Digital Nomadism in Thailand and Indonesia: What are the Impacts and Benefits?
Background
- A new form of “lifestyle migration”
- Existing research:
- telecommuting (Baruch 2001)
- expatriate communities (Fechter 2012)
- coworking (Gandini 2015)
- backpacking (Paris 2012)
- digital nomads in Ubud (Altringer 2015)
- Digital nomads: A new, under researched, class of lifestyle migrant
Background
- Positively contributing to the growth of knowledge society in the developing world?
- Or perpetuating existing inequalities?
- More research needed to gain a clearer view of impacts and benefits on local communities in the developing world
Research Question & Aims
"What are the impacts and benefits of digital nomadism for local communities in Thailand and Indonesia?”
Methodology
- Constructivist/Post-positivist: Interrogating people's “perceptions of the world rather than the 'world as it is'” (Moses & Knutsen p10)
- Cross-cultural investigation
- Benefits and Impacts: What constitutes a benefit versus what constitutes an negative impact is culturally specific and value laden
Method
-
Ethnographic observation followed by semi-structured individual interviews (Wengraf 2001)
- Ethnographic phase: Build familiarity, trust. "Self-disclosure" (Holstein & Gubrium 2003, p.14)
-
Ethnographic phase: "how the lived experiences of the particular subject category ...can inform participants' conversation in the interview situation” (Holstein & Gubrium 2003, p.6)
Method
- Semi-structured interviews: Well suited epistemologically to acquiring socially constructed knowledge. Exploring knowledge “based on the meanings that life experiences hold for the interviewees” (DiCicco-Bloom & Crabtree 2006, p.314)
- Semi-structured interviews: Interview schedule adapted based on the learnings of the ethnographic phase
- Semi-structured interviews: Focus on local peoples' perceptions and experiences of digital nomads. Phenomenological line of questioning
Method
- Semi-structured interviews: Conducted face-to-face in the interviewees native language, with a translator
- Semi-structured interviews: Translation will provide a significant challenge to adopting a reflective interviewing style
- Semi-structured interviews: Temple & Young offer several useful tips for dealing with translation challenges (Temple & Young 2004)
Participants
- Focus on two cities, Chang Mai and Ubud. Among the top digital nomad destinations
- Anyone who lives in the local community that has interacted with or been exposed to digital nomads
- Not targeting a specific community segment, demographic or niche
Participants
- The recruitment stragegy will be the “site based” approach (Arcury & Quandt 1999)
- Establish relationships with "gatekeepers" in coworking spaces and cafes
- Option for "snowball" sampling
(Atkinson & Flint 2001) if appropriate participants prove scarce; goal of 30 interviews per city (Baker & Edwards 2012)
- Plan C: Reverse approach - establish relationships with digital nomads to get to local community members
Analysis
- Inductive process; not testing a pre-determined hypothesis; identify emergent patterns, categories, themes (Schutt 2014)
- Narrative analysis: “seeks to put together the 'big picture' about experiences or events as the participants understand them” (Schutt 2014, p.338)
- Transcripts coded with a view to identifying narrative archetypes which reveal benefits and impacts of digital nomadism
Ethics
- "Flexible and contextual...ethics [in qualitative research] involves trustfulness, openness, honesty, respectfulness, carefulness, and constant attentiveness" (Davies & Dodd 2002, p.288)
- Potential for ramifications amongst community groups/members - participants will be anonymised
- Consent forms; raw data encrypted
- Maintain contact with participants
- Acknowledge translation; attribute translators
Timeline
- Proposed duration: 1 year
- Main phases:
- 3 months in the field in Chang Mai, Thailand
- 3 months in the field in Ubud, Indonesia
-
6 months to conduct transcription, analysis and write up report
Thankyou.

deck
By eedeep
deck
- 589