Bachelor Colloquium 

Hannah Ruppelt

23.10.2015

Supervisors:

Dr. Martin Rosema

Prof. dr. Kees Aarts

Overview

• EU-Spitzenkandidaten

• Democratic deficit

• Research question

• Hypotheses

• Methodology and analysis

• Findings

• Implications for the 2019 European elections

Topic:

 

Citizens' knowledge about the EU-Spitzenkandidaten for the 2014 European elections

The EU's democratic deficit 

European Parliament

EU citizens

European Commission

European Council

Solution for the democratic deficit?Spitzenkandidaten procedure!

EU citizens

European Commission President 

European elections

European Parliament

Citizens:

not interested and not aware

 

Media:

sceptical

Channels for political knowledge

Formal education

Political discussions

News consumption

Internet presence of candidates in social media

To what extent did the usage of established and new media sources influence a voter’s political knowledge about the 2014 EU-Spitzenkandidaten?

Research question

• News consumption via TV 

• News consumption via newspapers

• News consumption via Internet

• Internet usage

Hypotheses

Data set

Coding

 

Methodology and analysis I

Can you identify the European party group or the national party of Juncker, Schulz and Verhofstadt?

Citizens' knowledge about the candidates

Cross-Tables

Spearman's Rho correlation

 

Methodology and analysis II

Findings

The impact of age

Relationship between internet use and knowledge about the candidates

Age

What does my research show?

• All relationships between media variables and knowledge about the candidates are significant and positive

• Established media and new media both influenced citizens' knowledge

• Reading newspapers showed strongest correlation

• Internet less influential as assumed 

Implications for 2019 European elections

• Spitzenkandidaten procedure has been established

• Media will be less sceptical 

• Spitzenkandidaten procedure can reduce democratic deficit (requires informed citizens)

• More & better news coverage by all channels needed

Thank you for your attention!

Do you have questions?

References

AMR GmbH Dusseldorf. (2014). Post EU election polling project [Report]. Retrieved February 26, 2015, from http://www.aecr.eu/media/AECRAMR-European-election-poll.pdf.

Bakker, T. P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Good news for the future? Young people, Internet use, and political participation. Communication Research. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://crx.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/01/07/0093650210381738.full.pdf+html

Barbière, C. (2014). Umfrage zur Europawahl: Rennen um die Spitzenkandidaten hat nur 5 Prozent der Wähler interessiert [Electronic article]. Retrieved May 5, 2015, from http://www.euractiv.de/sections/europawahlen-2014/umfrage-zur-europawahl-rennen-um-die-spitzenkandidaten-hat-nur-5-prozent.

Broadcasters EUROVISION Presidential Debate. (n.d.). [Table]. Retrieved June 14, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/divers/broadcasters.pdf.

Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1997). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media age. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp.160-181). Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Dinter, J., & Weissenbach, K. (2015). Alles Neu! Das Experiment TV-Debatte im Europawahlkampf 2014. In M. Kaeding  & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 233-245). Duisburg: Springer.

European Commision. (2013a). Commission Recommendations of 12 March 2013 on enhancing the democratic and efficient conduct of the elections to the European Parliament (Recommendations 2013/142/EU). Retrieved September 26, 2015, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013H0142&from=DE.

European Commision. (2013b). Standard Eurobarometer 80 Autumn 2013. Public Opinion in the European Union [Report]. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb80/eb80_first_en.pdf.

European Parliament. (2012). European Parliament resolution of 22 November 2012 on the elections to the European Parliament in 2014 (Resolution 2012/2829(RSP)). Retrieved September 26, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=TA&language=EN&reference=P7-TA-2012-462.

European Parliament. (2014). Election results: 2014 [Table]. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/elections2014-results/en/election-results-2014.html.

European Parliament News. (2014). The 2014 European elections: This time it's different [Press release]. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20140210BKG35568/html/THE-2014-EUROPEAN-ELECTIONS-THIS-TIME-IT%E2%80%99S-DIFFERENT.  

Eurostat. (2014). tsdgo310 - Voter turnout in national and EU parliamentary elections from 1990, by year and reference area [Table]. Retrieved May 4, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tsdgo310.

Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533-562.

Fox, B. (2014). Juncker declares victory in race for Commission presidency [Electronic Article]. EUobserver. Retrieved September 26, 2015, from https://euobserver.com/news/124337.

Gattermann, K. (2015). Europäische Spitzenkandidaten und deren (Un-) Sichtbarkeit in der nationalen Zeitungsberichterstattung. In M. Kaeding  & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 211-222). Duisburg: Springer.

Heidbreder, E., & Auracher, J. (2015). Die Rolle europäischer Spitzenkandidaten im institutionellen Wettstreit. In M. Kaeding  & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 223-231). Duisburg: Springer.

Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

Hix, S. (2008). What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix it. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.

Hobolt, S. B. (2014). A vote for the President? The role of Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1528-1540.

Kenski, K., & Stroud, N. J. (2006). Connections between Internet use and political efficacy, knowledge, and participation. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media, 50(2), 173-192.

Kyburz, K. (2014). Phoenix: Europawahl erreicht kaum Zuschauer [Electronic article]. Retrieved September 12, 2015, from http://www.quotenmeter.de/n/70768/.

Mahony, H. (2014). The spitzenkandidaten coup [Electronic article]. EUobserver. Retrieved September 26, 2015, from https://euobserver.com/review-2014/126456.

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. Retrieved May 30, 2015, from http://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Manovich-LangNewMedia-excerpt.pdf: MIT press.

Niedermayer, O. (2014). Immer noch eine "nationale Nebenwahl"? Die Wahl zum Europäischen Parlament vom 25. Mai 2014. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen (ZParl), 3/2014, 523-546.

Obholzer, L. (2015). Campaigning on Twitter. In M. Kaeding  & N. Switek (Eds.), Die Europawahl 2014 (pp. 247-256). Duisburg: Springer.

Prior, M. (2005). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577-592.

Quintelier, E., & Vissers, S. (2008). The effect of Internet use on political participation an analysis of survey results for 16-year-olds in Belgium. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 411-427.

Schmitt, H., Hobolt, S. B., & Popa, S. A. (2015). Does personalization increase turnout? Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament elections. European Union Politics. Retrieved October 2, 2015, from http://eup.sagepub.com/content/early/2015/06/03/1465116515584626.abstract.

Vincenti, D. (2015). Analysts: 2019 EU elections will be transformative for European democracy [Electronic article]. EurActiv. Retrieved October 6, 2015, from http://www.euractiv.com/sections/elections/analysts-2019-eu-elections-will-be-transformative-european-democracy-314633.