Perception & production of [voice] contrasts

in Dutch word-initial plosives

Alexandra M. Pfiffner | LSA 2021

roadmap

background on acoustic cues & Dutch [voice] contrasts

research questions

experiment methodology

results

what next?

acoustic cues

phonological contrast is signaled by multiple phonetic cues (Lisker, 1986)

[voice]

glottal pulsing

VOT

f0

transition

F1

transition

acoustic cues

phonological contrast is signaled by multiple phonetic cues (Lisker, 1986)

[voice]

glottal pulsing

VOT

f0

transition

F1

transition

cue weights

glottal pulsing

f0

transition

f0

transition

glottal pulsing

Dutch [voice]

[+voice] in Dutch is traditionally realized with prevoicing

/t/elg 'descendant'

/d/elg

'paying off debt'

/p/erk

'limit'

/b/erk

'birch tree'

van Alphen & Smits (2004)

25% devoicing rate

Pinget (2015)

22-30% devoicing rate

*differed by regional dialect

following vowel f0

/p, t, k/

/b, d/

6 hz

16 hz

Slis & Cohen (1969)

van Alphen & Smits (2004)

Dutch

Afrikaans

Afrikaans

Coetzee et al. (2018)

  • younger women (20s): 83% devoicing rate

  • older women (40s-60s): 44% devoicing rate

  • robust difference in following vowel's f0

  • listened to a young woman's voice in 2AFC

  • artificially manipulated continua varying in VOT and f0

  • all participants relied on both VOT and f0 as cues to underlying voicing

  • when in conflict, VOT > f0

Afrikaans

Pfiffner (in progress)

  • men and women, ages 20s and 60s-80s

  • devoicing rates: women > men of all ages

  • robust difference in following vowel's f0, but larger difference in older participants

  • listened to four different voices in 2AFC

  • artificially manipulated continua varying in VOT and f0

  • when prevoicing is present, it's the dominant cue

  • in the absence of prevoicing, f0 is a cue for all listener/speaker combos but less for the perception of male speakers

6 hz

16 hz

25% devoicing

Slis & Cohen (1969)

van Alphen & Smits (2004)

Pinget (2015)

 

22-30% devoicing

(2020)

?

research questions

What is the current state of [voice] contrasts word-initially in Dutch?

  • devoicing rate

  • differences in following vowel's f0

  • differences by age and gender

  • which cues signal a [voice] contrast

  • relative cue weighting

  • differences by age and gender - both speaker and listener

experiment

25 native speakers of Dutch

Speech Lab, University of Amsterdam

ages 22-29; 61-71

experiment

pad

telg

Randomized wordlist

20 minimal pairs

  • ​10 /p,b/

  • 10 /t,d/

+ fillers

experiment

pad         bad

tal          dal

2AFC

artificially maniuplated continua

  • /pad/-/bad/ 'road', 'bath'

  • /tal/-/dal/ 'quantity', 'valley'

experiment

experiment

prevoicing

f0

none

100%

changing

changing

changing

changing

stable; ambiguous

changing

4 different continua

experiment

female

male

younger

older

4 speaker voices

separated by block

results

younger females: 25%

younger males: 17%

older females: 0%

older males: 9%

mean devoicing rates

individual means

results

following vowel's f0

normalized

Brunelle et al. (2020)

z-scores --> converted for readability with group means & SDs

 

p < 2e-16 ***

results

following vowel's f0

non- normalized

35 Hz

24 Hz

59 Hz

23 Hz

results

younger females

younger males

older females

older males

devoicing

25%

17%

0%

9%

Hz difference

35

24

59

23

results

continua types

no prevoicing - f0 changing

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

prevoicing changing - f0 changing

results

continua type

no prevoicing - f0 changing

 

 

 

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

*collapsed across all listeners and speakers

results

continua type

no prevoicing - f0 changing

 

 

 

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

*sorted by speaker voice

results

continua type

 

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

 

 

 

*sorted by speaker voice

 

no prevoicing - f0 changing

 

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

continua type

 

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

 

 

 

 

listener groups hearing a 60-year-old woman

 

no prevoicing - f0 changing

 

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

results

continua type

 

 

prevoicing changing - f0 constant

 

 

 

 

*sorted by speaker voice

 

no prevoicing - f0 changing

100% prevoicing - f0 changing

 

 

 

results

both prevoicing and f0 can cue phonological voicing

f0 effect: alveolar > bilabial

in the absence of prevoicing:

  • f0 cues voicing more when listening to a younger male speaker and older female speaker

when prevoicing is present:

  • prevoicing is the dominant cue

  • high f0 can outweigh full prevoicing when listening to an older female speaker

research questions

devoicing rate: 0-25% (lot of individual variation!)

differences in following vowel's f0: significant differences, 23-59 Hz

 

differences by age and gender: Yes!

 

  1. younger speakers devoice more

  2. female speakers have larger f0 differences

research questions

which cues signal a [voice] contrast: both prevoicing and f0; though there are place of articulation effects

 

relative cue weighting: prevoicing > f0

 

differences by age and gender:

 

speaker: f0 is stronger with older female voice

listener: no large effects

implications

Dutch may be in the beginning stages of tonogenesis, but too early to be certain

right now: we can see cue re-weighting happening

devoicing in progress

f0 differences widening

f0 can cue contrast with or without prevoicing

what next?

  • examine task effects: word list versus reading passages

  • look closer at results on an individual basis

  • connect perception & production in individuals

  • make larger connections with Afrikaans

This research is supported by NSF Doctoral Dissertation Research award 1918306 as well as two grants from Georgetown University.

Many thanks to Dirk Vet and Paul Boersma for welcoming me into the Speech Lab at the University of Amsterdam.

 

Thank you to Michelle Bak for help with stimuli, and to Andrea Alićehajić and Rorick Terlou for help with data collection.

 

Thanks to A'idah Defilippo and Emilio Luna for help segmenting obstruents.

 

Finally, thank you to the four anonymous speakers and all the participants!

thank you!

references

Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1, retrieved 13 July 2019 from http://www.praat.org


Brunelle, M., Tạ Thành Tấn, Kirby, J. & Đinh Lư Giang. (2020). Transphonologization of voicing in Chru: Studies in production and perception. Laboratory Phonology, 11(1), 15. doi: http://doi.org/10.5334/labphon.278


Coetzee, A. W., Beddor, P. S., Shedden, K., Styler, W. & Wissing, D. (2018). Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis. Journal of Phonetics, 66, 185-216.


Lisker, L. (1986). "Voicing" in English: a catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech, 29(1), 3-11.


Peirce, J. W., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M. R., Höchenberger, R., Sogo,H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). Psychopy2: Experiments in behaviormade easy.Behavior Research Methods, 51:195–203.

Pfiffner, A. M. (2020, July). Tonogenesis in Afrikaans: Age and gender differences in cue weighting. Poster presented at the 17th Conference on Laboratory Phonology, held virtually.

Pinget, A.-F. (2015). The actuation of sound change. PhD thesis, Utrecht University.

Slis, I. H. & Cohen, A. (1969). On complex regulating voiced-voiceless distinction. I. Language and Speech, 12, 80-102.


van Alphen, P. M. (2004). Perceptual relevance of prevoicing in Dutch. PhD thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, Nijmegen.


van Alphen, P. M. & Smits, R. (2004). Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 455-491.

image references

Headphones [Clipart]. (2020). Retrieved from FlyClipart: https://flyclipart.com/dj-garniture-head-phones-headphone-headphones-headset-listen-dj-headphones-png-706986

Libra [Clipart]. Retrieved from iStock: https://www.istockphoto.com/vector/libra-isolated-on-white-background-gm951722782-259803968

Microphone [Clipart]. (2020). Retrieved from FlyClipart: https://flyclipart.com/microphone-transparent-microphone-clipart-transparent-background-microphone-clipart-transparent-45514

Netherlands [Map]. (2020). Retrieved from Free Vector Maps: https://freevectormaps.com/netherlands/NL-EPS-02-0001?ref=atr

The Netherlands Traveler View [Map]. (2020). Retrieved from the CDC website: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/destinations/traveler/none/netherlands

Pins Netherlands-South Africa [Photograph]. (2020). Retrieved from the Crossed Flag Pins website: https://www.crossed-flag-pins.com/shop/Flags-N/Friendship-Pins-Netherlands-XXX/Pins-Netherlands-South-Africa.html

University Van Amsterdam - P.C. Hoofthuis [Photograph]. (2010). Retrieved from Yelp: https://www.yelp.com/biz/university-van-amsterdam-p-c-hoofthuis-amsterdam

World Map [Map]. (2020). Created with the MapLoco! website: https://map1.maploco.com/visited-countries/

LSA 2021 Presentation

By Alexandra Pfiffner

LSA 2021 Presentation

Abstract: This study examines relative cue weights to [voice] contrasts in Dutch word-initial plosives. Perception and production data were collected from 25 native speakers, divided into two gender-balanced age groups (22-29; 61-71). Perception stimuli were artificially-manipulated continua /pad/-/bad/ (‘road’, ‘bath’) and /tal/-/dal/ (‘quantity’, ‘valley’), varying in amount of prevoicing and f0 of the following vowel. Results show that both prevoicing and f0 are used as cues to phonological voicing. Preliminary production results show an increasing rate of devoicing in younger participants, and large f0 differences in female speakers. This suggests that cue weights are in the process of changing.

  • 339