Acacia Ackles
PhD student in Integrative Biology at MSU
A new metric for measuring epistatic interactions in the absence of quantifiable fitness interactions
To follow along with the presentation on your own computer, go to bit.do/alife2020-ackles
Michigan State University
Clifford Bohm
Wolfgang Banzhaf
Christoph Adami
Land acknowledgement? What's that?
bit.do/why-land
Michigan State University, where this work was conducted, resides on the ancestral, traditional, and contemporary Lands of the Anishinaabeg - Three Fires Confederacy of Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi peoples.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
We have some naive idea that genetic effects should "stack on top of each other" in some simple way.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
Epistasis is the deviation from that baseline expectation.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
A
B
AB
A
B
AB
A
AB
B
Positive epistasis creates a more beneficial effect than expected.
Negative epistasis creates a more deleterious effect than expected.
No epistasis is our expectation of the fitness effect of two mutations in combination.
Multiple genes must lose normal function before cells become cancerous
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
buffer
instability
reduced generality
unstable specificity
stable specificity
https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Cancer
Epistatic interactions form the basis of complex genetic structures.
If we want to understand complex structures, we need to first understand which sites are interacting epistatically.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
number of mutations
average fitness of genotypes with k mutations
effect of mutations alone
effect of mutations combined
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
What is our baseline expectation?
What number do we assign to fitness?
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
A
B
AB
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
We developed a rank-based measure of epistasis inspired by non-parametric statistics.
1. Rank all single-mutation variants in a population in order of decreasing fitness.
1 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.5
0.2
0.3
0.3
1
2
3
4.5
4.5
6
2. Select a target site, and mutate that site in combination with all single-mutation variants from (1). Rank this list.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.2
1.0
1 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.2
0.9
1
2
3
4.5
4.5
6
2. Select a target site, and mutate that site in combination with all single-mutation variants from (1). Rank this list.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.2
1.0
1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
1.8
1.3
1.0
1.0
0.2
1.0
4
6
2
1
4
4
3. Compare the two ranked lists to determine the degree of epistatic activity at the target site.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
1 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 0 0 0 1 0
0 0 1 1 1 0
0 0 1 0 0 0
0 0 1 0 1 1
1 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 1 0 0 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
1
2
3
4.5
4.5
6
4
6
2
1
4
4
3. Compare the two ranked lists to determine the degree of epistatic activity at the target site.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 0 1 0 1 0
1
2
3
4.5
4.5
6
Wilcoxon's W
4
6
2
1
4
4
0 1 1 0 1 0
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
0 0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 4.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 |
0 1 | 4.2 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 0.1 |
1 0 | 2.0 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 9.3 |
1 1 | 1.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 2.1 | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Increasing k leads to increasing interaction between sites (increased epistasis)
N
K
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 . . . .
N
K
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
2
200
4
9
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
We are testing our rank-based epistasis metric on NK fitness landscapes to see whether it has viability as measure of epistasis without assumptions of interactivity.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
Sites with higher degrees of epistatic activity (higher K) will score higher on this metric.
We will see this result regardless of any a priori assumptions about which genes are interacting with each other or how they interact.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
K (number of sites each site interacts with)
W (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum)
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
W (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum)
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
K (number of sites each site interacts with)
W (Wilcoxon Signed Rank Sum)
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
Locus
K=2
K=4
K=9
Expectation 1: Sites with higher degrees of epistatic activity (higher K) will score higher on this metric.
True! Higher K led to higher rank epistasis.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
True! We saw higher rank epistasis on average even though we did not specify which sites were interacting.
Expectation 2: We will see this result regardless of any a priori assumptions about which genes are interacting with each other or how they interact.
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
http://cse.msu.edu/~dolsonem/
Locus
W
Fine-tuning the metric
Comparison to other metrics
More complex digital landscapes
Application to wet lab work
bit.do/alife2020-ackles
K=2
K=4
K=9
By Acacia Ackles
Presentation for ALife 2020