"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is not the convinced nazi or the convinced communist, but people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist."

Hannah Arendt

The Origins Of Totalitarianism

 

It's Huxley, not Orwell

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.

I am a criminal

References

Real Impact

Rabbit Hole Effect: algorithms designed to keep the user engaged as long as possible

References

Disinformation and the far-right

References

January 6, 2021 United States Capitol Attack

"Voter Fraud" on Twitter

The 200 accounts shown above are a sample of a network on Twitter talking about Voter Fraud and amplifying false and/or misleading narratives about election integrity and the democratic process. We discovered that this group of 200 accounts either generated or were mentioned in over 140 million tweets over the last year. As you will see below, this network is not only growing at an accelerating rate but also coordinating with effective tactics that appear to bypass many of the detection methods of existing disinformation research.

January 8, 2023 Brasília Attacks

References

Why staying on X is complete non-sense

  • Myth of Necessary Opposition
    • Direct counter-speech on social media platforms does not effectively combat disinformation
    • Algorithms favor polarizing content, amplifying disinformation despite opposition
    • Staying paradoxically contribute to the further dissemination of disinformation

 

References

Why staying on X is complete non-sense

  • Algorithmic Influence
    • Profit-oriented: prioritize engagement over fair discourse
    • Extreme content: polarization, anger, and controversy
    • Disagreements:  you increase the reach

Why staying on X is complete non-sense

  • Leaving is Not a Defeat
    • Refusal to support a manipulative system
    • Reduces the platform business model with attention data
    • Strengthening the Fediverse or other decentralized alternatives

Why staying on X is complete non-sense

  • Conclusion
    • Abandoning mainstream social media for decentralized alternatives foster genuine discourse and dialogue
    • Withdrawing attention is crucial to weakening the manipulative system.
    • Politicians and media should lead by example

"For the sovereignty of Brazil, for the independence of the Judiciary and for the citizenship of all Brazilians. For we ceased to be a colony on September 7, 1822 and, with courage, we are building an independent and ever better Republic, independent and democratic. And we are building it with courage. As the eminent minister Cármen Lúcia always reminds us, quoting Guimarães Rosa: 'What life wants from us is courage'"

 

Alexandre de Moraes

The US wants to ban Brazilian judge that blocked X

"I’m in Munich and people keep asking me to decode Vance’s speech. OK: In Vance English, “free speech” means “Let Musk run your elections” and “democracy” means “let Russia run your elections.” Now move on. 2025 is about what Europeans do, not what Americans say."

 

Timothy Snyder

Give us

the raw data

NOW!

In 2010...

Ditch the autocrats' propaganda.

NOW!

Leave X.

deck

By Everton Zanella Alvarenga