Digital Nomadism in Thailand and Indonesia: What are the Impacts and Benefits?

Background

  • A new form of “lifestyle migration”

 

  • Existing research:
    • telecommuting (Baruch 2001)
    • expatriate communities (Fechter 2012)
    • coworking (Gandini 2015)
    • backpacking (Paris 2012)
    • digital nomads in Ubud (Altringer 2015)

 

  • Digital nomads: A new, under researched, class of lifestyle migrant

 

 

Background

  • Positively contributing to the growth of knowledge society in the developing world?

 

  • Or perpetuating existing inequalities?

 

  • More research needed to gain a clearer view of impacts and benefits on local communities in the developing world

 

Research Question & Aims

 

"What are the impacts and benefits of digital nomadism for local communities in Thailand and Indonesia?”

 

 

Methodology

 

  • Constructivist/Post-positivist: Interrogating people's “perceptions of the world rather than the 'world as it is'” (Moses & Knutsen p10)
     
  • Cross-cultural investigation

 

  • Benefits and Impacts: What constitutes a benefit versus what constitutes an negative impact is culturally specific and value laden
     

 

 

Method

 

 

  • Ethnographic observation followed by semi-structured individual interviews (Wengraf 2001)

 

  • Ethnographic phase: Build familiarity, trust. "Self-disclosure" (Holstein & Gubrium 2003, p.14)

 

  • Ethnographic phase: "how the lived experiences of the particular subject category ...can inform participants' conversation in the interview situation” (Holstein & Gubrium 2003, p.6)

 

 

Method

  • Semi-structured interviews: Well suited epistemologically to acquiring socially constructed knowledge. Exploring knowledge “based on the meanings that life experiences hold for the interviewees” (DiCicco-Bloom & Crabtree 2006, p.314)

 

  • Semi-structured interviews: Interview schedule adapted based on the learnings of the ethnographic phase

 

  • Semi-structured interviews: Focus on local peoples' perceptions and experiences of digital nomads. Phenomenological line of questioning

Method

  • Semi-structured interviews: Conducted face-to-face in the interviewees native language, with a translator

 

  • Semi-structured interviews: Translation will provide a significant challenge to adopting a reflective interviewing style

 

  • Semi-structured interviews: Temple & Young offer several useful tips for dealing with translation challenges (Temple & Young 2004)

Participants

 

  • Focus on two cities, Chang Mai and Ubud. Among the top digital nomad destinations

 

  • Anyone who lives in the local community that has interacted with or been exposed to digital nomads

 

  • Not targeting a specific community segment, demographic or niche

 

 

Participants

  • The recruitment stragegy will be the “site based” approach (Arcury & Quandt 1999)

 

  • Establish relationships with "gatekeepers" in coworking spaces and cafes

 

  • Option for "snowball" sampling 

    (Atkinson & Flint 2001) if appropriate participants prove scarce; goal of 30 interviews per city (Baker & Edwards 2012)

 

  • Plan C: Reverse approach - establish relationships with digital nomads to get to local community members

 

 

Analysis

  • Inductive process; not testing a pre-determined hypothesis; identify emergent patterns, categories, themes (Schutt 2014)

 

  • Narrative analysis: “seeks to put together the 'big picture' about experiences or events as the participants understand them” (Schutt 2014, p.338)

 

  • Transcripts coded with a view to identifying narrative archetypes which reveal benefits and impacts of digital nomadism
     

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ethics

  • "Flexible and contextual...ethics [in qualitative research] involves trustfulness, openness, honesty, respectfulness, carefulness, and constant attentiveness" (Davies & Dodd 2002, p.288)

 

  • Potential for ramifications amongst community groups/members - participants will be anonymised

 

  • Consent forms; raw data encrypted

 

  • Maintain contact with participants

 

  • Acknowledge translation; attribute translators

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timeline

  • Proposed duration: 1 year

 

  • Main phases:
    • 3 months in the field in Chang Mai, Thailand
    • 3 months in the field in Ubud, Indonesia
    • 6 months to conduct transcription, analysis and write up report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thankyou.

deck

By eedeep

deck

  • 589