Recognising all research outputs and everyone involved in their creation

Simon Hettrick

6 May 2025 - Research Enablers Meeting, Bath     ORCID: 0000-0002-6809-5195

If we don't recognise everyone that is vital to research,

we limit our ability to conduct research.

www.software.ac.uk

Use software

Fundamental to results

69%

92%

n=417

Who's writing all the software?

Ascension, John Singleton Copley, Public Domain

Researcher

Software

Engineer

Research

Software

Engineer

>10,000 RSEs worldwide

Image courtesy Dan Katz

Why did it take until the 2010s to recognise that software is so fundamentally important to research?

WHY ARE WE HERE?

Discovery, reliability, reproducibility, transparency.

Publications are the Bhurj Khalifa

Height = 830 m

Exhibitions are a typical UK bungalow

Height = 3.5 m

Software is a lego person wearing a top hat

Height = 5 cm

What are the dangers of using...

Publications

...as the only metric of research success?

People who are

vital to research

People who are named in publications

Academics

RSEs, Technicians,

Librarians, Data

Stewards, PRISMS,

RMAs... and more

?

The Venn of academic importance and recognition

Imagine a world

where...

Show me the incentive and I will show you the outcome

- Charlie Munger

Recognising all research outputs and every role that makes research possible

 

www.hidden-ref.org

  • Training materials and courses
  • Grimpact
  • Citizen science
  • Enabling access to facilities
  • Community building
  • Standards

New categories

The Hidden Role

CC-BY William Murphy 

Data stewards and managers, Librarians, Technicians, Lived Experience Contributors (including patients), Research Software Engineers, PRISMS (Professional Research Investment and Strategy Managers), Professional Services Personnel, Public Engagement Professionals (PEPs), RMAs (Research Managers and Administrators) and Clinical Trials Managers.

What changed?

Text

Thinktank, Birmingham

7-8 October 2025

2025-2030

What are the barriers to change?

  1. Lack of awareness
  2. Lack of guidance
  3. Inherent difficulty of comparison
  4. Fear of affecting funding

 

It's not easy to shift from campaigning as an outsider to being part of the establishment

What are our plans?

  1. Awareness raising

The

5%

Manifesto

What are our plans?

  1. Awareness raising
  2. Expert groups for the creation of guidance

What are our plans?

  1. Awareness raising
  2. Expert groups for the creation of guidance
  3. NTO workshops to increase experience of NTO assessment

What are our plans?

  1. Awareness raising
  2. Expert groups for the creation of guidance
  3. NTO workshops to increase experience of NTO assessment
  4. Working with the REF to develop guidance on the importance of NTOs to the REF assessment


We need help!

If we recognise everyone that is vital to research,

we advance our ability to conduct research.

Thank you!

@sjh5000

ORCID: 0000-0002-6809-5195, EPSRC Grant no: EP/S021779/1

Licence

 © Simon Hettrick. These slides are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International : https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Link to slides

https://slides.com/simonhettrick/re-bath-2025

Image credits

  • Earth rise: public domain with thanks to NASA
  • Bhurj Khalifa: CC-BY-SA courtesy Donaldytong
  • Bungalow: CC-BY-SA courtesy Peter Wyatt
  • Lego man: CC-BY courtesy Brickset

Research Enablers talk at Bath

By Simon Hettrick

Research Enablers talk at Bath

Presentation for Research Enablers Network at the Uni of Bath

  • 139