POST --user 'rods:rods' "$base_url/authenticate")

curl -sG -H "Authorization: Bearer $bearer_token" \
  "$base_url/collections"                         \
  --data-urlencode 'op=stat'                      \
  --data-urlencode 'lpath=/tempZone/home/rods'    \
  | jq
{
  "inheritance_enabled": false,
  "irods_response": {
    "status_code": 0
  },
  "modified_at": 1686499669,
  "permissions": [
    {
      "name": "rods",
      "perm": "own",
      "type": "rodsadmin",
      "zone": "tempZone"
    }
  ],
  "registered": true,
  "type": "collection"
}

Examples - Listing available Rule Engine Plugins

base_url="http://localhost:9000/irods-http-api/0.1.0"
bearer_token=$(curl -sX POST --user 'rods:rods' "$base_url/authenticate")

curl -sG -H "Authorization: Bearer $bearer_token" \
  "$base_url/rules"                               \
  --data-urlencode 'op=list_rule_engines'         \
  | jq
{
  "irods_response": {
    "status_code": 0
  },
  "rule_engine_plugin_instances": [
    "irods_rule_engine_plugin-irods_rule_language-instance",
    "irods_rule_engine_plugin-cpp_default_policy-instance"
  ]
}

Future Work

  • Document the API in terms of OpenAPI
  • Add support for remaining API endpoints provided by iRODS
    • Bulk/Batch operations
    • Archive file operations
  • Validate the configuration on server startup
  • Harden the implementation
  • Improve performance

v0.1.0 is available today!

 

https://irods.org/2023/11/initial-release-of-the-irods-http-api

 

Help us make this project better for everyone.

Thank you!

Questions?

SC23 - iRODS HTTP API: Presenting iRODS as HTTP

By iRODS Consortium

SC23 - iRODS HTTP API: Presenting iRODS as HTTP

  • 168